J Psychoactive Drugs. 2011 Sep;Suppl 7:3-9. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2011.601963.
Although some practices clearly have stronger supporting evidence than others, a single authoritative list of evidence-based practices (EBPs) that can be applied in the treatment of criminal justice clients does not exist. Nationally, use of EBPs is low, and such practices are generally only implemented under certain circumstances. To clarify these issues, experts from around the nation were invited to California for two research-to-policy meetings focused on EBP identification and implementation. Their presentations and the resulting series of articles in this special theme issue describe the current state of EBP research for criminal justice clients. To advance the field beyond the compilation of EBP lists, which can only represent a partial solution at best, next steps should include a greater focus on quality of implementation, intensity of quality assurance and monitoring, and training for underlying skills and principles.
尽管一些实践显然比其他实践有更强的支持证据，但不存在一份可用于刑事司法客户治疗的单一、权威的循证实践清单。在全国范围内，循证实践的使用率很低，而且这些实践通常仅在某些情况下实施。为了澄清这些问题，来自全国各地的专家应邀前往加利福尼亚州参加了两次专注于循证实践识别和实施的研究到政策会议。他们的演讲以及本特刊中的一系列文章描述了针对刑事司法客户的循证实践研究的现状。为了将该领域从循证实践清单的编制（最多只能代表部分解决方案）推进到下一步，下一步应该包括更加关注实施质量、质量保证和监测的强度，以及基础技能和原则的培训。
