Otte D, Sandor L, Zwipp H
Verkehrsunfallforschung der Unfallchirurgischen Klinik, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover.
Unfallchirurg. 1990 Sep;93(9):418-25.
An analysis of 96 persons who sustained injuries to dorsal and lumbar vertebrae during traffic accidents, established that spinal injuries (sustained by 3.8% of the 96 persons) are quite rare. Pedestrians, the elderly, and polytraumatized persons with extensive head injuries as accompanying trauma following particularly serious accidents are at especially high risk. The most frequent spinal injuries are compression fractures, which especially often give rise to the injury pattern found in the spine of motorcycle riders, pedestrians, and car passengers not wearing seat belts. In these cases a so-called "pushing-further" mechanism is quite often assumed as the biomechanical cause. In comparison, ruptures of the transverse process have often been established for car passengers wearing seat belts, which can be attributed causally to a psoas effect resulting from an overstretching movement of the body and muscular strain. Basically three different biomechanical movement patterns were established in this study: sliding mechanism, shearing effect and psoas effect; which of these is are involved depends on the capacity in which the person affected takes part in street traffic. All the spinal fractures examined can be classed as trauma sustained while travelling at high speed. They are not observed following collisions at low or moderate speed.
对96名在交通事故中背部和腰椎受伤的人员进行的分析表明,脊柱损伤(96人中3.8%的人遭受)相当罕见。行人、老年人以及在特别严重事故后伴有广泛头部损伤的多发伤患者尤其高危。最常见的脊柱损伤是压缩性骨折,这尤其常导致在未系安全带的摩托车骑手、行人及汽车乘客脊柱中发现的损伤模式。在这些情况下,常假定一种所谓的“进一步推挤”机制为生物力学原因。相比之下,对于系安全带的汽车乘客,常发现横突骨折,这可因果归因于身体过度伸展运动和肌肉拉伤导致的腰大肌效应。本研究基本上确定了三种不同的生物力学运动模式:滑动机制、剪切效应和腰大肌效应;其中哪种模式涉及取决于受影响人员参与道路交通的身份。所有检查的脊柱骨折都可归类为高速行驶时遭受的创伤。在低速或中速碰撞后未观察到此类骨折。