Bansal Ritu, Puttaiah Raghunath, Harris Robert, Reddy Anil
Masters Program in Public Health, University ofTexas-Houston School of Public Health,, Dallas, TX, USA.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2011 Mar 1;12(2):73-83. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1013.
Dental unit water systems are contaminated with biofilms that amplify bacterial counts in dental treatment water in excess of a million colony forming units per milliliter (cfu/ml). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Dental Association have agreed that the maximum allowable contamination of dental treatment water not exceed 500 cfu/ml. This study was conducted to evaluate two protocols in controlling contamination of dental unit water systems and dental treatment water. Both methods used an antimicrobial self-dissolving chlorine dioxide (ClO₂) tablet at a high concentration (50 ppm) to shock the dental unit water system biofilms initially followed by periodic exposure. To treat dental treatment source water for patient care, 3 parts per million (ppm) ClO₂ in municipal/tap water was compared to use of a citrus botanical extract dissolved in municipal water. Heterotrophic microbial counts of effluent water and laser scanning confocal microscopy were performed to evaluate effects of the two treatments. Results from this study indicated that both treatments were effective in controlling biofilm contamination and reducing heterotrophic plate counts <500 cfu/ml. A comprehensive study addressing compatibility of 50 ppm ClO₂ on the metals and nonmetal components of the dental water system and effects of low-grade chemicals used on composite bonding to dentin and enamel is warranted before translation from efficacy studies to common clinical use.
This study provides evidence-based information of using two methods of controlling dental treatment water contamination. The study was conducted in a clinical practice setting in an active dental clinic and the results are meaningful to a clinician who is interested in providing safe dental treatment water for patient care.
Dental waterline biofilms, Dental treatment water contamination control, Chlorine dioxide, Emulsifiers, Heterotrophic plate counts, Laser scanning confocal microscopy. How to cite this article: Bansal R, Puttaiah R, Harris R, Reddy A. Evaluation of Two Methods in Controlling Dental Treatment Water Contamination. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011;12(2):73-83. Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None declared.
牙科设备水系统被生物膜污染,这些生物膜会使牙科治疗用水中的细菌数量增加,超过每毫升一百万菌落形成单位(cfu/ml)。疾病控制与预防中心以及美国牙科协会一致认为,牙科治疗用水的最大允许污染量不应超过500 cfu/ml。本研究旨在评估两种控制牙科设备水系统和牙科治疗用水污染的方案。两种方法均使用高浓度(50 ppm)的抗菌自溶性二氧化氯(ClO₂)片剂,首先对牙科设备水系统生物膜进行冲击处理,随后定期进行处理。为了处理用于患者护理的牙科治疗源水,将市政/自来水中百万分之三(ppm)的ClO₂与溶解在市政水中的柑橘植物提取物的使用进行了比较。对流出水进行异养微生物计数,并使用激光扫描共聚焦显微镜来评估两种处理方法的效果。本研究结果表明,两种处理方法在控制生物膜污染和将异养平板计数降低至<500 cfu/ml方面均有效。在从功效研究转化为常规临床应用之前,有必要进行一项全面研究,以探讨50 ppm ClO₂对牙科水系统金属和非金属部件的兼容性以及所使用的低等级化学物质对复合树脂与牙本质和牙釉质粘结的影响。
本研究提供了关于使用两种控制牙科治疗用水污染方法的循证信息。该研究是在一家活跃的牙科诊所的临床实践环境中进行的,其结果对于有兴趣为患者护理提供安全牙科治疗用水的临床医生具有重要意义。
牙科水线生物膜;牙科治疗用水污染控制;二氧化氯;乳化剂;异养平板计数;激光扫描共聚焦显微镜。如何引用本文:班萨尔R,普塔亚R,哈里斯R,雷迪A。两种控制牙科治疗用水污染方法的评估。《当代牙科实践杂志》2011年;12(2):73 - 83。支持来源:无。利益冲突:未声明。