Komatsu Takashi, Tachibana Hideaki, Sato Yoshihiro, Ozawa Mahito, Kunugita Fusanori, Nakamura Motoyuki
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine and Memorial Heart Center, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan.
Int Heart J. 2011;52(6):359-65. doi: 10.1536/ihj.52.359.
There is little information available on the benefits of selection of statins as upstream therapy for the prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). We compared the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin (A-group, n = 43) and pravastatin (P-group, n = 41) as upstream therapy in patients with paroxysmal AF and dyslipidemia. A total of 84 patients (45 men, mean age, 66 ± 9 years, mean follow-up, 49 ± 32 months) were retrospectively assigned to receive atorvastatin (n = 41;10 mg/day) or pravastatin (n = 43 ; 10 mg/day). Survival rates free from AF recurrence at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months were 93%, 74%, 60%, and 53% in A-group, and 88%, 49%, 37%, and 29%, respectively, in P-group (P = 0.029, A-group versus P-group). Survival rates free from conversion to permanent AF at 12, 36, 60, and 90 months were 100%, 100%, 98%, and 95% in A-group, and 100%, 95%, 88%, and 83%, respectively, in P-group (P = 0.063, A-group versus P-group). Using a logistic regression model, atorvastatin was found to be associated with a significantly reduced risk of AF recurrence in comparison to pravastatin (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.68, P = 0.005). This association remained significant after adjustment for potentially confounding variables (OR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.08-0.86, P = 0.027). Using a logistic regression model, atorvastatin was not associated with a significantly reduced risk of converting to permanent AF in comparison to pravastatin (unadjusted OR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.05-1.50, P = 0.138), but this association did show a significant difference after adjustment for potentially confounding variables in a multivariate model (OR = 0.08, 95% CI 0.06-0.96, P = 0.046). Adverse effects requiring discontinuation of statins were observed in 1 case (2%, myalgia) in A-group, and 1 case (2%, elevation in CPK level ≥ 500 IU/L) in P-group, respectively (P = NS, A-group versus P-group). Atorvastatin, a lipophilic statin, was considered to be more effective in preventing recurrence of paroxysmal AF and conversion to permanent AF than pravastatin, a hydrophilic statin.
关于选择他汀类药物作为上游治疗以预防阵发性心房颤动(AF)的益处,目前可获得的信息较少。我们比较了阿托伐他汀(A组,n = 43)和普伐他汀(P组,n = 41)作为上游治疗在阵发性AF和血脂异常患者中的疗效和安全性。总共84例患者(45例男性,平均年龄66±9岁,平均随访49±32个月)被回顾性分配接受阿托伐他汀(n = 41;10mg/天)或普伐他汀(n = 43;10mg/天)治疗。A组在1、6、12和24个月时无AF复发的生存率分别为93%、74%、60%和53%,P组分别为88%、49%、37%和29%(P = 0.029,A组与P组比较)。A组在12、36、60和90个月时无转为永久性AF的生存率分别为100%、100%、98%和95%,P组分别为100%、95%、88%和83%(P = 0.063,A组与P组比较)。使用逻辑回归模型,发现与普伐他汀相比,阿托伐他汀与AF复发风险显著降低相关(未调整优势比[OR]=0.27,95%置信区间0.11 - 0.68,P = 0.005)。在对潜在混杂变量进行调整后,这种关联仍然显著(OR = 0.26,95%CI 0.08 - 0.86,P = 0.027)。使用逻辑回归模型,与普伐他汀相比,阿托伐他汀与转为永久性AF风险显著降低无关(未调整OR = 0.29,95%CI 0.05 - 1.50,P = 0.138),但在多变量模型中对潜在混杂变量进行调整后,这种关联确实显示出显著差异(OR = 0.08,95%CI 0.06 - 0.96,P = 0.046)。A组有1例(2%,肌痛)和P组有1例(2%,CPK水平升高≥500IU/L)出现需要停用他汀类药物的不良反应(P = 无显著性差异,A组与P组比较)。亲脂性他汀阿托伐他汀被认为在预防阵发性AF复发和转为永久性AF方面比亲水性他汀普伐他汀更有效。