Orsi Iara Augusta, Andrade Vanessa Gomes, Bonato Pierina Sueli, Raimundo Lariça Barbosa, Herzog Daniella Silva, Borie Eduardo
Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontic, Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2011;22(6):490-6. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402011000600009.
This study evaluated the release of glutaraldehyde from heat-polymerized acrylic resins subjected to disinfection followed by chemical and mechanical polishing. Ninety disc-shaped specimens (15 x 4 mm), 30 per resin (Lucitone 550, QC-20 and Classico), were made and assigned to 2 groups according to the type of polishing. One side of each specimen was not polished and the other was either mechanically (n = 45) or chemically (n = 45) polished, and immersed in water at 50 °C for 1 h to allow the release of intrinsic substances and then kept in distilled water for 7 days. The specimens were disinfected by immersion in 2% glutaraldehyde for 10 min. After this period, 3 specimens from each group were immersed in water for 15, 30, 60, 120 and 240 min. For the 15-, 30-, 60-min immersions, 4 water exchanges were done at the end of period. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to detect and quantify the glutaraldehyde released after each period. Data were analyzed statistically by two-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons were done by Tukey's and Scheffé's tests (α = 0.05). No glutaraldehyde release was observed from the specimens with chemical polishing at any of the immersion periods, while the mechanically polished specimens released glutaraldehyde. In the groups with water exchanges, Lucitone released more disinfectant in the 15-min period (0.040 μg/mL), Classico in the 30-min (0.021 μg/mL) and 60-min (0.018 μg/mL) periods, and QC-20 the same amount (-1.760 μg/mL) in all periods. In the groups without water exchanges, Lucitone released the highest amount of disinfectant (-1.370 μg/mL), differing significantly from QC-20 (0022 g/mL) and Classico (0019 g/mL), which were similar. The findings of this showed that chemically polished specimens from the 3 resin brands did not release glutaraldehyde after different periods of immersion, while glutaraldehyde release was observed from the mechanically polished specimens, especially from those made of Lucitone resin.
本研究评估了经消毒后再进行化学和机械抛光的热聚合丙烯酸树脂中戊二醛的释放情况。制作了90个圆盘状标本(15×4毫米),每种树脂(Lucitone 550、QC - 20和Classico)各30个,并根据抛光类型分为2组。每个标本的一侧不进行抛光,另一侧进行机械抛光(n = 45)或化学抛光(n = 45),然后在50°C的水中浸泡1小时以释放内在物质,之后在蒸馏水中保存7天。将标本浸入2%的戊二醛中消毒10分钟。在此之后,每组的3个标本分别在水中浸泡15、30、60、120和240分钟。对于15分钟、30分钟和60分钟的浸泡,在浸泡期结束时进行4次换水。使用高效液相色谱法(HPLC)检测和定量每个时间段后释放的戊二醛。数据采用双向方差分析进行统计学分析,并通过Tukey检验和Scheffé检验进行多重比较(α = 0.05)。在任何浸泡时间段,化学抛光的标本均未观察到戊二醛释放,而机械抛光的标本释放了戊二醛。在进行换水的组中,Lucitone在15分钟时间段释放的消毒剂更多(0.040μg/mL),Classico在30分钟(0.021μg/mL)和60分钟(0.018μg/mL)时间段释放较多,QC - 20在所有时间段释放量相同(-1.760μg/mL)。在不进行换水的组中,Lucitone释放的消毒剂最多(-1.370μg/mL),与QC - 20(0.022μg/mL)和Classico(0.019μg/mL)有显著差异,后两者相似。本研究结果表明,来自3个树脂品牌的化学抛光标本在不同浸泡时间段后均未释放戊二醛,而机械抛光的标本释放了戊二醛,尤其是由Lucitone树脂制成的标本。