American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106, USA.
Acad Med. 2012 Feb;87(2):157-63. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31823f3a57.
To examine the association between physicians' cognitive skills and their performance on a composite measure of diabetes care that included process, outcome, and patient experience measures.
The sample was 676 physicians from the United States with time-limited certification in general internal medicine between 2005 and 2009. Scores from the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) internal medicine maintenance of certification (MOC) examination were used to measure practicing physicians' cognitive skills (scores reflect fund of medical knowledge, diagnostic acumen, and clinical judgment). Practice performance was assessed using a diabetes composite measure aggregated from clinical and patient experience measures obtained from the ABIM Diabetes Practice Improvement Module.
Using multiple regression analyses and controlling for physician and patient characteristics, MOC examination scores were significantly associated with the diabetes composite scores (β = .22, P < .001). The association was particularly stronger with intermediate outcomes than with process and patient experience measures. Performance in the endocrine disease content domain of the examination was more strongly associated with the diabetes composite scores (β = .19, P < .001) than the performance in other medical content domains (β = .06-.14).
Physicians' cognitive skills significantly relate to their performance on a comprehensive composite measure for diabetes care. Although significant, the modest association suggests that there are unique aspects of physician competence captured by each assessment alone and that both must be considered when assessing a physician's ability to provide high-quality care.
考察医生的认知技能与其在包括过程、结果和患者体验措施在内的糖尿病护理综合衡量标准上的表现之间的关联。
该样本是来自美国的 676 名具有普通内科有限认证的医生,其认证时间在 2005 年至 2009 年之间。美国内科委员会(ABIM)内科维持认证(MOC)考试的分数用于衡量执业医生的认知技能(分数反映医学知识、诊断敏锐度和临床判断的综合水平)。实践表现通过使用 ABIM 糖尿病实践改进模块获得的临床和患者体验措施综合的糖尿病综合衡量标准来评估。
通过多元回归分析并控制医生和患者特征,MOC 考试分数与糖尿病综合分数显著相关(β=.22,P <.001)。与过程和患者体验措施相比,这种关联在中间结果方面更为显著。考试内分泌疾病内容领域的表现与糖尿病综合分数的相关性更强(β=.19,P <.001),而其他医学内容领域的表现相关性较弱(β=.06-.14)。
医生的认知技能与其在糖尿病护理综合衡量标准上的表现显著相关。虽然关联显著,但这种适度的关联表明,医生能力的每个评估都单独捕捉到了医生能力的独特方面,在评估医生提供高质量护理的能力时,两者都必须考虑。