Department of Internal Medicine, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Acad Med. 2012 Feb;87(2):185-91. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31823f40a2.
The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education recommends the structured portfolio as a preferred assessment tool for assessing all six of its core physician competencies. However, compared with other evaluation measures, it may be one of the most resource-intensive for learners and evaluators. Given the time and effort needed to properly develop mentors, train evaluators, and persuade learners, facilitation of the learning environment supporting a portfolio may be the most important variable determining its success or failure. The authors review the components necessary to successfully build and maintain a robust portfolio learning environment in a graduate medical education setting. These include gaining staff acceptance, staging implementation, enhancing learner participation, training mentors, choosing paper versus electronic formats, and selecting assessment methods. Their blueprint for implementing a portfolio is informed by their five-year experience with a portfolio rollout in one internal medicine residency, from 2006 to 2011.
美国研究生医学教育认证委员会建议将结构化的个人学术档案作为评估其全部六项核心医师能力的首选评估工具。然而,与其他评估方法相比,它可能是学习者和评估者最耗费资源的评估方法之一。鉴于需要适当培养导师、培训评估者并说服学习者所需的时间和精力,促进支持个人学术档案的学习环境可能是决定其成败的最重要因素。作者回顾了在研究生医学教育环境中成功构建和维护强大的个人学术档案学习环境所需的组成部分。这些包括获得员工认可、逐步实施、增强学习者的参与度、培训导师、选择纸质或电子格式以及选择评估方法。他们实施个人学术档案的蓝图来自于他们在 2006 年至 2011 年期间在一个内科住院医师培训项目中实施个人学术档案的五年经验。