Leong Jun Rey, Lim Adele Yi Dawn, Ravindran Nila, Wan Darius Wei Jun, Rajalingam Varsha, Lua Jun Kiat, Kwok Hannah Yi Fang, Sheri Krish, Fam Victoria Jia En, Govindasamy Ranitha, Abdul Hamid Nur Amira Binte, Dunn Michael, Krishna Lalit Kumar Radha
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, Block 1E, Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 30 Hospital Boulevard, Singapore, 168583, Singapore.
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 24;25(1):1110. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07353-x.
Effective mentoring in medical education facilitates professional development amongst mentees and mentors, improves patient care and outcomes, as well as advances the reputation of the host organisation. Much of this success is guided, assessed and overseen by the mentor. Yet, mentor training remains inconsistent, poorly supported and often inadequately evaluated. Acknowledging mentor training as an essential aspect of mentoring programs, we propose a review to map current features and approaches to mentor training with the hopes of boosting the effective design of a proposed mentoring program.
PubMed, Scopus, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL database searches were conducted for articles published between 1 January 2000 and 31 March 2024 on mentor training programs in medical education. This systematic scoping review was directed by a PRISMA-guided Systematic Evidence Based Approach (SSR in SEBA).
A total of 1124 abstracts were reviewed, 63 full-text articles were appraised and 69 articles were included. Five key domains were identified: 1) mentor qualities, 2) training structure, 3) content, 4) outcomes, and 5) obstacles.
This SSR in SEBA reiterates the critical role of mentor training and introduces evidence of its impact on the professional identity formation (PIF) of prospective mentors. It also highlights that more programs are employing longitudinal mentoring processes to guide the inculcation of desired mentoring characteristics amongst prospective mentors. These efforts to nurture the PIF of the prospective mentor-to better shape their future mentee's PIF-is novel and requires careful study.
医学教育中的有效指导有助于学员和导师的职业发展,改善患者护理和治疗结果,并提升主办机构的声誉。这一成功很大程度上由导师指导、评估和监督。然而,导师培训仍然不一致,支持不足,且评估往往不够充分。鉴于导师培训是指导计划的一个重要方面,我们建议进行一项综述,以梳理当前导师培训的特点和方法,希望能促进拟议指导计划的有效设计。
在PubMed、Scopus、Embase、PsycINFO和CINAHL数据库中检索2000年1月1日至2024年3月31日期间发表的关于医学教育中导师培训计划的文章。这项系统的范围综述采用基于循证方法的PRISMA指南(SEBA中的SSR)进行指导。
共审查了1124篇摘要,评估了63篇全文文章,纳入了69篇文章。确定了五个关键领域:1)导师素质,2)培训结构,3)内容,4)结果,5)障碍。
SEBA中的这项SSR重申了导师培训的关键作用,并介绍了其对未来导师职业身份形成(PIF)的影响证据。它还强调,越来越多的项目采用纵向指导流程,以引导未来导师培养所需的指导特质。这些培养未来导师PIF的努力——以更好地塑造他们未来学员的PIF——是新颖的,需要仔细研究。