Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Radiology. 2012 Jan;262(1):305-13. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110372.
To assess the effect of a computer-assisted detection (CAD) prototype on observer performance for detection of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) with computed tomographic (CT) pulmonary angiography.
In this institutional review board-approved retrospective study, six observers with varying experience evaluated 158 PE-negative and 51 PE-positive CT pulmonary angiographic studies (mean age, 57 years; 111 women, 98 men) obtained consecutively during nights and weekends. Observers were asked to determine the presence of PE and to rank their diagnostic confidence without CAD and subsequently with CAD within a single reading session. Reading time was separately measured for both readings. Reader data were compared with an independent standard established by two readers, with a third in case of discordant results. Statistical evaluation was performed on a per-patient basis by using logistic regression for repeated measurements and Pearson correlation.
With CAD, there was a significant increase in readers' sensitivity (P = .014) without loss of specificity (P = .853) on a per-patient basis. CAD assisted the readers in correcting an initial false-negative diagnosis in 15 cases, with the most proximal embolus at the segmental level in four cases and at the subsegmental level in 11 cases. In eight cases, readers accepted false-positive CAD candidate lesions on scans negative for PE, and in one case, a reader dismissed a true-positive finding. Reading time was extended by a mean of 22 seconds with the use of CAD.
At the expense of increased reading time, CAD has the potential to increase reader sensitivity for detecting segmental and subsegmental PE without significant loss of specificity.
评估计算机辅助检测 (CAD) 原型对 CT 肺动脉造影检测急性肺栓塞 (PE) 的观察者性能的影响。
在这项获得机构审查委员会批准的回顾性研究中,6 名经验不同的观察者评估了 158 例 PE 阴性和 51 例 PE 阳性 CT 肺动脉造影研究(平均年龄 57 岁;111 名女性,98 名男性),这些研究是在夜间和周末连续获得的。要求观察者确定是否存在 PE,并在没有 CAD 和随后在单个阅读会话中使用 CAD 的情况下对其诊断信心进行排名。分别测量两次阅读的阅读时间。读者数据与由两位读者建立的独立标准进行比较,如果结果不一致,则由第三位读者进行比较。统计评估是在每个患者的基础上进行的,使用逻辑回归进行重复测量和 Pearson 相关分析。
使用 CAD,在每个患者的基础上,读者的敏感性显著提高(P =.014),特异性没有损失(P =.853)。CAD 有助于读者纠正最初的假阴性诊断,在 15 例中,近端栓子位于段水平,在 4 例中位于亚段水平,在 11 例中位于亚段水平。在 8 例中,读者接受了扫描阴性的 PE 中 CAD 候选假阳性病变,在 1 例中,读者排除了真正的阳性发现。使用 CAD 时,阅读时间平均延长了 22 秒。
在增加阅读时间的情况下,CAD 有可能在不显著降低特异性的情况下提高读者检测节段性和亚段性 PE 的敏感性。