• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国医疗纠纷第三方调解机制评估

Evaluation of the third-party mediation mechanism for medical disputes in China.

作者信息

Zhao Min

机构信息

HuBei University of Chinese Medicine China.

出版信息

Med Law. 2011 Sep;30(3):401-15.

PMID:22191328
Abstract

Medical disputes have been increasing in recent years in China, which cause growing tension between doctors and patients. In many locations, it has started as a practice of exploring diversified dispute settlement methods. Great importance has been attached to the non-lawsuit model through third-party mediation, which might have been led by professional organizations, insurance companies, People's Mediation Committees, or three-level governmental authorities. Those have contributed to a rapid effective resolution of medical disputes. However, there are some deficiencies that need to be addressed and fixed up, thus calling for improvement, such as the lack of a sustainable supporting mechanism, unclear legal status of the mediation institutions and mediation agreements, patching up a quarrel by only compensation.

摘要

近年来,中国的医疗纠纷不断增加,这导致医患关系日益紧张。在许多地方,已经开始探索多元化的纠纷解决方式。第三方调解的非诉讼模式受到高度重视,这种调解可能由专业组织、保险公司、人民调解委员会或三级政府部门主导。这些措施有助于快速有效地解决医疗纠纷。然而,仍存在一些需要解决和完善的不足之处,因此需要改进,比如缺乏可持续的支持机制、调解机构和调解协议的法律地位不明确、仅通过赔偿来平息争端。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the third-party mediation mechanism for medical disputes in China.中国医疗纠纷第三方调解机制评估
Med Law. 2011 Sep;30(3):401-15.
2
Analysis of the characteristics, efficiency, and influencing factors of third-party mediation mechanisms for resolving medical disputes in public hospitals in China.分析中国公立医院解决医疗纠纷第三方调解机制的特点、效率及影响因素。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 9;24(1):1823. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19366-0.
3
Application of third-party mediation for medical disputes: an introduction of Chinese experience.第三方调解在医疗纠纷中的应用:中国经验介绍
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(14):2707-10.
4
The role of mediation in solving medical disputes in China.调解在中国解决医疗纠纷中的作用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 18;20(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5044-7.
5
[The research to improve the people's mediation mechanism of medical dispute of Beijing].[关于完善北京医疗纠纷人民调解机制的研究]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 May 13;94(18):1377-9.
6
The practice of mediation to resolve clinical, bioethical, and medical malpractice disputes.通过调解来解决临床、生物伦理和医疗事故纠纷的做法。
Hong Kong Med J. 2015 Dec;21(6):560-4. doi: 10.12809/hkmj154615.
7
Mediation as an opportunity in disputes relating to compensation for adverse medical events - international experiences.调解作为医疗不良事件赔偿纠纷中的一个契机——国际经验
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2020 Oct 23;48(287):375-378.
8
The positive and negative effects of anger on dispute resolution: evidence from electronically mediated disputes.愤怒对争端解决的正负效应:来自电子媒介争端的证据
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Apr;89(2):369-76. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.369.
9
[Mediation in health].[健康领域的调解]
Orv Hetil. 2008 Feb 10;149(6):265-9. doi: 10.1556/OH.2008.28235.
10
A mediation/medical advisory panel model for resolving disputes about end-of-life care.一种用于解决临终关怀纠纷的调解/医学咨询小组模式。
J Clin Ethics. 2002 Fall;13(3):188-202.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the characteristics, efficiency, and influencing factors of third-party mediation mechanisms for resolving medical disputes in public hospitals in China.分析中国公立医院解决医疗纠纷第三方调解机制的特点、效率及影响因素。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 9;24(1):1823. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19366-0.
2
Medical Dispute Cases Caused by Errors in Clinical Reasoning: An Investigation and Analysis.临床推理错误引发的医疗纠纷案例:一项调查与分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 7;10(11):2224. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112224.
3
What are the Bad Habits and Behaviors of Inconsiderate Doctors in Chinese Inhabitants' Mind? A Cross-Sectional Study.
中国居民心目中不体贴医生的不良习惯和行为有哪些?一项横断面研究。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Apr 6;15:583-595. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S358680. eCollection 2022.
4
Violence against healthcare workers and other serious responses to medical disputes in China: surveys of patients at 12 public hospitals.中国针对医护人员的暴力行为和其他严重医疗纠纷应对措施:对 12 家公立医院患者的调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 26;20(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05104-w.
5
Analysis of current situation and influencing factor of medical disputes among different levels of medical institutions based on the game theory in Xiamen of China: A cross-sectional survey.基于博弈论对中国厦门不同级别医疗机构医疗纠纷现状及影响因素的分析:一项横断面调查
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(38):e12501. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012501.
6
Turnover intention and related factors among general practitioners in Hubei, China: a cross-sectional study.中国湖北全科医生离职意愿及其相关因素:一项横断面研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 May 24;19(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0752-3.
7
Preventing surgical disputes through early detection and intervention: a case control study in China.通过早期发现和干预预防手术纠纷:中国的一项病例对照研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 22;15:5. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0671-5.
8
Prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms and related risk factors among physicians in China: a cross-sectional study.中国医生焦虑和抑郁症状的患病率及相关危险因素:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 22;9(7):e103242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103242. eCollection 2014.