• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过早期发现和干预预防手术纠纷:中国的一项病例对照研究

Preventing surgical disputes through early detection and intervention: a case control study in China.

作者信息

Xu Ping, Fan Zhenlin, Li Ting, Wang Lijie, Sun Qingwen, Du Xia, Lian Bin, Zhang Lulu

机构信息

Department of Health Service Management, Second Military Medical University, 800 Xiangyin Road, 200433, Shanghai, China.

Department of Medical Education, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 22;15:5. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0671-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-014-0671-5
PMID:25608604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4312442/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medical disputes have become a serious issue in China. A crisis cannot usually be predicted and managed through a cost-benefit strategy; therefore, researchers believe that prevention is better than containment and post-crisis resolution. This study aimed to identify solutions to prevent medical disputes in surgical cases through early warning and intervention of potential cases.

METHODS

A case-control study was conducted to identify early detection indicators of medical disputes in the surgical treatment of liver cancer through Delphi consultation and logistic regression on the basis of which interventions were undertaken to prevent potential cases.

RESULTS

The dispute detection model was composed of patient age (P = 0.08), frequency of hospitalization (P = 0.003), length of hospital stay (P < 0.001), terminal condition (P = 0.004), unplanned reoperation (P = 0.048), blood transfusion volume (P = 0.006), and arrearage (P < 0.001). Risk management interventions through quality improvement and enhanced communication in cases with an abnormal performance indicator proved effective in practice.

CONCLUSIONS

This study explored the use of an evidence-based medical risk management strategy for medical disputes that involved early detection and intervention and could potentially be adopted by hospitals to prevent medical disputes.

摘要

背景

医疗纠纷在中国已成为一个严重问题。危机通常无法通过成本效益策略来预测和管理;因此,研究人员认为预防胜于控制和危机后解决。本研究旨在通过对潜在病例的早期预警和干预,确定预防外科病例医疗纠纷的解决方案。

方法

进行了一项病例对照研究,通过德尔菲咨询和逻辑回归确定肝癌手术治疗中医疗纠纷的早期检测指标,并在此基础上采取干预措施以预防潜在病例。

结果

纠纷检测模型由患者年龄(P = 0.08)、住院频率(P = 0.003)、住院时间(P < 0.001)、终末期状况(P = 0.004)、非计划再次手术(P = 0.048)、输血量(P = 0.006)和欠费(P < 0.001)组成。在绩效指标异常的病例中,通过质量改进和加强沟通进行风险管理干预在实践中被证明是有效的。

结论

本研究探索了一种基于证据的医疗风险管理策略用于医疗纠纷,该策略涉及早期检测和干预,医院有可能采用该策略来预防医疗纠纷。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeb7/4312442/46b5bf7875e8/12913_2014_671_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeb7/4312442/156575d40b19/12913_2014_671_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeb7/4312442/46b5bf7875e8/12913_2014_671_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeb7/4312442/156575d40b19/12913_2014_671_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeb7/4312442/46b5bf7875e8/12913_2014_671_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Preventing surgical disputes through early detection and intervention: a case control study in China.通过早期发现和干预预防手术纠纷:中国的一项病例对照研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 22;15:5. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0671-5.
2
Model testing on the crisis interventions and actions to prevent medical disputes: a Taiwanese nursing perspective.从台湾护理视角看预防医疗纠纷的危机干预与行动的模型测试
J Clin Nurs. 2006 May;15(5):554-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01365.x.
3
Analysis of current situation and influencing factor of medical disputes among different levels of medical institutions based on the game theory in Xiamen of China: A cross-sectional survey.基于博弈论对中国厦门不同级别医疗机构医疗纠纷现状及影响因素的分析:一项横断面调查
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(38):e12501. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012501.
4
Characteristics of medical disputes arising from dental practice in Guangzhou, China: an observational study.中国广州牙科医疗纠纷的特征:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 8;8(2):e018738. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018738.
5
Impact of miscommunication in medical dispute cases in Japan.日本医疗纠纷案件中沟通失误的影响。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Oct;20(5):358-62. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn028. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
6
Diagnostic errors in fatal medical malpractice cases in Shanghai, China: 1990-2015.中国上海1990 - 2015年致命医疗事故案例中的诊断错误
Diagn Pathol. 2019 Jan 31;14(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13000-019-0785-5.
7
Crisis management policies and programs to prevent nursing-related medical disputes in Taiwanese hospitals.台湾地区医院预防护理相关医疗纠纷的危机管理政策与方案
Nurs Econ. 2005 Sep-Oct;23(5):239-47, 211.
8
A taxonomy of Chinese hospitals and application to medical dispute resolutions.中国医院分类及其在医疗纠纷解决中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 29;12(1):18234. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23147-3.
9
Study of the factors causing medical disputes in a Third-Level Grade A Hospital in Shanghai.上海某三级甲等医院医疗纠纷成因研究
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018 Oct;33(4):e1137-e1146. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2599. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
10
The Association of Market Mix of Hospital Ownership With Medical Disputes: Evidence From China.医院所有权的市场组合与医疗纠纷的关联:来自中国的证据。
Inquiry. 2020 Jan-Dec;57:46958020971403. doi: 10.1177/0046958020971403.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving surgical quality of care: learning from 8,331 surgical medical malpractice cases.提高外科医疗质量:从8331例外科医疗事故案例中吸取经验教训。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Dec 10;11:1486451. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1486451. eCollection 2024.
2
Analysis of the characteristics and risk factors affecting the judgment results of medical damage liability disputes in 3172 second-instance and retrial cases in China.分析中国 3172 例二审和再审医疗损害责任纠纷判断结果的特点和影响因素。
Hum Resour Health. 2023 Jun 29;21(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12960-023-00832-6.
3
Medical Dispute Cases Caused by Errors in Clinical Reasoning: An Investigation and Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Appeal from Chinese doctors to end violence.中国医生呼吁停止暴力行为。
Lancet. 2013 Nov 23;382(9906):1703-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62401-0.
2
Violence against doctors in China.中国针对医生的暴力行为。
BMJ. 2012 Sep 7;345:e5730. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5730.
3
Application of case classification in healthcare quality assessment in China.病例分类在我国医疗质量评估中的应用。
临床推理错误引发的医疗纠纷案例:一项调查与分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 7;10(11):2224. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112224.
4
The role of mediation in solving medical disputes in China.调解在中国解决医疗纠纷中的作用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 18;20(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5044-7.
Health Inf Manag. 2012;41(2):22-9. doi: 10.1177/183335831204100203.
4
Ending violence against doctors in China.终结中国针对医生的暴力行为。
Lancet. 2012 May 12;379(9828):1764. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60729-6.
5
Evaluation of the third-party mediation mechanism for medical disputes in China.中国医疗纠纷第三方调解机制评估
Med Law. 2011 Sep;30(3):401-15.
6
Chinese doctors are under threat.中国医生正受到威胁。
Lancet. 2010 Aug 28;376(9742):657. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61315-3.
7
Impact of miscommunication in medical dispute cases in Japan.日本医疗纠纷案件中沟通失误的影响。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Oct;20(5):358-62. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn028. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
8
How can nurses help patients work more effectively with nurses to improve the safety of patient care?护士如何帮助患者更有效地与护士合作,以提高患者护理的安全性?
Nurs Econ. 2004 Mar-Apr;22(2):100-2, 70.
9
Risk management in obstetric care for family physicians: results of a 10-year project.家庭医生产科护理中的风险管理:一项为期10年项目的结果
J Am Board Fam Pract. 2003 Nov-Dec;16(6):471-7. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.16.6.471.
10
Hospitals' behavior in a tort crisis: observations from Pennsylvania.医院在侵权危机中的行为:来自宾夕法尼亚州的观察
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Nov-Dec;22(6):225-33. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.6.225.