Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2012 Oct-Dec;26(4):344-51. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3182420bdf.
Subjective cognitive complaints (SCCs) are increasingly a focus in studies on prodromal Alzheimer disease (AD) and risk for dementia. Little is known about the optimal approach to measure SCCs. We used item response theory (IRT) to examine the characteristics of 24 SCC items in a sample of 3495 older adults pooled from 4 community-based studies. We investigated the potential advantages of IRT scoring over conventional scoring on the basis of participants' item response patterns. Items most likely endorsed by individuals low in SCC severity relate to word retrieval and general subjective memory decline. Items likely endorsed only by individuals high in SCC severity relate to nonepisodic memory changes, such as decline in comprehension, judgment and executive functions, praxis and procedural memory, and social behavior changes. Above and beyond conventional total score, IRT scoring of SCCs was associated with performance on objective cognitive tests, and was associated with cognitive test performance among participants endorsing only 1 SCC item. Thus, IRT scoring captures additional information beyond a simple sum of SCC symptoms. Modern psychometric approaches including IRT may be useful in developing: (1) brief community screening questionnaires; and (2) more sensitive measures of very subtle subjective decline for use in prodromal Alzheimer disease research.
主观认知主诉 (SCCs) 越来越成为前驱性阿尔茨海默病 (AD) 和痴呆风险研究的重点。对于测量 SCCs 的最佳方法,我们知之甚少。我们使用项目反应理论 (IRT) 来检查来自 4 项基于社区的研究的 3495 名老年受试者样本中的 24 项 SCC 项目的特征。我们根据参与者的项目反应模式,调查了 IRT 评分相对于传统评分的潜在优势。SCC 严重程度低的个体最有可能认可的项目与单词检索和一般主观记忆减退有关。SCC 严重程度高的个体可能只认可与非情节记忆变化相关的项目,例如理解、判断和执行功能、实践和程序性记忆以及社会行为变化的下降。超越传统的总分,SCC 的 IRT 评分与客观认知测试的表现相关,并且与仅认可 1 项 SCC 项目的参与者的认知测试表现相关。因此,IRT 评分除了 SCC 症状的简单总和之外,还可以捕捉到额外的信息。包括 IRT 在内的现代心理计量学方法可能有助于开发:(1)简短的社区筛查问卷;(2)更敏感的用于前驱性 AD 研究的非常微妙的主观衰退测量方法。