• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An empirically derived taxonomy for personality diagnosis: bridging science and practice in conceptualizing personality.人格诊断的经验分类法:在概念化人格方面连接科学与实践。
Am J Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;169(3):273-84. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11020274.
2
An empirically derived classification of adolescent personality disorders.青少年人格障碍的实证分类。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 May;53(5):528-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2013.12.030. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
3
Personality diagnoses in adolescence: DSM-IV axis II diagnoses and an empirically derived alternative.青少年期的人格诊断:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》轴II诊断及一种基于实证得出的替代方法。
Am J Psychiatry. 2003 May;160(5):952-66. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.5.952.
4
Revising and assessing axis II, Part II: toward an empirically based and clinically useful classification of personality disorders.修订与评估第二轴,第二部分:迈向基于实证且临床实用的人格障碍分类
Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Feb;156(2):273-85. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.2.273.
5
Dimensions of personality pathology: an alternative to the five-factor model.人格病理学维度:五因素模型的替代方案
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;161(10):1743-54. doi: 10.1176/ajp.161.10.1743.
6
Refining personality disorder diagnosis: integrating science and practice.完善人格障碍诊断:整合科学与实践。
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Aug;161(8):1350-65. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.8.1350.
7
Dimensions of personality and personality pathology: factor structure of the Shedler-Westen assessment procedure-II (SWAP-II).人格与人格病理学的维度:谢德勒-韦斯顿评估程序-II(SWAP-II)的因素结构。
J Pers Disord. 2014 Apr;28(2):281-318. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2012_26_059. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
8
Refining the construct of narcissistic personality disorder: diagnostic criteria and subtypes.完善自恋型人格障碍的概念:诊断标准与亚型
Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Nov;165(11):1473-81. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07030376. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
9
Revising and assessing axis II, Part I: developing a clinically and empirically valid assessment method.修订与评估第二轴,第一部分:开发一种临床和实证有效的评估方法。
Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Feb;156(2):258-72. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.2.258.
10
Refining a complex diagnostic construct: subtyping Dysthymia with the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure-II.精炼一个复杂的诊断结构:使用 Shedler-Westen 评估程序 II 对心境恶劣障碍进行亚型划分。
J Affect Disord. 2014 Jan;152-154:186-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.09.008. Epub 2013 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
A Data Set of Synthetic Utterances for Computational Personality Analysis.用于计算人格分析的合成话语数据集。
Sci Data. 2024 Jun 13;11(1):623. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03488-6.
2
Personality Disorders in Childhood: Validity of the Coolidge Personality and Neuropsychological Inventory for Children (CPNI).儿童期人格障碍:Coolidge 人格和神经心理学儿童量表(CPNI)的效度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 29;19(7):4050. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074050.
3
Applying the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders and the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure to the Classic Case of "Madeline G.": Novice and Expert Rater Convergences and Divergence.将《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格障碍替代模型及谢德勒-韦斯顿评估程序应用于“玛德琳·G.”的经典案例:新手与专家评分者的一致性和分歧
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 15;13:794616. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.794616. eCollection 2022.
4
Extreme Rare Events Identification Through Jaynes Inferential Approach.通过 Jaynes 推断方法识别极端罕见事件。
Big Data. 2021 Dec;9(6):417-426. doi: 10.1089/big.2021.0191. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
5
From a Symptom-Based to a Person-Centered Approach in Treating Depressive Disorders in Adolescence: A Clinical Case Formulation Using the (PDM-2)'s Framework.从基于症状的方法到以患者为中心的方法治疗青少年抑郁障碍:使用(PDM-2)框架的临床病例构想。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 27;18(19):10127. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910127.
6
The Mediator Effect of Personality on the Relationship Between Symptomatic Impairment and Treatment Outcome in Eating Disorders.人格在饮食失调症的症状损害与治疗结果关系中的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 2;12:688924. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.688924. eCollection 2021.
7
Childhood Personality Assessment Q-Sort (CPAP-Q): A Clinically and Empirically Procedure for Assessing Traits and Emerging Patterns of Personality in Childhood.儿童人格评估 Q 分类法(CPAP-Q):一种用于评估儿童人格特质和新兴模式的临床和实证方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 10;18(12):6288. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126288.
8
Psychotherapists' emotional reactions to patients' personality trait in personality disorder treatment settings: an exploratory study.治疗人格障碍时心理治疗师对患者人格特质的情绪反应:一项探索性研究。
BMC Psychol. 2021 May 6;9(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00580-z.
9
Intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy provided by novice psychotherapists: effects on symptomatology and psychological structure in patients with anxiety disorders.新手心理治疗师提供的强化短期动态心理治疗:对焦虑症患者症状学和心理结构的影响。
Res Psychother. 2021 Apr 2;24(1):503. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2021.503. eCollection 2021 Mar 31.
10
ICD-11 Personality Disorders: A Psychodynamic Perspective on Personality Functioning.《国际疾病分类第11版》人格障碍:关于人格功能的精神动力学视角
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 16;12:654026. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.654026. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Prototype Personality Diagnosis in Clinical Practice: A Viable Alternative for DSM-V and ICD-11.临床实践中的原型人格诊断:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版和《国际疾病分类》第十一版的可行替代方案
Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2010 Dec;41(6):482-487. doi: 10.1037/a0021555.
2
Agreement between clinician and patient ratings of adaptive functioning and developmental history.临床医生和患者对适应功能和发育史的评估之间的一致性。
Am J Psychiatry. 2010 Dec;167(12):1472-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09101489. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
3
The role of antisociality in the psychopathy construct: comment on Skeem and Cooke (2010).反社会性在精神病态结构中的作用:对 Skeem 和 Cooke(2010)的评论。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):446-54. doi: 10.1037/a0013635.
4
Inter-rater reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID I) and Axis II Disorders (SCID II).DSM-IV 轴 I 障碍(SCID I)和轴 II 障碍(SCID II)的结构性临床访谈的评定者间信度。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011 Jan-Feb;18(1):75-9. doi: 10.1002/cpp.693.
5
Can clinicians recognize DSM-IV personality disorders from five-factor model descriptions of patient cases?临床医生能否从患者病例的五因素模型描述中识别出《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)中的人格障碍?
Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;166(4):427-33. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08070972. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
6
Questioning the coherence of histrionic personality disorder: borderline and hysterical personality subtypes in adults and adolescents.质疑表演型人格障碍的连贯性:成人及青少年中的边缘型和癔症型人格亚型
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008 Nov;196(11):785-97. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31818b502d.
7
Refining the construct of narcissistic personality disorder: diagnostic criteria and subtypes.完善自恋型人格障碍的概念:诊断标准与亚型
Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Nov;165(11):1473-81. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07030376. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
8
Clinical utility of five dimensional systems for personality diagnosis: a "consumer preference" study.五维人格诊断系统的临床效用:一项“消费者偏好”研究。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008 May;196(5):356-74. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181710950.
9
Personality diagnosis with the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP): integrating clinical and statistical measurement and prediction.使用谢德勒-韦斯顿评估程序(SWAP)进行人格诊断:整合临床与统计测量及预测
J Abnorm Psychol. 2007 Nov;116(4):810-822. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.116.4.810.
10
The Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP): making personality diagnosis clinically meaningful.谢德勒-韦斯顿评估程序(SWAP):使人格诊断具有临床意义。
J Pers Assess. 2007 Aug;89(1):41-55. doi: 10.1080/00223890701357092.

人格诊断的经验分类法:在概念化人格方面连接科学与实践。

An empirically derived taxonomy for personality diagnosis: bridging science and practice in conceptualizing personality.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, USA.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;169(3):273-84. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11020274.

DOI:10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11020274
PMID:22193534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4546840/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The authors describe a system for diagnosing personality pathology that is empirically derived, clinically relevant, and practical for day-to-day use.

METHOD

A random national sample of psychiatrists and clinical psychologists (N=1,201) described a randomly selected current patient with any degree of personality dysfunction (from minimal to severe) using the descriptors in the Shedler-Westen Assessment Procedure–II and completed additional research forms.

RESULTS

The authors applied factor analysis to identify naturally occurring diagnostic groupings within the patient sample. The analysis yielded 10 clinically coherent personality diagnoses organized into three higher-order clusters: internalizing, externalizing, and borderline-dysregulated. The authors selected the most highly rated descriptors to construct a diagnostic prototype for each personality syndrome. In a second, independent sample, research interviewers and patients' treating clinicians were able to diagnose the personality syndromes with high agreement and minimal comorbidity among diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

The empirically derived personality prototypes described here provide a framework for personality diagnosis that is both empirically based and clinically relevant.

摘要

目的

作者描述了一种人格病理学诊断系统,该系统具有经验性、临床相关性,并且适用于日常使用。

方法

一组随机的精神科医生和临床心理学家(N=1201)使用 Shedler-Westen 评估程序-II 的描述符描述了一名随机选择的当前具有一定程度人格障碍(从轻微到严重)的患者,并完成了其他研究表格。

结果

作者应用因子分析在患者样本中识别自然发生的诊断分组。该分析产生了 10 种临床上一致的人格诊断,分为三个高阶聚类:内化、外化和边缘失调。作者选择了评价最高的描述符来构建每个人格综合征的诊断原型。在第二个独立的样本中,研究访谈者和患者的治疗临床医生能够以较高的一致性和最小的诊断间共病来诊断人格综合征。

结论

这里描述的经验衍生的人格原型为基于经验和临床相关的人格诊断提供了一个框架。