• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床实践中的原型人格诊断:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版和《国际疾病分类》第十一版的可行替代方案

Prototype Personality Diagnosis in Clinical Practice: A Viable Alternative for DSM-V and ICD-11.

作者信息

Westen Drew, Defife Jared A, Bradley Bekh, Hilsenroth Mark J

机构信息

Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University.

出版信息

Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2010 Dec;41(6):482-487. doi: 10.1037/a0021555.

DOI:10.1037/a0021555
PMID:21532930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3083068/
Abstract

Several studies suggest that a prototype matching approach yields diagnoses of comparable validity to the more complex diagnostic algorithms outlined in DSM-IV. Furthermore, clinicians prefer prototype diagnosis of personality disorders (PDs) to the current categorical diagnostic system or alternative dimensional methods. An important extension of this work is to investigate the degree to which clinicians are able to make prototype diagnoses reliably. The aim of this study is to assess the inter-rater reliability of a prototype matching approach to personality diagnosis in clinical practice. Using prototypes derived empirically in prior research, outpatient clinicians diagnosed patients' personality after an initial evaluation period. External evaluators independently diagnosed the same patients after watching videotapes of the same clinical hours. Inter-rater reliability for prototype diagnosis was high, with a median r = .72. Cross-correlations between disorders were low, with a median r = .01. Clinicians and clinically trained independent observers can assess complex personality constellations with high reliability using a simple prototype matching procedure, even with prototypes that are relatively unfamiliar to them. In light of its demonstrated reliability, efficiency, and versatility, prototype diagnosis appears to be a viable system for DSM-V and ICD-11 with exceptional utility for research and clinical practice.

摘要

多项研究表明,原型匹配法得出的诊断结果与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)中概述的更复杂的诊断算法具有相当的效度。此外,与当前的分类诊断系统或替代的维度方法相比,临床医生更喜欢人格障碍(PDs)的原型诊断。这项工作的一个重要扩展是调查临床医生能够可靠地进行原型诊断的程度。本研究的目的是评估临床实践中人格诊断的原型匹配法的评分者间信度。使用先前研究中凭经验得出的原型,门诊临床医生在初始评估期后对患者的人格进行诊断。外部评估者在观看相同临床时段的录像带后,独立对相同患者进行诊断。原型诊断的评分者间信度很高,中位数r = 0.72。各障碍之间的交叉相关性很低,中位数r = 0.01。临床医生和经过临床培训的独立观察者可以使用简单的原型匹配程序,以高信度评估复杂的人格特征,即使是使用他们相对不熟悉的原型。鉴于其已证明的信度、效率和通用性,原型诊断似乎是《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-V)和《国际疾病分类》第11版(ICD-11)的一个可行系统,对研究和临床实践具有特殊用途。

相似文献

1
Prototype Personality Diagnosis in Clinical Practice: A Viable Alternative for DSM-V and ICD-11.临床实践中的原型人格诊断:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版和《国际疾病分类》第十一版的可行替代方案
Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2010 Dec;41(6):482-487. doi: 10.1037/a0021555.
2
Validity of prototype diagnosis for mood and anxiety disorders.原型诊断在心境和焦虑障碍中的有效性。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Feb;70(2):140-8. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.270.
3
Validity and clinical utility of DSM and empirically derived prototype diagnosis for personality disorders in predicting adaptive functioning.DSM 和经验衍生原型诊断人格障碍在预测适应功能方面的有效性和临床实用性。
Personal Disord. 2019 Mar;10(2):105-113. doi: 10.1037/per0000293. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
4
Reliability of DSM and empirically derived prototype diagnosis for mood, anxiety and personality disorders.DSM 诊断和经验衍生原型诊断在心境、焦虑和人格障碍中的可靠性。
Compr Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;85:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 9.
5
A critique of the proposed prototype rating system for personality disorders in DSM-5.对 DSM-5 中提议的人格障碍原型评定系统的批判。
J Pers Disord. 2011 Apr;25(2):206-21. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.2.206.
6
Validity and clinical utility of DSM and prototype diagnosis for depressive and anxiety spectrum disorders in predicting adaptive functioning.DSM 和原型诊断对抑郁和焦虑谱系障碍预测适应功能的有效性和临床实用性。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Dec;270:50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.09.010. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
7
A prototype approach to personality disorder diagnosis.一种人格障碍诊断的原型方法。
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 May;163(5):846-56. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.5.846.
8
[Preliminary comparative study of the personality disorder evaluation DIP instrument with the semi-structured SCID-II interview].[人格障碍评估工具DIP与半结构化访谈SCID-II的初步比较研究]
Encephale. 2009 Dec;35(6):544-53. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.09.007.
9
Clinical utility of five dimensional systems for personality diagnosis: a "consumer preference" study.五维人格诊断系统的临床效用:一项“消费者偏好”研究。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008 May;196(5):356-74. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181710950.
10
Prototype Models of Personality Disorders: Prototype Convergence and Association With Pathological Traits.人格障碍的原型模型:原型趋同及与病理性特质的关联
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2025 Jan-Feb;32(1):e70034. doi: 10.1002/cpp.70034.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in the Anaclitic-Introjective Personality Configurations Following Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy with Young Adults.针对年轻成年人进行精神分析心理治疗后,依恋-内投性人格结构的变化。
Res Psychother. 2017 Apr 13;20(1):239. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2017.239.
2
Accuracy of proactive case finding for mental disorders by community informants in Nepal.尼泊尔社区信息提供者对精神障碍进行主动病例发现的准确性。
Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;207(6):501-6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.141077. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
3
Clinical validity of prototype personality disorder ratings in adolescents.青少年原型人格障碍评定的临床效度
J Pers Assess. 2015;97(3):271-7. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2014.979493. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
4
Convergent and incremental predictive validity of clinician, self-report, and structured interview diagnoses for personality disorders over 5 years.5 年内临床医生诊断、自我报告和结构化访谈诊断人格障碍的会聚和增量预测效度。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Aug;81(4):650-659. doi: 10.1037/a0032813. Epub 2013 May 6.
5
An empirically derived approach to the classification and diagnosis of mood disorders.一种基于经验的情绪障碍分类和诊断方法。
World Psychiatry. 2012 Oct;11(3):172-80. doi: 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2012.tb00127.x.
6
Prototype diagnosis of psychiatric syndromes.精神综合征的原型诊断。
World Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;11(1):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.01.004.
7
An empirically derived taxonomy for personality diagnosis: bridging science and practice in conceptualizing personality.人格诊断的经验分类法:在概念化人格方面连接科学与实践。
Am J Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;169(3):273-84. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11020274.

本文引用的文献

1
The future of personality disorders in DSM-V?《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版中人格障碍的未来走向?
Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;166(4):388-91. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09010090.
2
Can clinicians recognize DSM-IV personality disorders from five-factor model descriptions of patient cases?临床医生能否从患者病例的五因素模型描述中识别出《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)中的人格障碍?
Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;166(4):427-33. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08070972. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
3
Clinical utility of five dimensional systems for personality diagnosis: a "consumer preference" study.五维人格诊断系统的临床效用:一项“消费者偏好”研究。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008 May;196(5):356-74. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181710950.
4
Clinical assessment of pathological personality traits.病理性人格特质的临床评估
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Jul;163(7):1285-7. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.7.1285.
5
A prototype approach to personality disorder diagnosis.一种人格障碍诊断的原型方法。
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 May;163(5):846-56. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.5.846.
6
Clinical utility as a criterion for revising psychiatric diagnoses.作为修订精神科诊断标准的临床实用性
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;161(6):946-54. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.6.946.
7
Assessing personality disorders using a systematic clinical interview: evaluation of an alternative to structured interviews.使用系统临床访谈评估人格障碍:对结构化访谈替代方法的评估
J Pers Disord. 2003 Aug;17(4):351-69. doi: 10.1521/pedi.17.4.351.23967.
8
Clinical psychologists' theory-based representations of mental disorders predict their diagnostic reasoning and memory.临床心理学家基于理论的心理障碍表征会预测他们的诊断推理和记忆。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002 Dec;131(4):451-76.
9
Etiologic connections among substance dependence, antisocial behavior, and personality: modeling the externalizing spectrum.物质依赖、反社会行为和人格之间的病因学联系:对外显谱系进行建模
J Abnorm Psychol. 2002 Aug;111(3):411-24.
10
Toward DSM-V and the classification of psychopathology.迈向《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版及精神病理学分类
Psychol Bull. 2000 Nov;126(6):946-63. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.946.