Simmonds Nigel, Miller Peter, Gemmell Hugh
Anglo-European College of Chiropractic, 13-15 Parkwood Road, Bournemouth BH5 2DF, United Kingdom.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2012 Jan;16(1):83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2010.08.001. Epub 2010 Sep 27.
A theoretical framework for the role that fascia may play in apparently diverse passive manual therapies is presented. The relevant anatomy of fascia is briefly reviewed. Therapies are divided into myofascial ('soft tissue') and manipulative ('joint-based') and comparisons are made between them on a qualitative basis using measures of pain, function and 'autonomic activation'. When these three outcomes are evaluated between therapies it is observed that they are usually comparable in the quality, if not the quantity of the measures. Viewed from a patients' perspective alone the therapeutic benefits are hard to distinguish. It is proposed that a biologically plausible mechanism which may generate a significant component of the observed effects of manual therapies of all descriptions, is the therapeutic stimulation of fascia in its various forms within the body. Such considerations may help explain why diverse therapies apparently give comparable results.
本文提出了一个理论框架,阐述了筋膜在表面上多种多样的被动手法治疗中可能发挥的作用。简要回顾了筋膜的相关解剖结构。治疗方法分为肌筋膜(“软组织”)和手法(“基于关节”)两类,并使用疼痛、功能和“自主激活”指标,在定性基础上对两者进行比较。当在不同治疗方法之间评估这三个结果时,可以观察到,即使测量指标的数量不同,但其质量通常具有可比性。仅从患者的角度来看,治疗效果很难区分。有人提出,在体内以各种形式对筋膜进行治疗性刺激,可能是一种生物学上合理的机制,它能产生各种手法治疗所观察到的效果的一个重要组成部分。这些考虑因素可能有助于解释为什么不同的治疗方法显然能产生相似的结果。