Kim Yun Jeung, Goh Pyung Gohn, Kim Eui Sik, Lee Su Youn, Moon Hee Seok, Lee Eaum Seok, Sung Jae Kyu, Kim Seok Hyun, Lee Byung Seok, Jeong Hyun Yong
Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University, School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2011 Dec;58(6):311-7. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2011.58.6.311.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: We retrospectively analyzed comparative toxicities and efficacies of chemotherapy regimens in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients who achieved complete response (CR) after chemotherapy.
We reviewed the medical records of 1,203 patients, who were pathologically diagnosed as AGC in a single center between January 2001 and October 2007. On the basis of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, CR was evaluated with abdominal computed tomography. Toxicities were evaluated using the National Cancer Institute's common toxicity criteria before each chemotherapy cycle.
Among the 1,203 AGC patients enrolled in this study, 568 received chemotherapy and 635 received best supportive care. The major chemotherapy regimens were 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) and 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI). Among the 568 patients, 51 (9.0%) achieved CR (49 [8.6%] with FOLFOX [n=12], DCF [n=26], or FOLFIRI [n=11] and 2 [0.3%] with etoposide, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil). For patients administered FOLFOX, DCF, and FOLFIRI, the median time to disease progression was 4 months (range, 1.8-59.5), 15 months (range, 2.9-31.2) and 10 months (range, 2.0-39.5), and the median survival times were 48 months (range, 5.9-74.0), 37 months (range, 14.0-86.0), and 30 months (range, 6.0-50.0), respectively. Grades 3-4 mucositis occurred mostly in patients administered DCF (n=8, 30.8%). Grades 3-4 leucopenia were observed in 1 (8.3%), 11 (42.3%), and 4 (36.4%) patients administered FOLFOX, DCF and FOLFIRI, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed in the 3 regimens.
All 3 regimens (FOLFOX, DCF and FOLFIRI) were active and tolerable. Their efficacies and toxicities were not significantly different.
背景/目的:我们回顾性分析了晚期胃癌(AGC)患者化疗后达到完全缓解(CR)的化疗方案的相对毒性和疗效。
我们回顾了2001年1月至2007年10月在单一中心病理诊断为AGC的1203例患者的病历。根据实体瘤疗效评价标准,通过腹部计算机断层扫描评估CR。在每个化疗周期前使用美国国立癌症研究所的通用毒性标准评估毒性。
在本研究纳入的1203例AGC患者中,568例接受了化疗,635例接受了最佳支持治疗。主要化疗方案为氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙和奥沙利铂(FOLFOX)、多西他赛、顺铂和氟尿嘧啶(DCF)以及氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙和伊立替康(FOLFIRI)。在568例患者中,51例(9.0%)达到CR(49例[8.6%]采用FOLFOX[n = 12]、DCF[n = 26]或FOLFIRI[n = 11],2例[0.3%]采用依托泊苷、亚叶酸钙和氟尿嘧啶)。接受FOLFOX、DCF和FOLFIRI治疗的患者,疾病进展的中位时间分别为4个月(范围1.8 - 59.5)、15个月(范围2.9 - 31.2)和10个月(范围2.0 - 39.5),中位生存时间分别为48个月(范围5.9 - 74.0)、37个月(范围14.0 - 86.0)和30个月(范围6.0 - 50.0)。3 - 4级粘膜炎大多发生在接受DCF治疗的患者中(n = 8,30.8%)。接受FOLFOX、DCF和FOLFIRI治疗的患者中,分别有1例(8.3%)、11例(42.3%)和4例(36.4%)观察到3 - 4级白细胞减少。三种方案之间未观察到统计学显著差异。
所有三种方案(FOLFOX、DCF和FOLFIRI)均有效且耐受性良好。它们的疗效和毒性无显著差异。