• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多孔钽颈椎椎间融合器的失败:一项前瞻性、随机、多中心临床研究的两年结果。

Failure of porous tantalum cervical interbody fusion devices: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical study.

作者信息

Kasliwal Manish K, Baskin David S, Traynelis Vincent C

机构信息

Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Jul;26(5):239-45. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318241e70f.

DOI:10.1097/BSD.0b013e318241e70f
PMID:22198323
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of 2 novel cervical interbody fusion devices in the treatment of single-level degenerative cervical disk disease. Both devices were fabricated from a porous tantalum material. The high overall porosity of the devices was intended to facilitate anterior cervical interbody fusion.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, 3-armed, clinical study was initiated with the following treatment groups: porous tantalum ring device packed with autograft, porous tantalum block device, and iliac crest autograft control. All the patients had single-level symptomatic cervical disk disease that had failed to respond to nonoperative therapy. Clinical and radiographic data were collected preoperatively, during surgery, before hospital discharge, and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Six investigators participated in the clinical study at 6 investigational centers in the United States. Enrollment into the study was terminated after 39 patients had been accrued because of concerns over delayed fusion in the porous tantalum treatment groups. Of the 39 patients enrolled into the clinical study, 11 patients received the control treatment of iliac autograft fusion, 13 patients received the porous tantalum ring device with the center cavity packed with cancellous iliac crest autograft, and 15 patients received the porous tantalum block device. These patients were evaluated for 24 months as per the study protocol. There were no significant differences in any of the patient demographic variables collected. The mean operative times for both the ring and block device groups were slightly lower than the control treatment. Two patients in the block treatment group were determined to be nonunion between the 6- and 12-month time points and underwent additional surgery. Five patients with porous tantalum devices showed radiographic evidence of device fragmentation, and one patient in addition had radiographic evidence of erosion of the involved vertebral bodies by the device. One patient in the ring treatment group died from a myocardial infarction and kidney failure subsequent to the 12-month follow-up visit, which was unrelated to the device or the spinal fusion procedure. Fusion rate at 2 years for the tantalum device was very low as compared with the control arm (44% vs. 100%). Patient Neck Disability Index scores, Short Form-36 scores, and neurological status scores were similar between the 3 treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that stand-alone porous tantalum material is not ideal for a cervical spine interbody fusion because of the low rate of arthrodesis and the risk of device fragmentation in patients who fail to fuse.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是评估两种新型颈椎椎间融合器治疗单节段退变性颈椎间盘疾病的安全性和有效性。两种融合器均由多孔钽材料制成。融合器的高整体孔隙率旨在促进颈椎前路椎间融合。

方法

开展一项前瞻性、随机、三臂临床研究,设置以下治疗组:填充自体骨的多孔钽环装置、多孔钽块装置和髂嵴自体骨对照组。所有患者均患有单节段有症状的颈椎间盘疾病,且非手术治疗无效。在术前、手术期间、出院前以及术后6周、3个月、6个月、12个月和24个月收集临床和影像学数据。

结果

6名研究者在美国的6个研究中心参与了该临床研究。由于担心多孔钽治疗组融合延迟,在纳入39例患者后终止了研究入组。在纳入临床研究的39例患者中,11例患者接受了髂骨自体骨融合的对照治疗,13例患者接受了中心腔填充松质髂骨自体骨的多孔钽环装置,15例患者接受了多孔钽块装置。按照研究方案对这些患者进行了24个月的评估。所收集的任何患者人口统计学变量均无显著差异。环装置组和块装置组的平均手术时间均略低于对照治疗组。块治疗组有2例患者在6至12个月时间点被判定为骨不连,并接受了额外手术。5例使用多孔钽装置的患者显示有装置碎裂的影像学证据,1例患者还显示有装置对受累椎体侵蚀的影像学证据。环治疗组有1例患者在12个月随访后死于心肌梗死和肾衰竭,这与装置或脊柱融合手术无关。与对照组相比,钽装置2年时的融合率非常低(44%对100%)。3个治疗组之间的患者颈部功能障碍指数评分、简明健康状况调查36项评分和神经功能状态评分相似。

结论

本研究表明,单纯的多孔钽材料对于颈椎椎间融合并不理想,因为融合率低,且在未融合患者中有装置碎裂的风险。

相似文献

1
Failure of porous tantalum cervical interbody fusion devices: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical study.多孔钽颈椎椎间融合器的失败:一项前瞻性、随机、多中心临床研究的两年结果。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Jul;26(5):239-45. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318241e70f.
2
Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article.人工颈椎间盘的临床和影像学分析:Prestige 前瞻性随机对照临床试验 7 年随访:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Oct;21(4):516-28. doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE13996. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
3
Is anterior cervical fusion with a porous tantalum implant a cost-effective method to treat cervical disc disease with radiculopathy?前路颈椎融合术联合多孔钽植入物治疗伴有根性症状的颈椎病是否具有成本效益?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Sep 15;37(20):1734-41. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318255a184.
4
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2 with cylindrical interbody cages.使用重组人骨形态发生蛋白2与圆柱形椎间融合器进行腰椎后路椎间融合术。
Spine J. 2004 Sep-Oct;4(5):527-38; discussion 538-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.03.025.
5
Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.前瞻性、随机、多中心食品药品监督管理局关于CHARITE人工椎间盘与腰椎融合术治疗腰椎间盘置换的研究性器械豁免研究:五年随访
Spine J. 2009 May;9(5):374-86. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.08.007. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
6
Anterior cervical fusion with tantalum implant: a prospective randomized controlled study.前路颈椎融合术联合钽植入物:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Mar 1;33(5):465-72. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181657f49.
7
Clinical and radiological evaluation of Trabecular Metal and the Smith-Robinson technique in anterior cervical fusion for degenerative disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with 2-year follow-up.Trabecular Metal 和 Smith-Robinson 技术在前路颈椎融合治疗退行性疾病中的临床和影像学评估:一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究,随访 2 年。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Mar;19(3):464-73. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1161-z. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
8
Eleven-Year Follow-Up of Two Cohorts of Patients Comparing Stand-Alone Porous Tantalum Cage Versus Autologous Bone Graft and Plating in Anterior Cervical Fusions.对两组患者进行十一年随访,比较单独使用多孔钽笼与自体骨移植及钢板在前路颈椎融合术中的效果。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb;122:e156-e167. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.160. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
9
Polyetheretherketone interbody cages versus autogenous iliac crest bone grafts with anterior fixation for cervical disc disease.聚醚醚酮椎间融合器与自体髂嵴骨移植前路固定治疗颈椎间盘疾病的比较
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Apr;26(2):61-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182323274.
10
Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease: Long-term Changes in Sagittal Alignment and Their Clinical Implications After Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage Subsidence: A Prospective Study With Standalone Lordotic Tantalum Cages.退行性颈椎间盘疾病:颈椎椎间融合器下沉后矢状位排列的长期变化及其临床意义:一项关于单独使用前凸钽笼的前瞻性研究
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Jun;30(5):E648-E655. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000293.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of bony fusion after anterior cervical discectomy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.颈椎前路椎间盘切除术后骨融合的评估:一项系统文献综述和荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Apr 25;48(1):386. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03542-w.
2
Comparison of Different Osteobiologics in Terms of Imaging Modalities and Time Frames for Fusion Assessment in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术中不同骨生物材料在融合评估的影像学方式及时间框架方面的比较:一项系统评价
Global Spine J. 2024 Feb;14(2_suppl):141S-162S. doi: 10.1177/21925682231157312.
3
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a tantalum cage: lumbar lordosis redistribution and sacral slope restoration with a modified posterior technique.
经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术联合钽网:改良后路技术对腰椎前凸度的再分配和骶骨倾斜度的恢复。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2023 Dec 13;24(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s10195-023-00741-3.
4
Advancements in Additive Manufacturing of Tantalum via the Laser Powder Bed Fusion (PBF-LB/M): A Comprehensive Review.通过激光粉末床熔融(PBF-LB/M)进行钽的增材制造进展:全面综述
Materials (Basel). 2023 Sep 27;16(19):6419. doi: 10.3390/ma16196419.
5
Tantalum as Trabecular Metal for Endosseous Implantable Applications.用于骨内植入应用的钽小梁金属
Biomimetics (Basel). 2023 Jan 23;8(1):49. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8010049.
6
The Clinical Application of Porous Tantalum and Its New Development for Bone Tissue Engineering.多孔钽的临床应用及其在骨组织工程中的新进展。
Materials (Basel). 2021 May 18;14(10):2647. doi: 10.3390/ma14102647.
7
Porous silicon carbide coated with tantalum as potential material for bone implants.涂有钽的多孔碳化硅作为骨植入物的潜在材料。
Regen Biomater. 2020 Jun 18;7(5):453-459. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbaa021. eCollection 2020 Oct.
8
The Role of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion on Relieving Axial Neck Pain in Patients With Single-Level Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.前路颈椎间盘切除融合术对单节段疾病患者缓解颈部轴向疼痛的作用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Global Spine J. 2020 May;10(3):312-323. doi: 10.1177/2192568219837923. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
9
Tantalum: the next biomaterial in spine surgery?钽:脊柱手术中的下一种生物材料?
J Spine Surg. 2020 Mar;6(1):72-86. doi: 10.21037/jss.2020.01.01.
10
Porous silicon nitride spacers versus PEEK cages for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical and radiological results of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.多孔氮化硅间隔器与聚醚醚酮椎间融合器用于颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术:单盲随机对照试验的临床和影像学结果
Eur Spine J. 2017 Sep;26(9):2372-2379. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5079-6. Epub 2017 Apr 5.