• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

协调风险管理与恢复性司法的经验:支持与问责圈在风险社会中如何以恢复性方式发挥作用。

Experiences in reconciling risk management and restorative justice: how circles of support and accountability work restoratively in the risk society.

作者信息

Hannem Stacey

机构信息

Wilfrid Laurier University, Brantford Campus, Brantford, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2013 Mar;57(3):269-88. doi: 10.1177/0306624X11432538. Epub 2011 Dec 26.

DOI:10.1177/0306624X11432538
PMID:22200602
Abstract

Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA) is a restorative justice-based model that originated in Canada in the mid-1990s for the postincarceration reintegration of those who have offended sexually. Although the roots of COSA are in restorative justice philosophy, the program has also found favour, to some degree, with organisations such as police services and corrections that are traditionally concerned more with protecting community safety than with the ideals of restorative justice. Informed by the author's research and personal experience as a COSA volunteer, and analysis of recent and historical representations of COSA, this article explores theoretically how the development of the COSA initiative has been influenced by the seemingly disparate concerns of both the restorative justice and community protection movements, and examines the importance of balancing these paradigms in the everyday practices of circles.

摘要

支持与问责圈(COSA)是一种基于恢复性司法的模式,于20世纪90年代中期起源于加拿大,用于性犯罪者出狱后的重新融入社会。尽管COSA起源于恢复性司法理念,但该项目在一定程度上也受到了警方和惩教机构等组织的青睐,这些组织传统上更关注保护社区安全,而非恢复性司法的理想。基于作者作为COSA志愿者的研究和个人经历,以及对COSA近期和历史表现的分析,本文从理论上探讨了COSA倡议的发展如何受到恢复性司法和社区保护运动这两个看似不同的关注点的影响,并审视了在圈子的日常实践中平衡这些范式的重要性。

相似文献

1
Experiences in reconciling risk management and restorative justice: how circles of support and accountability work restoratively in the risk society.协调风险管理与恢复性司法的经验:支持与问责圈在风险社会中如何以恢复性方式发挥作用。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2013 Mar;57(3):269-88. doi: 10.1177/0306624X11432538. Epub 2011 Dec 26.
2
Circles of support and accountability (CoSA): a review of the development of CoSA and its international implementation.支持和问责制圈 (CoSA):CoSA 的发展及其国际实施情况综述。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;31(2):195-205. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2018.1552406. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
3
Analysing penal innovation.分析刑事创新。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2013 Mar;57(3):267-8. doi: 10.1177/0306624X13478039.
4
Managing unacceptable risk: sex offenders, community response, and social policy in the United States and Canada.管理不可接受的风险:美国和加拿大的性犯罪者、社区反应与社会政策
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2002 Aug;46(4):483-511. doi: 10.1177/0306624X02464009.
5
"I Am a Different Man Now"-Sex Offenders in Circles of Support and Accountability: A Prospective Study.“我已焕然一新”——性犯罪者在支持与问责圈子中的情况:一项前瞻性研究
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2017 May;61(7):751-772. doi: 10.1177/0306624X15612431. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
6
Looking inside a circle: volunteer experiences of circles of support and accountability.审视圈子内部:支持与问责圈子的志愿者经历
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2018 Oct 29;26(1):129-149. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1485521. eCollection 2019.
7
Circles of Support & Accountability: a Canadian national replication of outcome findings.支持和问责制圈:加拿大全国复制的结果发现。
Sex Abuse. 2009 Dec;21(4):412-30. doi: 10.1177/1079063209347724.
8
Can Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA) work in the United States? Preliminary results from a randomized experiment in Minnesota.支持和问责制圈(COSA)在美国可行吗?明尼苏达州随机试验的初步结果。
Sex Abuse. 2013 Apr;25(2):143-65. doi: 10.1177/1079063212453942. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
9
Evaluating Restorative Justice Circles of Support and Accountability: Can Social Support Overcome Structural Barriers?评估恢复性司法支持与问责圈:社会支持能否克服结构性障碍?
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 Feb;62(3):739-758. doi: 10.1177/0306624X16652627. Epub 2016 Jun 5.
10
A U.K. cost-benefit analysis of circles of support and accountability interventions.英国支持和问责制干预措施的成本效益分析。
Sex Abuse. 2013 Jun;25(3):211-29. doi: 10.1177/1079063212443385. Epub 2012 May 7.