• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持和问责制圈(COSA)在美国可行吗?明尼苏达州随机试验的初步结果。

Can Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA) work in the United States? Preliminary results from a randomized experiment in Minnesota.

机构信息

Minnesota Department of Corrections, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.

出版信息

Sex Abuse. 2013 Apr;25(2):143-65. doi: 10.1177/1079063212453942. Epub 2012 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1177/1079063212453942
PMID:22855005
Abstract

In 2008, the Minnesota Department of Corrections implemented Minnesota Circles of Support and Accountability (MnCOSA), a sex offender reentry program based on the Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA) model developed in Canada during the 1990s. Using a randomized experimental design, this study evaluates the effectiveness of MnCOSA by conducting a cost-benefit analysis and comparing recidivism outcomes in the MnCOSA (N = 31) and control groups (N = 31). Despite the small total sample size (N = 62), the results from Cox regression models suggest that MnCOSA significantly reduced three of the five recidivism measures examined. By the end of 2011, none of the MnCOSA offenders had been rearrested for a new sex offense compared with one offender in the control group. Because of less recidivism observed among MnCOSA participants, the results from the cost-benefit analysis show the program has produced an estimated US$363,211 in costs avoided to the state, resulting in a benefit of US$11,716 per participant. For every dollar spent on MnCOSA, the program has generated an estimated benefit of US$1.82 (an 82% return on investment).

摘要

2008 年,明尼苏达州惩教署实施了明尼苏达州支持和问责制圈(MnCOSA),这是一个基于 20 世纪 90 年代在加拿大开发的支持和问责制圈(COSA)模式的性犯罪者再融入计划。本研究采用随机实验设计,通过进行成本效益分析,并比较 MnCOSA(N=31)和对照组(N=31)的累犯结果,评估 MnCOSA 的有效性。尽管总样本量较小(N=62),但 Cox 回归模型的结果表明,MnCOSA 显著降低了五个累犯指标中的三个。到 2011 年底,MnCOSA 罪犯中没有一人因新的性犯罪被捕,而对照组中有一名罪犯。由于 MnCOSA 参与者的累犯率较低,成本效益分析的结果表明,该计划为该州避免了约 363211 美元的成本,每个参与者的收益为 11716 美元。每花费 1 美元在 MnCOSA 上,该计划估计产生 1.82 美元的收益(投资回报率为 82%)。

相似文献

1
Can Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA) work in the United States? Preliminary results from a randomized experiment in Minnesota.支持和问责制圈(COSA)在美国可行吗?明尼苏达州随机试验的初步结果。
Sex Abuse. 2013 Apr;25(2):143-65. doi: 10.1177/1079063212453942. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
2
Desires and Desirability of Volunteers in CoSA Programs.合作戒毒治疗计划中志愿者的意愿和期望。
Sex Abuse. 2021 Jun;33(4):406-433. doi: 10.1177/1079063220912454. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
3
Circles of support and accountability (CoSA): a review of the development of CoSA and its international implementation.支持和问责制圈 (CoSA):CoSA 的发展及其国际实施情况综述。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;31(2):195-205. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2018.1552406. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
4
A U.K. cost-benefit analysis of circles of support and accountability interventions.英国支持和问责制干预措施的成本效益分析。
Sex Abuse. 2013 Jun;25(3):211-29. doi: 10.1177/1079063212443385. Epub 2012 May 7.
5
Circles of Support & Accountability: a Canadian national replication of outcome findings.支持和问责制圈:加拿大全国复制的结果发现。
Sex Abuse. 2009 Dec;21(4):412-30. doi: 10.1177/1079063209347724.
6
Contextualizing the Policy and Pragmatics of Reintegrating Sex Offenders.将性犯罪者重新融入社会的政策与务实做法的背景分析
Sex Abuse. 2017 Feb;29(1):28-50. doi: 10.1177/1079063215574711. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
7
Circles of Support and Accountability for Sex Offenders: A Systematic Review of Outcomes.性犯罪者支持与问责圈:结果的系统评价
Sex Abuse. 2017 Aug;29(5):446-478. doi: 10.1177/1079063215603691. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
8
Evaluating Restorative Justice Circles of Support and Accountability: Can Social Support Overcome Structural Barriers?评估恢复性司法支持与问责圈:社会支持能否克服结构性障碍?
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 Feb;62(3):739-758. doi: 10.1177/0306624X16652627. Epub 2016 Jun 5.
9
Learning from research: Adapting interventions for sexual offending to improve outcomes.从研究中学习:调整针对性犯罪的干预措施以改善结果。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2019 Aug;29(4):227-238. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2122. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
10
Can faith-based correctional programs work? An outcome evaluation of the innerchange freedom initiative in Minnesota.基于宗教信仰的惩教项目能起作用吗?明尼苏达州“内心转变自由倡议”的成果评估。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2013 Jul;57(7):813-41. doi: 10.1177/0306624X12439397. Epub 2012 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of Individual and Interpersonal Adjustment Among Non-offending Partners of Individuals With Histories of Sexual Offenses.有性犯罪史者的非犯罪伴侣中个人及人际适应的预测因素
Sex Abuse. 2025 Feb;37(1):58-87. doi: 10.1177/10790632231213832. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
2
The effectiveness of an additive informal social network intervention for forensic psychiatric outpatients: results of a randomized controlled trial.一种针对法医精神病门诊患者的附加非正式社交网络干预措施的有效性:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 24;14:1129492. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1129492. eCollection 2023.
3
"Obviously It's for the Victim to Decide": Restorative Justice for Sexual and Family Violence From the Perspective of Second-Wave Anti-Rape Activists.
“显然应由受害者决定”:从第二次反强奸运动积极分子的视角看性暴力和家庭暴力的恢复性司法。
Violence Against Women. 2024 Oct;30(12-13):3187-3210. doi: 10.1177/10778012231174353. Epub 2023 May 11.
4
Patients' and volunteer coaches' experiences with an informal social network intervention in forensic psychiatric care: a qualitative analysis.患者和志愿者教练在法医精神病学护理中非正式社交网络干预的体验:定性分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 26;23(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04594-2.
5
The Effect of Attitudes Towards Individuals with Sexual Convictions on Professional and Student Risk Judgments.对性罪犯的态度对专业人员和学生风险判断的影响。
Sex Abuse. 2022 Dec;34(8):948-972. doi: 10.1177/10790632211070799. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
6
Looking inside a circle: volunteer experiences of circles of support and accountability.审视圈子内部:支持与问责圈子的志愿者经历
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2018 Oct 29;26(1):129-149. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1485521. eCollection 2019.
7
Psychological treatment of sex offenders.性犯罪者的心理治疗。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2013 Mar;15(3):348. doi: 10.1007/s11920-012-0348-x.