Suppr超能文献

美托咪定-阿法沙龙和美托咪定-氯胺酮在半放养的贝内特小袋鼠(赤褐袋鼠)中的评估

Evaluation of medetomidine-alfaxalone and medetomidine-ketamine in semi-free ranging Bennett's wallabies (Macropus rufogriseus).

作者信息

Bouts Tim, Karunaratna Dananjaya, Berry Karla, Dodds Joanne, Gasthuys Frank, Routh Andrew, Taylor Polly

机构信息

Zoological Society London, Whipsnade Zoo, Veterinary Department, Whipsnade, Bedfordshire LU6 2LF, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Zoo Wildl Med. 2011 Dec;42(4):617-22. doi: 10.1638/2010-0246.1.

Abstract

Twenty-six adult semi-free-ranging Bennett's wallabies were anesthetized. Animals in group MA received medetomidine 0.1 mg/kg and alfaxalone 4 mg/kg i.m. in a 5-ml dart, whereas those in group MK received medetomidine 0.1 mg/kg and ketamine 5 mg/kg i.m. in a 3-ml dart. Dosages were based on estimated body weights. The wallabies were allowed to recover spontaneously or, if still nonresponsive at the end of the procedure, were given atipamezole 0.5 mg/kg (half the dose via i.m. and the other half via i.v.). Heart rate and respiratory rate were monitored at 5-min intervals, temperature at 10-min intervals, and two arterial blood samples were taken for blood gas analysis. Statistical analysis was performed by using analysis of variance (P < 0.05). The use of 5-ml darts in group MA compared with 3-ml darts in group MK could potentially increase the risk of iatrogenic trauma and should be considered. Induction and maintenance of anesthesia were satisfactory in both groups. There were no significant differences between the groups in mean time to first effect, recumbency, and approach, or to time to sternal recumbency and standing after reversal with atipamezole. Although bradycardia was present in both groups, no statistical differences were calculated for respiratory rate and heart rate, whereas the mean cloacal temperature was significantly lower in group MA (P = 0.01). Mixed acid-base disturbances occurred in both groups. All but one animal in group MK needed atipamezole at the end of the procedure. No adverse effects were observed after recovery.

摘要

26只成年半散养的贝内特小袋鼠被麻醉。MA组动物在一支5毫升的 dart 中接受0.1毫克/千克的美托咪定和4毫克/千克的阿法沙龙肌肉注射,而MK组动物在一支3毫升的 dart 中接受0.1毫克/千克的美托咪定和5毫克/千克的氯胺酮肌肉注射。剂量基于估计体重。小袋鼠被允许自行恢复,或者如果在手术结束时仍无反应,则给予0.5毫克/千克的阿替美唑(一半剂量通过肌肉注射,另一半通过静脉注射)。心率和呼吸频率每隔5分钟监测一次,体温每隔10分钟监测一次,并采集两份动脉血样本进行血气分析。采用方差分析进行统计分析(P < 0.05)。与MK组使用3毫升的 dart 相比,MA组使用5毫升的 dart 可能会增加医源性创伤的风险,应予以考虑。两组的麻醉诱导和维持效果均令人满意。两组在首次起效、卧倒和接近的平均时间,或在使用阿替美唑逆转后达到胸骨卧倒和站立的时间方面没有显著差异。虽然两组均出现心动过缓,但呼吸频率和心率未计算出统计学差异,而MA组的平均泄殖腔温度显著较低(P = 0.01)。两组均出现混合性酸碱紊乱。MK组除一只动物外,所有动物在手术结束时都需要阿替美唑。恢复后未观察到不良反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验