Kobolak Julianna, Horsch Marion, Geissler Sandra, Mamo Solomon, Beckers Johannes, Dinnyes Andras
Genetic Reprogramming Group, Agricultural Biotechnology Center, Gödöllő, Hungary.
Cell Reprogram. 2012 Feb;14(1):68-78. doi: 10.1089/cell.2011.0057. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
In a mouse model nuclear transfer embryo-derived embryonic stem cell lines (ntESCs) of various genetic backgrounds and donor cell types were compared with reference ESCs and analyzed comprehensively at molecular level as a second part of a larger study. Expression profiles of ntESCs established by different NT-methods (piezoelectric microinjection or zona-free) were indistinguishable. However, expression profiling analyses identified differentially regulated genes between reference ESCs and ntESCs from different genetic backgrounds. A number of pluripotency and stemness marker genes significantly differed at the mRNA level between the cell lines. However, cluster and lineage analyses revealed that such differences had no effect on cell differentiation and cell fate. Regardless of the donor cell type, gene expression profiles of ntESCs were more similar to each other than to their counterpart fertilized embryo-derived ESCs of the same genotype. Overall, the results indicated that expression profile differences may be related to the genotype rather than to technical variations.
在一个小鼠模型中,作为一项更大规模研究的第二部分,对各种遗传背景和供体细胞类型的核移植胚胎来源的胚胎干细胞系(ntESCs)与对照胚胎干细胞进行了比较,并在分子水平上进行了全面分析。通过不同核移植方法(压电显微注射或无透明带法)建立的ntESCs的表达谱没有差异。然而,表达谱分析确定了对照胚胎干细胞与来自不同遗传背景的ntESCs之间存在差异调节基因。许多多能性和干性标记基因在细胞系之间的mRNA水平上有显著差异。然而,聚类和谱系分析表明,这些差异对细胞分化和细胞命运没有影响。无论供体细胞类型如何,ntESCs的基因表达谱彼此之间比与其相同基因型的对应的受精胚胎来源的胚胎干细胞更相似。总体而言,结果表明表达谱差异可能与基因型有关,而不是与技术差异有关。