Wiecek E M, McCartney N, McKelvie R S
Department of Physical Education, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Cardiol. 1990 Nov 1;66(15):1065-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90506-v.
Based on auscultation measurements after exercise, circuit weight training in cardiac patients has been reported to provoke minimal increases in systolic pressure. Direct (brachial artery catheter) and indirect (sphygmomanometry) measures of blood pressure were compared at rest, during lifting with the legs (approximately the fourth, ninth and fourteenth repetition) and during 2 minutes of recovery after lifting with the arms and legs. Subjects performed 15 repetitions of single-arm curl, single-arm military press and single- and double-leg press exercises at 40 and 60% of the maximum load that could be lifted once on a multistation weightlifting apparatus. Indirect measures of systolic pressure at rest were 13% less than those recorded directly (130 +/- 7 vs 149 +/- 8 torr; p less than 0.01); diastolic pressures were similar using either method. This pattern was maintained during lifting with the legs at both intensities, and after exercise with both the legs and the arms. The mean systolic pressure recorded indirectly immediately after exercise was 63 torr (31%) and 76 torr (34%) less than the average peak intraarterial value recorded during leg and arm exercises, respectively. The highest intraarterial pressures were generated during the final repetitions of the set; immediately after the last repetition, both systolic and diastolic pressures rapidly decreased. It is concluded that indirect estimates of systolic pressure are significantly less than true arterial values at rest, and during and after lifting. Moreover, indirect measurements after lifting do not allow accurate conclusions to be drawn about the arterial pressures generated during lifting because of the rapid decrease in pressure that occurs after exercise.
根据运动后的听诊测量结果,据报道,心脏病患者进行循环重量训练时收缩压的升高幅度极小。在静息状态、腿部举重时(大约第4次、第9次和第14次重复动作)以及手臂和腿部举重后恢复2分钟期间,对直接(肱动脉导管)和间接(血压计)血压测量方法进行了比较。受试者在多站式举重器械上以一次能举起的最大负荷的40%和60%进行15次单臂弯举、单臂推举以及单腿和双腿推举练习。静息时收缩压的间接测量值比直接测量值低13%(130±7与149±8托;p<0.01);两种方法测得的舒张压相似。在两种强度的腿部举重过程中以及腿部和手臂运动后,这种模式均保持不变。运动后立即间接记录的平均收缩压分别比腿部和手臂运动期间记录的平均动脉内峰值低63托(31%)和76托(34%)。在一组动作的最后几次重复中产生了最高的动脉内压力;在最后一次重复动作后,收缩压和舒张压均迅速下降。得出的结论是,静息时以及举重期间和之后,收缩压的间接估计值显著低于真实动脉值。此外,由于运动后压力迅速下降,举重后进行的间接测量无法得出关于举重期间产生的动脉压力的准确结论。