• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发和验证男男性行为者的 HIV 相关对偶措施。

Development and validation of HIV-related dyadic measures for men who have sex with men.

机构信息

Institute of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30302–3995, USA.

出版信息

J Sex Res. 2013;50(2):164-77. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2011.636845. Epub 2011 Dec 29.

DOI:10.1080/00224499.2011.636845
PMID:22206480
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7579722/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop and assess the psychometric properties of several scales that measure dyadic constructs derived from an integrated model of interdependence theory and communal coping perspectives. The scales are specific to HIV risk and men who have sex with men who are in an intimate relationship. These scales are newly developed measures of perceived severity of HIV, preferences for sexual health outcomes, outcome and couple efficacy to avoid HIV, and communal coping strategies. Scale items were created based on theoretical definitions and results from six focus groups with men who have sex with men. Face and content validity of the scales were assessed with a panel of six experts in the field of HIV prevention. Revised scales were subsequently administered to an online sample of 638 men who have sex with men, who indicated being in a relationship for at least three months. All scales showed adequate reliability, and evidence for construct validity was obtained for all scales, except for perceived severity of HIV. The results indicate that these dyadic scales are psychometrically sound and can be used in future HIV prevention research and practice with men who have sex with men couples.

摘要

本研究旨在开发和评估几个衡量对等式构念的量表的心理计量学特性,这些构念源自相互依存理论和共同应对视角的综合模型。这些量表是针对艾滋病毒风险和处于亲密关系中的男男性行为者专门设计的。这些量表是新开发的衡量艾滋病毒严重程度、对性健康结果的偏好、避免艾滋病毒的结果和夫妇效力以及共同应对策略的方法。量表项目是根据理论定义和与男男性行为者进行的六组焦点小组的结果创建的。该量表的表面效度和内容效度由六位艾滋病预防领域的专家进行评估。随后,对 638 名表示至少有三个月恋爱关系的男男性行为者进行了在线调查,对修订后的量表进行了评估。所有量表的信度都足够,除了对艾滋病毒严重程度的感知外,所有量表都获得了结构有效性的证据。结果表明,这些对等式量表具有良好的心理计量学特性,可用于未来针对男男性行为者伴侣的艾滋病毒预防研究和实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c6a/7579722/d34fb06ea89e/nihms-413334-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c6a/7579722/d34fb06ea89e/nihms-413334-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c6a/7579722/d34fb06ea89e/nihms-413334-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of HIV-related dyadic measures for men who have sex with men.开发和验证男男性行为者的 HIV 相关对偶措施。
J Sex Res. 2013;50(2):164-77. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2011.636845. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
2
Psychometric properties of the European Portuguese version of the Perceived Risk of HIV Scale in the general population and HIV-uninfected partners from sero-different couples.欧洲葡萄牙语版感知 HIV 风险量表在普通人群和来自血清不同伴侣的 HIV 未感染者中的心理测量特性。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):1336. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7696-y.
3
The Development and Validation of the Sexual and Relationship Distress Scale.性与关系困扰量表的编制与验证。
J Sex Med. 2018 Aug;15(8):1167-1179. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
4
Validation of the Maternal and Partner Sex During Pregnancy Scales (MSP/PSP) in Portugal: Assessing Dyadic Interdependence and Associations with Sexual Behaviors.验证葡萄牙版孕期伴侣性别问卷(MSP/PSP):评估对偶相互依存关系及与性行为的关联。
J Sex Med. 2021 Apr;18(4):789-799. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.01.184. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
5
Development and Validation of the Sexual Contingent Self-Worth Scale.性条件自我价值量表的编制与验证
J Sex Res. 2017 Jan;54(1):117-129. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1186587. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
6
Gender Non-affirmation from Cisgender Male Partners: Development and Validation of a Brief Stigma Scale for HIV Research with Transgender Men Who Have Sex with Men (Trans MSM).顺性别男性伴侣的性别否定:用于男男性行为的跨性别男性艾滋病毒研究的简短污名量表的制定和验证(Trans MSM)。
AIDS Behav. 2020 Jan;24(1):331-343. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02749-5.
7
Correlates of Successful Enrollment of Same-Sex Male Couples Into a Web-Based HIV Prevention Research Study: Cross-Sectional Study.基于网络的 HIV 预防研究中成功招募同性男性伴侣的相关因素:横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Jan 9;6(1):e15078. doi: 10.2196/15078.
8
Communal or Autonomous? Coping Experiences of Chinese Serodiscordant Male Couples to HIV Care: A Dyadic Qualitative Analysis.集体应对还是自主应对?中国血清学不一致男性伴侣应对艾滋病护理的经历:一项二元定性分析。
Arch Sex Behav. 2023 Nov;52(8):3553-3564. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02643-1. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
9
Evaluation of the validity of the condom use self-efficacy scale (CUSES) in young men using two behavioral simulations.使用两种行为模拟方法评估年轻男性避孕套使用自我效能量表(CUSES)的有效性。
Health Psychol. 1997 Mar;16(2):175-8. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.16.2.175.
10
Dyadic dynamics of HIV risk among transgender women and their primary male sexual partners: the role of sexual agreement types and motivations.跨性别女性及其主要男性性伴侣之间HIV风险的二元动态关系:性协议类型和动机的作用。
AIDS Care. 2016;28(1):104-11. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2015.1069788. Epub 2015 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Interdependence and Sexual Health: Relationship factors associated with sexual behavior among sexual minority males in non-monogamous relationships who use drugs.相互依存与性健康:在非一夫一妻制关系中吸毒的性少数男性中性行为的相关关系因素。
J Sex Res. 2025 Jul 22:1-14. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2025.2529014.
2
Tailoring a Skills-Based Serostatus Disclosure Intervention for Transgender Women in South Africa: Protocol for a Usability and Feasibility Study.为南非跨性别女性量身定制基于技能的血清学状态披露干预措施:一项可用性和可行性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Mar 26;14:e52121. doi: 10.2196/52121.
3
Assessing a Couples-Based, Digital HIV Serostatus-Neutral Intervention (Para Ti, Para Mí, Para Nosotros) for Adult Cisgender Sexual Minority Male Couples in Lima, Peru: Protocol for a 6-Month Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.评估秘鲁利马针对成年顺性别性少数男性伴侣的基于伴侣的、数字化 HIV 血清中性干预措施(Para Ti, Para Mí, Para Nosotros):一项 6 个月的试点随机对照试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Oct 10;13:e63106. doi: 10.2196/63106.
4
Optimizing Individual HIV Testing and Counseling for Emerging Adult Sexual Minority Men (Aged 18 to 24) in Relationships: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Adjunct Communication Components.优化针对处于伴侣关系中的新兴成年男同性恋者(18 至 24 岁)的个体 HIV 检测和咨询:辅助沟通要素的一项试点随机对照试验
AIDS Behav. 2024 Aug;28(8):2730-2745. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04371-6. Epub 2024 May 27.
5
TikToks Lead to Higher Knowledge and Perceived Severity of Sexual Violence among Adolescent Men.抖音短视频导致青少年男性对性暴力有更高的认知及感知严重性。
J Youth Adolesc. 2023 Dec;52(12):2449-2463. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01867-7. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
6
A Relationship-Focused HIV Prevention Intervention for Young Sexual Minority Men in the United States: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of the We Prevent Intervention.美国性少数青年男性的以关系为中心的艾滋病毒预防干预:我们预防干预的一项试点随机对照试验。
AIDS Behav. 2023 Aug;27(8):2703-2719. doi: 10.1007/s10461-023-03994-5. Epub 2023 Feb 12.
7
Dimensions of Sexual Health Conversations among U.S. Black Heterosexual Couples.美国黑人性取向异性恋伴侣的性健康对话维度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 29;20(1):588. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010588.
8
Clinically significant depressive symptoms among a diverse sample of same-sex male couples in Atlanta, Boston, and Chicago: An analysis of individual- and dyadic-level factors.亚特兰大、波士顿和芝加哥不同样本的同性男性伴侣中具有临床意义的抑郁症状:个体和二元层面因素分析。
J Gay Lesbian Ment Health. 2018;22(4):327-347. doi: 10.1080/19359705.2018.1476278. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
9
Do Couple-Based Interventions Show Larger Effects in Promoting HIV Preventive Behaviors than Individualized Interventions in Couples? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 11 Randomized Controlled Trials.基于伴侣的干预措施在促进艾滋病预防行为方面比个体化干预措施对伴侣的效果更大吗?11 项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
AIDS Behav. 2023 Jan;27(1):314-334. doi: 10.1007/s10461-022-03768-5. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
10
Couple Efficacy and Communal Coping for HIV Prevention Among Kenyan Pregnant Couples.肯尼亚孕妇夫妇中的夫妻效能和社区应对对 HIV 预防的作用。
AIDS Behav. 2022 Jul;26(7):2135-2147. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03559-4. Epub 2022 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationship factors associated with HIV risk among a sample of gay male couples.与男同性恋伴侣 HIV 风险相关的关系因素。
AIDS Behav. 2012 Feb;16(2):404-11. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-9976-0.
2
A framework for incorporating dyads in models of HIV-prevention.将对偶纳入 HIV 预防模型的框架。
AIDS Behav. 2010 Dec;14(Suppl 2):189-203. doi: 10.1007/s10461-010-9802-0.
3
Behavioral couple therapy for gay and lesbian couples with alcohol use disorders.同性恋伴侣的酒精使用障碍的行为夫妻治疗。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009 Dec;37(4):379-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2009.05.001. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
4
Reemergence of the HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men in North America, Western Europe, and Australia, 1996-2005.1996 - 2005年,北美、西欧和澳大利亚男男性行为者中HIV疫情再度出现。
Ann Epidemiol. 2009 Jun;19(6):423-31. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.03.004.
5
Estimating the proportion of HIV transmissions from main sex partners among men who have sex with men in five US cities.估算美国五个城市中男男性行为者主要性伴侣之间艾滋病毒传播的比例。
AIDS. 2009 Jun 1;23(9):1153-62. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32832baa34.
6
Development and validation of the sexual agreement investment scale.性协议投资量表的编制与验证。
J Sex Res. 2010 Jan;47(1):24-37. doi: 10.1080/00224490902916017.
7
Sexual desire, communication, satisfaction, and preferences of men and women in same-sex versus mixed-sex relationships.同性与异性关系中男性和女性的性欲、沟通、满意度及偏好。
J Sex Res. 2009 Jan-Feb;46(1):57-66. doi: 10.1080/00224490802645294.
8
Estimation of HIV incidence in the United States.美国艾滋病毒感染率的估计。
JAMA. 2008 Aug 6;300(5):520-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.5.520.
9
New heterosexually transmitted HIV infections in married or cohabiting couples in urban Zambia and Rwanda: an analysis of survey and clinical data.赞比亚和卢旺达城市地区已婚或同居伴侣中新发异性传播艾滋病毒感染情况:调查与临床数据分析
Lancet. 2008 Jun 28;371(9631):2183-91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60953-8.
10
Responsibility as a dimension of HIV prevention normative beliefs: measurement in three drug-using samples.
AIDS Care. 2007 Mar;19(3):403-9. doi: 10.1080/09540120600813780.