• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国黑人性取向异性恋伴侣的性健康对话维度。

Dimensions of Sexual Health Conversations among U.S. Black Heterosexual Couples.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.

School of Social Work, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14215, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 29;20(1):588. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010588.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20010588
PMID:36612908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9819242/
Abstract

Sexual health communication is an important feature of healthy intimate relationships; however, some couples may avoid discussing difficult matters (e.g., HIV/STI testing, sexual satisfaction) to minimize interpersonal conflict. From October 2018 to May 2019 in New York State, we conducted a multi-method descriptive pilot study to characterize Black heterosexual couples' (N = 28) sexual health conversations. Partners individually completed an online sexual health/relationship survey before engaging in-person for a joint dyadic qualitative in-depth interview. Quantitative descriptive statistics demonstrated that most absolute score differences among couple's preferences for sexual health outcomes, communal coping and sexual relationship power were mainly small, but greatest regarding extra-dyadic sexual behaviors. A qualitative descriptive approach discerned, motivation and norms for sexual health conversations, and communication patterns. Thematic and content analysis revealed two central themes: , and . Integrated findings indicate that couples possess varied communication patterns that operate with motivations for sexual health conversations toward subsequent sexual health promotion. Equitable and skewed communication patterns emerged as relationship assets that can be leveraged to optimize sexual health. There is also opportunity for future work to address communication regarding extra-dyadic behavior and preferences. Asset-based considerations are discussed.

摘要

性健康沟通是健康亲密关系的一个重要特征;然而,有些夫妇可能会避免讨论困难的问题(例如,艾滋病毒/性传播感染检测、性满意度),以尽量减少人际冲突。2018 年 10 月至 2019 年 5 月,我们在纽约州进行了一项多方法描述性试点研究,以描述黑人异性恋夫妇(N=28)的性健康对话。伴侣们在进行面对面的联合二元定性深入访谈之前,分别完成了一份在线性健康/关系调查。定量描述性统计数据表明,夫妻双方对性健康结果、共通应对和性关系权力的偏好的绝对分数差异主要较小,但在额外性行为方面最大。定性描述方法辨别出,性健康对话的动机和规范,以及沟通模式。主题和内容分析揭示了两个中心主题: ,和 。综合研究结果表明,夫妇之间存在不同的沟通模式,这些模式的动机是为了进行性健康对话,以促进随后的性健康。平等和倾斜的沟通模式是关系资产,可以加以利用,以优化性健康。也有机会开展未来的工作,解决关于额外性行为和偏好的沟通问题。讨论了基于资产的考虑因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c97b/9819242/cb204c1fcf83/ijerph-20-00588-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c97b/9819242/cb204c1fcf83/ijerph-20-00588-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c97b/9819242/cb204c1fcf83/ijerph-20-00588-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Dimensions of Sexual Health Conversations among U.S. Black Heterosexual Couples.美国黑人性取向异性恋伴侣的性健康对话维度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 29;20(1):588. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010588.
2
Perspectives on a Couples-Based, e-Health HIV Prevention Toolkit Intervention: A Qualitative Dyadic Study with Black, Heterosexual Couples in New York State.基于伴侣的电子健康艾滋病预防工具包干预的观点:纽约州黑人异性恋夫妇的定性对偶研究
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Jul;51(5):2625-2640. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02270-8. Epub 2022 May 31.
3
Sexual communication self-efficacy, hegemonic masculine norms and condom use among heterosexual couples in South Africa.南非异性恋伴侣之间的性沟通自我效能、霸权男性规范与避孕套使用情况
AIDS Care. 2016;28(2):228-33. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2015.1080792. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
4
Understanding how young cisgender heterosexual men navigate sexual health conversations and practices during casual sex: a qualitative study.理解年轻顺性别异性恋男性在随意性行为期间如何进行性健康对话和实践:一项定性研究。
Sex Health. 2023 Aug;20(4):347-356. doi: 10.1071/SH23012.
5
"Eyes that don't see, heart that doesn't feel": coping with sex work in intimate relationships and its implications for HIV/STI prevention.“看不见的眼睛,没有感觉的心”:在亲密关系中应对性工作及其对 HIV/性传播感染预防的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Jun;87:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
6
The mediating role of sexual and nonsexual communication between relationship and sexual satisfaction in a sample of college-age heterosexual couples.在一个年龄在大学阶段的异性恋伴侣样本中,关系和性满意度之间的性和非性沟通的中介作用。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2013;39(5):410-27. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2011.644652. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
7
Sexual and Relationship Satisfaction in Young, Heterosexual Couples: The Role of Sexual Frequency and Sexual Communication.年轻异性恋伴侣的性与关系满意度:性频率和性沟通的作用。
J Sex Med. 2020 Sep;17(9):1643-1652. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.06.013. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
8
Couple interdependence impacts HIV-related health behaviours among pregnant couples in southwestern Kenya: a qualitative analysis.夫妻相互依赖对肯尼亚西南部孕妇夫妇的艾滋病相关健康行为产生影响:一项定性分析。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2016 Nov 24;19(1):21224. doi: 10.7448/IAS.19.1.21224. eCollection 2016.
9
Illuminating the Context and Circumstances of Male Couples Establishing a Sexual Agreement in Their Relationship.揭示男性伴侣在其关系中达成性协议的背景和情况。
Am J Mens Health. 2017 May;11(3):600-609. doi: 10.1177/1557988316655528. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
10
Gendered constructions of the impact of HIV and AIDS in the context of the HIV-positive seroconcordant heterosexual relationship.在 HIV 阳性血清一致性异性关系背景下,艾滋病毒和艾滋病影响的性别建构。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2013 May 15;16(1):18021. doi: 10.7448/IAS.16.1.18021.

引用本文的文献

1
Couple-centered HIV prevention and care: Endorsement, practice and uncertainty among us healthcare providers in western-central upstate New York.以夫妻为中心的艾滋病毒预防与护理:纽约州中西部北部地区医疗服务提供者的认可、实践与不确定性
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 25;20(2):e0299185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299185. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
The Relational Wear and Tear of Everyday Racism Among African American Couples.非裔美国夫妻间日常种族主义的关系损耗。
Psychol Sci. 2022 Aug;33(8):1187-1198. doi: 10.1177/09567976221077041. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
2
Perspectives on a Couples-Based, e-Health HIV Prevention Toolkit Intervention: A Qualitative Dyadic Study with Black, Heterosexual Couples in New York State.基于伴侣的电子健康艾滋病预防工具包干预的观点:纽约州黑人异性恋夫妇的定性对偶研究
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Jul;51(5):2625-2640. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02270-8. Epub 2022 May 31.
3
Collaboration and Shared Decision-Making Between Patients and Clinicians in Preventive Health Care Decisions and US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations.
患者与临床医生在预防保健决策中的协作和共同决策,以及美国预防服务工作组的建议。
JAMA. 2022 Mar 22;327(12):1171-1176. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.3267.
4
Attitudes Toward and Willingness to Engage in Consensual Non-Monogamy (CNM) Among African Americans Who Have Never Engaged in CNM.从未有过同意性非单一伴侣关系经历的非裔美国人对其的态度和参与意愿。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Apr;51(3):1823-1831. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02268-2. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
5
Psychosocial risk factors of erectile dysfunction among heterosexual men living with HIV.HIV 感染者中异性恋男性勃起功能障碍的社会心理风险因素。
AIDS Care. 2023 Feb;35(2):253-260. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2022.2039357. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
6
Mental health and satisfaction with partners: a longitudinal analysis in the UK.心理健康和对伴侣的满意度:英国的纵向分析。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Jan 27;10(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00723-w.
7
Disclosure of HIV seropositivity to sexual partner in Ethiopia: A systematic review.埃塞俄比亚向性伴侣披露艾滋病毒血清阳性情况:一项系统综述。
Womens Health (Lond). 2021 Jan-Dec;17:17455065211063021. doi: 10.1177/17455065211063021.
8
A Systematic Review of Neighborhood-Level Influences on HIV Vulnerability.社区层面影响艾滋病易感性的系统评价
AIDS Behav. 2022 Mar;26(3):874-934. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03448-w. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
9
An Analysis of Sex Practices and Behaviors Among African Americans in Sexually Concurrent and Sexually Exclusive Relationships.《性伴随和性专一关系中非洲裔美国人性行为与行为分析》
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Oct;9(5):1923-1931. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01130-4. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
10
The Inconvenient Truth About Convenience and Purposive Samples.关于便利样本和有目的样本的尴尬真相。
Indian J Psychol Med. 2021 Jan;43(1):86-88. doi: 10.1177/0253717620977000. Epub 2020 Dec 17.