Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences and Semel Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1759, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012 Jun 1;123(1-3):249-54. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.11.019. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
We sought to test the hypothesis that methamphetamine use interferes with both the quantity and quality of one's education, such that the years of education obtained by methamphetamine dependent individuals serves to underestimate general cognitive functioning and overestimate the quality of academic learning.
Thirty-six methamphetamine-dependent participants and 42 healthy comparison subjects completed cognitive tests and self-report measures in Los Angeles, California. An overall cognitive battery score was used to assess general cognition, and vocabulary knowledge was used as a proxy for the quality of academic learning. Linear regression procedures were used for analyses.
Supporting the hypothesis that methamphetamine use interferes with the quantity of education, we found that (a) earlier onset of methamphetamine use was associated with fewer years of education (p<.01); (b) using a normative model developed in healthy participants, methamphetamine-dependent participants had lower educational attainment than predicted from their demographics and performance on the cognitive battery score (p<.01); and (c) greater differences between methamphetamine-dependent participants' predicted and actual educational attainment were associated with an earlier onset of MA use (p≤.01). Supporting the hypothesis that methamphetamine use interferes with the quality of education, years of education received prior to the onset of methamphetamine use was a better predictor of a proxy for academic learning, vocabulary knowledge, than was the total years of education obtained.
Results support the hypothesis that methamphetamine use interferes with the quantity and quality of educational exposure, leading to under- and overestimation of cognitive function and academic learning, respectively.
我们试图验证一个假设,即甲基苯丙胺的使用会干扰一个人受教育的数量和质量,以至于甲基苯丙胺依赖者所获得的受教育年限会低估其一般认知功能,并高估其学术学习质量。
在加利福尼亚州洛杉矶,36 名甲基苯丙胺依赖者和 42 名健康对照组参与者完成了认知测试和自我报告测量。使用总体认知电池评分来评估一般认知,使用词汇知识作为学术学习质量的替代指标。线性回归程序用于分析。
支持甲基苯丙胺的使用会干扰受教育数量的假设,我们发现:(a)甲基苯丙胺使用的早期发作与受教育年限较少有关(p<.01);(b)使用在健康参与者中开发的规范模型,甲基苯丙胺依赖者的受教育程度低于根据其人口统计学和认知电池评分表现预测的水平(p<.01);(c)甲基苯丙胺依赖者的预测和实际受教育程度之间的差异越大,与 MA 使用的早期发作有关(p≤.01)。支持甲基苯丙胺的使用会干扰教育质量的假设,在甲基苯丙胺使用发作之前接受的教育年限比获得的总受教育年限更能预测学术学习的替代指标,词汇知识。
结果支持这样一种假设,即甲基苯丙胺的使用会干扰受教育的数量和质量,从而分别导致对认知功能和学术学习的低估和高估。