Suppr超能文献

干燥综合征分类标准:批判性综述。

Classification criteria for Sjogren's syndrome: a critical review.

机构信息

Rheumatology Unit, University of Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

J Autoimmun. 2012 Aug;39(1-2):9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2011.12.006. Epub 2011 Dec 30.

Abstract

Over the years, several different criteria sets have been proposed for the classification of Sjögren's syndrome (SS), but none of them has been widely adopted by the scientific community until the publication of the 1993 Preliminary European Classification criteria. These Classification criteria have been largely employed both in clinical practice and in observational and interventional studies for many years. In 2002 the Preliminary European Criteria were re-examined by a joint American and European Committee. The result of this revision were the American and European Consensus Group classification criteria (AECG-criteria) which introduced more clearly defined rules for classifying patients with primary or secondary SS, and provided more precise exclusion criteria. These AECG-criteria set is now considered to be valid to ensure a specific diagnosis of SS by the vast majority of the expert in the field. To date, the AECG-criteria have been cited more than 1.304 in literature and have been used to estimate the point prevalence of the disease in several studies conducted in Greece, UK, Turkey and Norway. However, when employed in epidemiologic studies or in daily practice, the AECG-criteria have demonstrated a higher specificity (75%), but a lesser sensitivity (65.7%) in comparison to the previous Preliminary European criteria, indicating an average prevalence of pSS at ~ 0.2% in the adult population, which is far lower than previously reported. In this paper we will critically analyse the "pro and cons" of the current AECG-criteria and of the potential usefulness of some potential revisions.

摘要

多年来,已经提出了几种不同的分类标准来分类干燥综合征 (SS),但直到 1993 年初步欧洲分类标准发表,这些标准才被科学界广泛采用。这些分类标准在临床实践、观察性和干预性研究中已经使用了多年。2002 年,美国和欧洲联合委员会重新审查了初步欧洲标准。这次修订的结果是美国和欧洲共识组分类标准(AECG 标准),该标准为原发性或继发性 SS 患者的分类引入了更明确的规则,并提供了更精确的排除标准。这些 AECG 标准现在被认为是有效的,可以确保绝大多数领域的专家能够做出特定的 SS 诊断。迄今为止,这些 AECG 标准在文献中被引用了 1304 多次,并被用于估计在希腊、英国、土耳其和挪威进行的几项研究中的疾病时点患病率。然而,当在流行病学研究或日常实践中使用时,与以前的初步欧洲标准相比,AECG 标准具有更高的特异性 (75%),但敏感性较低 (65.7%),表明成人中 pSS 的平均患病率约为 0.2%,远低于之前的报告。在本文中,我们将批判性地分析当前 AECG 标准的“优缺点”以及一些潜在修订的潜在用途。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验