• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The feasibility and acceptability of using a portfolio to assess professional competence.使用档案袋评估专业能力的可行性和可接受性。
Physiother Can. 2011 Winter;63(1):78-85. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2009.43. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
2
Qualitative study of the impact of an authentic electronic portfolio in undergraduate medical education.本科医学教育中真实电子档案袋影响的定性研究
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Dec 17;14:265. doi: 10.1186/s12909-014-0265-2.
3
Students' attitudes towards the introduction of a Personal and Professional Development portfolio: potential barriers and facilitators.学生对引入个人与专业发展档案的态度:潜在的障碍和促进因素。
BMC Med Educ. 2009 Dec 1;9:69. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-9-69.
4
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
5
The effectiveness of portfolios for post-graduate assessment and education: BEME Guide No 12.研究生评估与教育组合的有效性:BEME指南第12号
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):299-318. doi: 10.1080/01421590902883056.
6
Preparing student midwives for professional practice: Evaluation of a student e-portfolio assessment item.为学生助产士做好专业实践准备:学生电子档案评估项目的评估。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2018 Sep;32:84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.07.008. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
7
[Portfolios: a tool for the training and assessment of residents in dermatology, part 1].[病例组合:皮肤科住院医师培训与评估工具,第1部分]
Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2011 May;102(4):244-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2010.11.003. Epub 2011 Feb 8.
8
How is self-regulated learning documented in e-portfolios of trainees? A content analysis.学习者电子档案中的自我调节学习是如何记录的?一项内容分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jun 26;20(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02114-4.
9
Students' perceptions on the use of portfolios in pre-registration nursing education: a questionnaire survey.学生对注册前护理教育中使用档案袋的看法:一项问卷调查
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Mar;43(3):333-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.05.005. Epub 2005 Jul 21.
10
Making portfolios work in practice.让投资组合在实际中发挥作用。
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Jun;46(6):595-603. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03050.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinician's Commentary.临床医生评论
Physiother Can. 2011 Winter;63(1):86-7. doi: 10.3138/physio.63.1.86. Epub 2011 Jan 20.

本文引用的文献

1
The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications.专业能力评估:发展、研究与实际影响。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 1996 Jan;1(1):41-67. doi: 10.1007/BF00596229.
2
Student experiences of learning portfolios in occupational therapy education.职业治疗教育中学生对学习档案袋的体验。
Occup Ther Health Care. 2007;21(1-2):175-84. doi: 10.1080/J003v21n01_13.
3
Reflective electronic portfolios: a design process for integrating liberal and professional studies and experiential education.反思性电子档案袋:整合通识教育与专业学习及体验式教育的设计过程。
J Allied Health. 2008 Fall;37(3):e140-59.
4
Objective structured clinical evaluation of clinical competence: an integrative review.临床能力的客观结构化临床评估:一项综合综述。
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Aug;65(8):1584-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05054.x. Epub 2009 Jun 1.
5
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
6
Student perceptions of a portfolio assessment process.学生对档案袋评估过程的看法。
Med Educ. 2009 Jan;43(1):89-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03250.x.
7
The feasibility of an electronic reflective practice exercise among physiotherapy students.物理治疗专业学生进行电子反思性实践练习的可行性。
Med Teach. 2008;30(8):e232-8. doi: 10.1080/01421590802258870.
8
Meeting the challenge of assessing clinical competence of occupational therapists within a program management environment.
Can J Occup Ther. 2008 Feb;75(1):51-60. doi: 10.1177/000841740807500109.
9
Continued professional competence and portfolios.持续专业能力与档案袋。
J Trauma Nurs. 2007 Jan-Mar;14(1):24-31. doi: 10.1097/01.JTN.0000264146.57922.be.
10
Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.定性内容分析的三种方法。
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.

使用档案袋评估专业能力的可行性和可接受性。

The feasibility and acceptability of using a portfolio to assess professional competence.

作者信息

Miller Patricia A, Tuekam Rosine

机构信息

Patricia A. Miller, BSc(PT), MHSc, MSc, PhD : Associate Clinical Professor, School of Rehabilitation Science, and holder of the Raymond and Margaret LaBarge Post-doctoral Fellowship for Research and Knowledge Application for Optimal Aging, School of Social Work, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.

出版信息

Physiother Can. 2011 Winter;63(1):78-85. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2009.43. Epub 2011 Jan 20.

DOI:10.3138/ptc.2009.43
PMID:22210983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3024199/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Little is known about physical therapists' views on the use of portfolios to evaluate professional competence. The purpose of this study was to gather the opinions of physical therapists on the feasibility and acceptability of a portfolio prepared to demonstrate evidence of clinical specialization through reported activities and accomplishments related to professional development, leadership, and research.

METHODS

Twenty-nine Canadian physical therapists practising in the neurosciences area were given 8 weeks to prepare a professional portfolio. Participants submitted the portfolio along with a survey addressing the preparation of the portfolio and its role as an assessment tool. Qualitative content analysis was used to interpret the participants' comments.

RESULTS

Participants reported that maintaining organized records facilitated the preparation of their portfolio. They experienced pride when reviewing their completed portfolios, which summarized their professional activities and highlighted their achievements. Concerns were noted about the veracity of self-reported records and the ability of the documentation to provide a comprehensive view of the full scope of the professional competencies required for clinical specialization (e.g., clinical skills).

CONCLUSION

The study's findings support the feasibility and acceptability of a portfolio review to assess professional competence and clinical specialization in physical therapy and have implications for both physical therapists and professional agencies.

摘要

目的

关于物理治疗师对使用档案袋评估专业能力的看法,人们了解甚少。本研究的目的是收集物理治疗师对一份档案袋的可行性和可接受性的意见,该档案袋旨在通过与专业发展、领导力和研究相关的报告活动及成就来展示临床专业化的证据。

方法

29名在神经科学领域执业的加拿大物理治疗师有8周时间来准备一份专业档案袋。参与者提交档案袋时还需附上一份关于档案袋准备情况及其作为评估工具的作用的调查问卷。采用定性内容分析法来解读参与者的评论。

结果

参与者报告称,保持有条理的记录有助于准备档案袋。他们在查看完成的档案袋时感到自豪,这些档案袋总结了他们的专业活动并突出了他们的成就。有人对自我报告记录的真实性以及这些文件能否全面反映临床专业化所需的全部专业能力范围(如临床技能)表示担忧。

结论

该研究结果支持通过档案袋审查来评估物理治疗专业能力和临床专业化的可行性和可接受性,这对物理治疗师和专业机构均有启示。