Perraton Luke, Machotka Zuzana, Kumar Saravana
Luke Perraton, M.Physio (Musc), B.App.Sc (Physio): International Centre for Allied Health Evidence, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia.
Physiother Can. 2011 Winter;63(1):88-93. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2009.44. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the current evidence base for whole-body vibration as a treatment for low back pain (LBP).
Whole-body vibration through occupational exposure has previously been recognized as an aetiological factor in LBP. Previous studies have identified whole-body vibration (WBV) as a cause of LBP in various sitting-based occupations that involve machinery and repetitive vibration. In the last decade, however, WBV has been advocated as a safe and effective treatment for LBP. Despite the growing popularity of WBV in clinical practice, this systematic review of the literature identified only two studies that investigated the effectiveness of WBV as a treatment option for LBP, and an assessment of the quality of these studies demonstrated several methodological problems that may have biased their findings. While there is emerging evidence for the effectiveness of WBV in treating some medical conditions, the evidence for WBV as a treatment for LBP remains equivocal.
Based on the current body of evidence, routine use of WBV to treat LBP should be undertaken with caution. Further rigorous research designed to investigate the effectiveness of WBV as a safe and high-quality treatment for LBP is required.
本系统评价旨在评估全身振动作为治疗腰痛(LBP)的现有证据基础。
职业暴露引起的全身振动先前已被确认为腰痛的一个病因。先前的研究已将全身振动(WBV)确定为各种涉及机械和重复性振动的坐姿职业中腰痛的一个原因。然而,在过去十年中,WBV已被提倡作为一种安全有效的腰痛治疗方法。尽管WBV在临床实践中越来越受欢迎,但对文献的这一系统评价仅发现两项研究调查了WBV作为腰痛治疗选择的有效性,对这些研究质量的评估表明存在几个方法学问题,可能使研究结果产生偏差。虽然有新证据表明WBV在治疗某些疾病方面有效,但WBV作为腰痛治疗方法的证据仍然不明确。
基于目前的证据,应谨慎使用WBV常规治疗腰痛。需要开展进一步的严谨研究,以调查WBV作为一种安全、高质量的腰痛治疗方法的有效性。