Drake R E, Gabel J C
Center for Microvascular and Lymphatic Studies, University of Texas Medical School, Houston 77030.
Am J Physiol. 1990 Oct;259(4 Pt 2):R780-5. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1990.259.4.R780.
We used lymph flow rate (QL) to lymphatic vessel outflow pressure (Po) relationships to analyze lymphatic flow in five unanesthetized sheep with liver lymphatic cannulas. The olecranon was the zero reference level for pressures. Increases in Po did not change QL until Po exceeded 19 +/- 4 (SD) cmH2O. However, for Po greater than 19 +/- 4 cmH2O, QL decreased linearly with increases in Po. We fit regression lines to the QL vs. Po data for Po greater than 19 cmH2O and estimated the effective lymphatic resistance (RL) as -delta Po/delta QL. The effective pressure driving lymph (PL) was the Po at which QL = 0. At baseline, RL = 0.18 +/- 0.10 cmH2O.min.microliter-1 and PL = 29.6 +/- 3.4 cmH2O. When we increased hepatic vein pressure by 5.7 +/- 1.7 cmH2O, QL increased to 6.2 +/- 3.2 times baseline, RL decreased to 0.050 +/- 0.015 cmH2O.min.microliter-1, and PL increased to 37.1 +/- 3.5 cmH2O (P less than 0.05). Thus 1) liver lymph flow is very sensitive to increases in hepatic vein pressure, 2) there is a substantial QL vs. Po plateau for liver lymphatics, and 3) after hepatic venous pressure elevations, liver lymph flow increases as if it were driven by a higher pressure through a lower resistance.
我们利用淋巴流速(QL)与淋巴管流出压力(Po)的关系,对五只植入肝淋巴管插管的未麻醉绵羊的淋巴流动进行了分析。鹰嘴作为压力的零参考水平。在Po超过19±4(标准差)cmH2O之前,Po的增加并不会改变QL。然而,当Po大于19±4 cmH2O时,QL随Po的增加呈线性下降。我们对Po大于19 cmH2O时的QL与Po数据拟合了回归线,并将有效淋巴阻力(RL)估计为-ΔPo/ΔQL。驱动淋巴流动的有效压力(PL)是QL = 0时的Po。在基线时,RL = 0.18±0.10 cmH2O·min·微升-1,PL = 29.6±3.4 cmH2O。当我们将肝静脉压力升高5.7±1.7 cmH2O时,QL增加至基线的6.2±3.2倍,RL降至0.050±0.015 cmH2O·min·微升-1,PL升至37.1±3.5 cmH2O(P<0.05)。因此,1)肝淋巴流动对肝静脉压力的升高非常敏感;2)肝淋巴管存在显著的QL与Po平台期;3)肝静脉压力升高后,肝淋巴流动增加,就好像是由更高的压力通过更低的阻力驱动的。