Department of Behavioral Physiology, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 11103, 9700 CC Groningen, The Netherlands.
Physiol Behav. 2012 Mar 20;105(5):1156-60. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.12.013. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
Adverse and stressful experiences during adolescence are often of a social nature. The social defeat model in rats is used as an animal model for bullying in humans. Usually large individual differences in response to social defeat are found. The personality type that is mostly affected and the underlying mechanisms are unknown. We used male rats of the Roman selection lines to test whether social defeat (between postnatal days 45 and 57) followed by social isolation has a different impact in animals with divergent levels of emotional reactivity and coping style. The level of offensive aggression, impulsivity and performance during frustrating non-reward (extinction) were used as measures for the adult coping style of animals. Impulsivity was measured by performance on an unpredictable operant conditioning schedule (variable interval-15, VI-15) for food reinforcement. This study demonstrates that the adult, baseline level of impulsivity is higher in Roman high avoidance (RHA) rats. RHA rats showed a higher number of lever presses compared to Roman low avoidance (RLA) rats on a VI-15 schedule. The level of offensive aggression did not differ between the two lines. Surprisingly, a tendency towards more offensive aggression in RLA rats was found. Social stress during adolescence disturbed the normal development of adult personality, mostly in RHA rats. RHA rats that were defeated during adolescence reduced the number of lever presses on the VI-15 schedule of reinforcement and were more persistent during a session of frustrating non-reward. However, we did not find an effect of social defeat on performance during extinction. A tendency towards increased attack latencies after social defeat in adolescence was found. The time spent on offensive aggression was unaffected by social defeat.
青少年时期的不良和压力体验通常具有社会性质。大鼠的社会挫败模型被用作人类欺凌的动物模型。通常会发现对社会挫败的反应存在很大的个体差异。受影响最大的人格类型和潜在机制尚不清楚。我们使用罗曼选择系的雄性大鼠来测试在具有不同情绪反应和应对方式水平的动物中,经历社会挫败(在出生后第 45 天至第 57 天之间)后再进行社会隔离是否会产生不同的影响。攻击性攻击、冲动和挫折性非奖励(消退)期间的表现被用作动物成年应对方式的衡量标准。冲动性通过在不可预测的操作性条件作用时间表(可变间隔 15,VI-15)上进行食物强化的表现来衡量。这项研究表明,罗曼高回避(RHA)大鼠的成年基础冲动水平更高。与罗曼低回避(RLA)大鼠相比,RHA 大鼠在 VI-15 时间表上的按压杆次数更多。两条线之间的攻击性攻击水平没有差异。令人惊讶的是,RLA 大鼠表现出更强的攻击性攻击倾向。青春期的社会压力扰乱了成年人格的正常发展,在 RHA 大鼠中尤为明显。青春期被击败的 RHA 大鼠减少了在 VI-15 强化时间表上的按压杆次数,并且在挫折性非奖励期间更加持久。然而,我们没有发现社会挫败对消退期间的表现有影响。在青春期遭受社会挫败后,攻击潜伏期有增加的趋势。攻击性攻击的时间不受社会挫败的影响。