Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa do Hospital do Coração (IEP-HCor), São Paulo, Brazil.
Cardiovasc Ther. 2013 Jun;31(3):147-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5922.2011.00308.x. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
Tight control of blood glucose reduces cardiovascular events and total mortality is conflicting. To summarize clinical effects of tight versus conventional glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes. We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ISI Web of Knowledge with no limits of language and time. Further trials were searched from the reference lists of identified studies. We included randomized controlled comparing different levels of blood glucose control intensity in type 2 diabetic patients. Two independent reviewers extracted data of eligible studies using standard case report forms. We investigated total mortality, cardiovascular and microvascular events, and hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. We used random-effects models to obtain relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We included 6 trials involving 27,654 patients. There was no significant effect of tight blood glucose control on all-cause mortality (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.90-1.17) or cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.83-1.29). Tight glucose control reduced the risk for nonfatal MI (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.76-0.95), although had no effect on the incidence of nonfatal stroke (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.88-1.17). For microvascular events, tight glucose control reduced the risk progression of retinopathy (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.71-0.91), incidence of peripheral neuropathy (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.89-0.99), and progression of nephropathy (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.37-0.80), but had not significant effect on the incidence of nephropathy (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.42-1.14). The risk of severe hypoglycemia increased with tight glucose control (RR 2.39; 95% CI 1.79-3.18). Tight blood glucose control reduces the risk for some macrovascular and microvascular events, without effect on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Tight glucose control increases the risk of severe hypoglycemia.
严格控制血糖可减少心血管事件和总死亡率,但目前结果仍存在争议。本研究旨在系统评价 2 型糖尿病患者强化血糖控制与常规血糖控制的临床疗效。我们系统检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆和 ISI Web of Knowledge 数据库,未对检索语言和时间进行限制,并进一步检索了已纳入研究的参考文献。我们纳入了比较不同强度血糖控制的 2 型糖尿病患者的随机对照试验。两名评价员使用标准病例报告表提取合格研究的数据。我们观察了 2 型糖尿病患者的全因死亡率、心血管和微血管事件及低血糖发生率。我们使用随机效应模型计算相对危险度(RR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。我们共纳入 6 项试验,共计 27654 例患者。严格血糖控制并未降低全因死亡率(RR 1.03,95%CI 0.901.17)或心血管死亡率(RR 1.04,95%CI 0.831.29)。严格血糖控制降低了非致死性心肌梗死(RR 0.85,95%CI 0.760.95)的风险,但对非致死性卒中(RR 1.02,95%CI 0.881.17)的发生率无影响。对于微血管事件,严格血糖控制降低了视网膜病变进展(RR 0.80,95%CI 0.710.91)、周围神经病变发生率(RR 0.94,95%CI 0.890.99)和肾病进展(RR 0.55,95%CI 0.370.80)的风险,但对肾病发生率(RR 0.69,95%CI 0.421.14)无影响。严重低血糖的风险随严格血糖控制而增加(RR 2.39,95%CI 1.79~3.18)。严格血糖控制可降低某些大血管和微血管事件的风险,但对全因死亡率和心血管死亡率无影响。严格血糖控制增加了严重低血糖的风险。