Suppr超能文献

快速序列命名与阅读能力:词汇通达的作用。

Rapid serial naming and reading ability: the role of lexical access.

作者信息

Logan Jessica A R, Schatschneider Christopher, Wagner Richard K

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Florida State University, 1107 W. Call St., Tallahassee, FL 32306-4301, USA.

出版信息

Read Writ. 2011 Jan;24(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s11145-009-9199-1.

Abstract

Rapid serial naming tasks are frequently used to explain variance in reading skill. However, the construct being measured by rapid naming is yet undetermined. The Phonological Processing theory suggests that rapid naming relates to reading because of similar demands of access to long-term stored phonological representations of visual stimuli. Some researchers have argued that isolated or discrete-trial naming is a more precise measure of lexical access than serial naming, thus it is likely that any shared variance between these two formats can be attributed to similar lexical access demands. The present study examined whether there remained any variance in reading ability that could be uniquely explained by the rapid naming task while controlling for isolated naming. Structural equation modeling was used to examine these relations within the context of the phonological processing model. Results indicated that serial naming uniquely predicted reading, and the relation was stronger with isolated naming controlled for, suggesting that isolated naming functioned as a suppressor variable in the relation of serial naming with reading.

摘要

快速序列命名任务经常被用来解释阅读技能的差异。然而,快速命名所测量的结构尚未确定。语音加工理论认为,快速命名与阅读相关,因为获取视觉刺激的长期存储语音表征有相似的要求。一些研究者认为,孤立或离散试验命名比序列命名更能精确测量词汇通达,因此这两种形式之间的任何共同差异都可能归因于相似的词汇通达需求。本研究在控制孤立命名的情况下,考察了快速命名任务是否仍能唯一解释阅读能力的差异。采用结构方程模型在语音加工模型的背景下检验这些关系。结果表明,序列命名能唯一预测阅读,且在控制了孤立命名的情况下,这种关系更强,这表明孤立命名在序列命名与阅读的关系中起到了抑制变量的作用。

相似文献

1
Rapid serial naming and reading ability: the role of lexical access.
Read Writ. 2011 Jan;24(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s11145-009-9199-1.
2
Integrity of input verbal short-term memory ability predicts naming accuracy in aphasia.
Aphasiology. 2023;37(6):813-834. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2022.2043233. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
3
Using Serial and Discrete Digit Naming to Unravel Word Reading Processes.
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 13;9:524. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00524. eCollection 2018.
4
The relation of visual attention span with serial and discrete rapid automatized naming and reading.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Jul;207:105093. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105093. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
5
The role of speed of processing, rapid naming, and phonological awareness in reading achievement.
J Learn Disabil. 2002 Nov-Dec;35(6):509-24. doi: 10.1177/00222194020350060301.
6
What mechanism underlies the rapid automatized naming-reading relation?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Jun;194:104840. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104840. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
7
What does rapid automatized naming measure? A new RAN task compared to naming and lexical decision.
Brain Lang. 2004 Jul-Sep;90(1-3):47-62. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00419-X.
8
How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(3):563-80. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.658820. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
9
Predicting the reading skill of Japanese children.
Brain Dev. 2017 Feb;39(2):112-121. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Between-word processing and text-level skills contributing to fluent reading of (non)word lists and text.
Read Writ. 2025;38(3):671-697. doi: 10.1007/s11145-024-10533-8. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
3
Lexical access speed and the development of phonological recoding during immediate serial recall.
J Cogn Dev. 2022;23(5):624-643. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2022.2083140. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
4
To Name or Not to Name: Eye Movements and Semantic Processing in RAN and Reading.
Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 29;11(7):866. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11070866.
5
Phonological Awareness as the Foundation of Reading Acquisition in Students Reading in Transparent Orthography.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 19;18(10):5440. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105440.
6
Eye Movements During RAN as an Operationalization of the RAN-Reading "Microcosm".
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Mar 3;14:67. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00067. eCollection 2020.
7
Pre-schoolers' visual perception and attention networks influencing naming speed: An individual difference perspective.
Heliyon. 2019 Oct 16;5(10):e02587. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02587. eCollection 2019 Oct.
8
Structural and functional asymmetry of the language network emerge in early childhood.
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Oct;39:100682. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100682. Epub 2019 Jul 21.
9
Using Serial and Discrete Digit Naming to Unravel Word Reading Processes.
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 13;9:524. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00524. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Elucidating the component processes involved in dyslexic and non-dyslexic reading fluency: an eye-tracking study.
Cognition. 2008 Dec;109(3):389-407. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.005. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
2
An experimental comparison between rival theories of rapid automatized naming performance and its relationship to reading.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2007 Sep;98(1):46-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2007.04.003. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
3
The double-deficit hypothesis: a comprehensive analysis of the evidence.
J Learn Disabil. 2006 Jan-Feb;39(1):25-47. doi: 10.1177/00222194060390010401.
4
Reception class predictors of literacy skills.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2005 Jun;75(Pt 2):171-88. doi: 10.1348/000709904X24780.
6
Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: a conceptual review.
J Learn Disabil. 2000 Jul-Aug;33(4):387-407. doi: 10.1177/002221940003300409.
7
Measures of information processing in rapid automatized naming (RAN) and their relation to reading.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2001 Apr;78(4):359-73. doi: 10.1006/jecp.2000.2576.
10
Reaction times and dyslexia.
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1994 Feb;47(1):29-48. doi: 10.1080/14640749408401142.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验