Vander Stappen Caroline, Reybroeck Marie Van
Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 13;9:320. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00320. eCollection 2018.
Phonological awareness (PA) and rapid automatized naming (RAN) have been shown to be powerful predictors of reading achievement across many languages. However, literature remains unclear: (a) whether RAN is independent of PA, (b) about the specific influences of PA and RAN on reading and spelling, and (c) about the efficacy of a RAN intervention. This study aims to address these issues by means of an intervention design. Precisely, the objectives are (a) to determine whether training one competence involves or not an effect on the other, (b) to examine whether each intervention based on oral abilities (PA vs. RAN) could improve word reading and word spelling performances, and (c) to assess the efficacy of a RAN-objects' intervention. Thirty-six French-speaking second graders, from two Belgian elementary schools, were divided into two groups, and received either a PA- or a RAN-objects' intervention. Twenty-five-minute lessons took place at school twice a week over a period of 2 months. Both groups were compared on multiple experimental measures (PA, RAN, word reading, and word spelling), before and immediately after the intervention, and 6 months later. Results showed specific efficacy of the two interventions, with participants trained in one ability outperforming those from the other group on this specific ability at post-test. Moreover, the PA intervention revealed transfer effects on the sub-lexical processes of spelling, while the RAN intervention enhanced word reading speed. Finally, the results demonstrated the efficacy of a RAN-objects' intervention for the first time. These findings provide a new piece of evidence showing the independence of PA and RAN, each process influencing the acquisition of literacy skills in a different way. The efficacy and the specific transfer effects of both interventions open up new perspectives for prevention and targeted remediation of reading disabilities.
语音意识(PA)和快速自动命名(RAN)已被证明是多种语言阅读成绩的有力预测指标。然而,相关文献仍不明确:(a)RAN是否独立于PA;(b)PA和RAN对阅读和拼写的具体影响;以及(c)RAN干预的效果。本研究旨在通过干预设计来解决这些问题。具体而言,目标是:(a)确定训练一种能力是否会对另一种能力产生影响;(b)检验基于口语能力的每种干预(PA与RAN)是否能提高单词阅读和单词拼写表现;以及(c)评估RAN-物体干预的效果。来自比利时两所小学的36名说法语的二年级学生被分成两组,分别接受PA或RAN-物体干预。为期2个月,每周两次在学校进行25分钟的课程。在干预前、干预后立即以及6个月后,对两组在多项实验指标(PA、RAN、单词阅读和单词拼写)上进行比较。结果显示两种干预都有特定效果,接受一种能力训练的参与者在测试后在该特定能力上的表现优于另一组。此外,PA干预显示出对拼写的次词汇过程有迁移效应,而RAN干预提高了单词阅读速度。最后,结果首次证明了RAN-物体干预的效果。这些发现提供了新的证据,表明PA和RAN是独立的,每个过程以不同方式影响读写技能的习得。两种干预的效果和特定迁移效应为阅读障碍的预防和针对性补救开辟了新的视角。