Suppr超能文献

全面的血清谱分析用于发现上皮性卵巢癌生物标志物。

Comprehensive serum profiling for the discovery of epithelial ovarian cancer biomarkers.

机构信息

Correlogic Systems, Inc., Germantown, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e29533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029533. Epub 2011 Dec 21.

Abstract

FDA-cleared ovarian cancer biomarkers are limited to CA-125 and HE4 for monitoring and recurrence and OVA1, a multivariate panel consisting of CA-125 and four additional biomarkers, for referring patients to a specialist. Due to relatively poor performance of these tests, more accurate and broadly applicable biomarkers are needed. We evaluated the dysregulation of 259 candidate cancer markers in serum samples from 499 patients. Sera were collected prospectively at 11 monitored sites under a single well-defined protocol. All stages of ovarian cancer and common benign gynecological conditions were represented. To ensure consistency and comparability of biomarker comparisons, all measurements were performed on a single platform, at a single site, using a panel of rigorously calibrated, qualified, high-throughput, multiplexed immunoassays and all analyses were conducted using the same software. Each marker was evaluated independently for its ability to differentiate ovarian cancer from benign conditions. A total of 175 markers were dysregulated in the cancer samples. HE4 (AUC=0.933) and CA-125 (AUC=0.907) were the most informative biomarkers, followed by IL-2 receptor α, α1-antitrypsin, C-reactive protein, YKL-40, cellular fibronectin, CA-72-4 and prostasin (AUC>0.800). To improve the discrimination between cancer and benign conditions, a simple multivariate combination of markers was explored using logistic regression. When combined into a single panel, the nine most informative individual biomarkers yielded an AUC value of 0.950, significantly higher than obtained when combining the markers in the OVA1 panel (AUC 0.912). Additionally, at a threshold sensitivity of 90%, the combination of the top 9 markers gave 88.9% specificity compared to 63.4% specificity for the OVA1 markers. Although a blinded validation study has not yet been performed, these results indicate that alternative biomarker combinations might lead to significant improvements in the detection of ovarian cancer.

摘要

FDA 批准的卵巢癌生物标志物仅限于用于监测和复发的 CA-125 和 HE4,以及 OVA1,后者是一个由 CA-125 和另外四个生物标志物组成的多变量检测面板,用于将患者转介给专家。由于这些检测的性能相对较差,因此需要更准确和广泛适用的生物标志物。我们评估了来自 499 名患者的血清样本中 259 种候选癌症标志物的失调情况。这些血清是根据单一明确协议在 11 个监测点前瞻性收集的。卵巢癌的所有阶段和常见的良性妇科疾病都有代表。为了确保生物标志物比较的一致性和可比性,所有测量都是在单个平台上,在单个站点上进行的,使用经过严格校准、合格、高通量、多重免疫分析试剂盒,并且所有分析都是使用相同的软件进行的。每个标志物都被独立评估其区分卵巢癌与良性疾病的能力。共有 175 种标志物在癌症样本中失调。HE4(AUC=0.933)和 CA-125(AUC=0.907)是最具信息量的生物标志物,其次是 IL-2 受体α、α1-抗胰蛋白酶、C 反应蛋白、YKL-40、细胞纤连蛋白、CA-72-4 和前激肽释放酶(AUC>0.800)。为了提高对癌症和良性疾病的区分能力,我们使用逻辑回归探索了简单的多变量标志物组合。当组合成单个面板时,九个最具信息量的个体标志物的 AUC 值为 0.950,明显高于 OVA1 面板中标志物的 AUC 值(0.912)。此外,在 90%的敏感性阈值下,与 OVA1 标志物的 63.4%特异性相比,前 9 个标志物的组合特异性为 88.9%。虽然尚未进行盲法验证研究,但这些结果表明替代生物标志物组合可能会显著提高卵巢癌的检测率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验