• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物操纵以获取所需剂量:系统评价。

The manipulation of drugs to obtain the required dose: systematic review.

机构信息

Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2012 Sep;68(9):2103-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05916.x. Epub 2012 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05916.x
PMID:22221111
Abstract

AIM

To describe the development of a systematic review protocol that maps the evidence relating to drug manipulations conducted to obtain the required dose. This process included defining a search strategy and methods to assess the quality and to synthesize the evidence retrieved.

BACKGROUND

Economic constraints mean that marketed formulations may not meet the needs of all patients. Consequently, it is sometimes necessary to manipulate marketed products with the aim of obtaining the required dose. Most clinical practice appears to be guided by ad hoc approaches and informal literature reviews.

METHODS

This systematic review protocol has been designed to identify the evidence available on drug manipulation. The review aims to identify what evidence is available and where the gaps appear in the current evidence. This report describes the challenges of developing a systematic review in an area that potentially involves many drugs and considers outcomes other than effectiveness. In particular, searches required the use of non-specific terms and the iterative development of a complex search strategy. The development of quality assessment criteria is also described. Funding commenced in April 2009.

DISCUSSION

The systematic review described here will capture a broad selection of research about drug manipulations and may also be of interest to those conducting reviews in broad remit subject areas that are not easy to define using accepted terminology.

摘要

目的

描述一个系统综述方案的制定过程,该方案旨在绘制与为获得所需剂量而进行的药物操作相关的证据。这一过程包括定义搜索策略和方法,以评估检索到的证据的质量并对其进行综合。

背景

经济限制意味着上市制剂可能无法满足所有患者的需求。因此,有时有必要对上市产品进行操作,以获得所需的剂量。大多数临床实践似乎都是基于临时方法和非正式文献综述。

方法

本系统综述方案旨在确定现有的药物操作证据。该综述旨在确定现有证据的情况,并确定当前证据中的空白点。本报告描述了在一个可能涉及多种药物的领域制定系统综述所面临的挑战,并考虑了有效性以外的其他结果。特别是,搜索需要使用非特定术语,并迭代开发复杂的搜索策略。质量评估标准的制定也将进行描述。资金于 2009 年 4 月开始。

讨论

这里描述的系统综述将涵盖广泛的关于药物操作的研究,对于那些在不易使用公认术语定义的广泛主题领域进行综述的人来说,也可能具有一定的参考价值。

相似文献

1
The manipulation of drugs to obtain the required dose: systematic review.药物操纵以获取所需剂量:系统评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Sep;68(9):2103-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05916.x. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
2
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
5
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
9
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges and Considerations in Manipulating Oral Dosage Forms in Paediatric Healthcare Settings: A Narrative Review.儿科医疗环境中口服剂型给药的挑战与考量:一篇叙述性综述
Acta Paediatr. 2025 Oct;114(10):2480-2489. doi: 10.1111/apa.70199. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
2
Application of a screening tool to understand the medication habits of patients with swallowing difficulty: a prospective observational study.应用筛查工具了解吞咽困难患者的用药习惯:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Mar 27. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01901-7.
3
Exploring Manipulated Prescribed Medicines for Novel Leads in 3D Printed Personalized Dosage Forms.
探索用于3D打印个性化剂型新先导化合物的被操纵的处方药。
Pharmaceutics. 2025 Feb 18;17(2):271. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17020271.
4
Considerations and expectations for the administration of dispersible arpraziquantel to young children: a landscape analysis.给幼儿服用可分散片剂阿苯达唑的考量与期望:一项现状分析
Int Health. 2025 Jul 1;17(4):527-534. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihae092.
5
Point Prevalence Survey of Acute Hospital Patients with Difficulty Swallowing Solid Oral Dose Forms.急性医院中吞咽固体口服剂型困难患者的现患率调查
Pharmaceutics. 2024 Apr 25;16(5):584. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16050584.
6
Development and evaluation of an assessment of the age-appropriateness/inappropriateness of formulations used in children.儿童用药剂型适宜性/不适宜性评估工具的研制与评价。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Dec;44(6):1394-1405. doi: 10.1007/s11096-022-01478-5. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
7
Creating Acceptable Tablets 3D (CAT 3D): A Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Acceptability of 3D Printed Tablets in Children and Young People.创建可接受的片剂3D(CAT 3D):一项评估3D打印片剂在儿童和青少年中可接受性的可行性研究。
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Feb 25;14(3):516. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14030516.
8
Solid Oral Dosage Forms Use in Adults with Neurological Disorders and Swallowing Difficulties: A Scoping Review.固体口服剂型在患有神经障碍和吞咽困难的成年人中的应用:范围综述。
Dysphagia. 2022 Aug;37(4):909-922. doi: 10.1007/s00455-021-10352-x. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
9
Prescribing medicines to older people-How to consider the impact of ageing on human organ and body functions.给老年人开药——如何考虑衰老对人体器官和身体功能的影响。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Oct;86(10):1921-1930. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14094. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
10
Accuracy of intravenous and enteral preparations involving small volumes for paediatric use: a review.儿科用小容量静脉和肠内制剂的准确性:综述
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2018 Mar;25(2):66-71. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2016-001117. Epub 2017 Jan 4.