Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
J Comp Physiol B. 2012 Jul;182(5):603-11. doi: 10.1007/s00360-011-0639-2. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
A nectar diet is simple in nutritional composition and easily digested, but may vary greatly in its proportions of sugar and water. Here, we apply the geometric framework, a modelling approach for investigating how animals balance nutrient needs in multidimensional and dynamic nutritional environments, to captive whitebellied sunbirds (Cinnyris talatala). We address the question of how these small birds (~8 g) prioritise sugar and water intake, and how dietary salt content interacts with sugar and water intake. Sunbirds kept at 20°C and provided with moderate to high sucrose concentrations (≥1 M), together with supplementary water, converge on an intake target of 2.79 g day(-1) of sucrose and 7.72 g day(-1) of water: equivalent to 0.85 M sucrose. When the birds are given more dilute sucrose concentrations, they defend their sugar intake by over-ingesting water, up to a ceiling of 47 g day(-1). Sugar intake thus gets priority over water intake, but the birds have a finite capacity to over-ingest water to gain the target level of sugar. Regulation appears to be less precise when birds are given a choice between two sucrose solutions than when they choose between a sugar solution and supplementary water. Intake targets vary in response to internal and external factors, and sunbirds increase their sugar intake in response to increased activity and cold, irrespective of nectar concentration. They also compensate for interruptions in foraging activity, whether overnight or during the day. Interactive effects become evident when sodium is included as a third nutrient: on very dilute nectar (≤0.1 M), where sunbirds lose body mass, the addition of sodium to the diet helps to achieve the carbohydrate intake target, while raising the ceiling on water intake. This analysis provides a new perspective on nectarivory, while adding to the comparative database on nutrient regulation and emphasising water as a nutrient.
花蜜饮食的营养成分简单,易于消化,但糖和水的比例可能有很大差异。在这里,我们应用几何框架,这是一种用于研究动物如何在多维和动态营养环境中平衡营养需求的建模方法,来研究圈养的白腹花蜜鸟(Cinnyris talatala)。我们提出了一个问题,即这些小鸟(~8 g)如何优先考虑糖和水的摄入,以及饮食中的盐含量如何与糖和水的摄入相互作用。在 20°C 下饲养并提供中等至高浓度的蔗糖(≥1 M),同时补充水的花蜜鸟,其蔗糖摄入量的目标收敛在 2.79 g/天,水摄入量为 7.72 g/天:相当于 0.85 M 蔗糖。当鸟类摄入更稀的蔗糖浓度时,它们会通过过度摄入水来保护糖的摄入量,上限为 47 g/天。因此,糖的摄入优先于水的摄入,但鸟类过度摄入水以达到目标糖水平的能力是有限的。当鸟类在两种蔗糖溶液之间做出选择时,其调节机制不如在选择糖溶液和补充水之间时那么精确。摄入目标会根据内部和外部因素而变化,花蜜鸟会增加糖的摄入量以应对活动增加和寒冷,而不管花蜜浓度如何。它们还会补偿觅食活动的中断,无论是在夜间还是白天。当将钠作为第三种营养素纳入时,交互效应变得明显:在非常稀的花蜜(≤0.1 M)中,花蜜鸟会失去体重,在饮食中添加钠有助于达到碳水化合物的摄入目标,同时提高水的摄入上限。这项分析为花蜜取食提供了一个新的视角,同时增加了关于营养调节的比较数据库,并强调了水作为一种营养素的重要性。