Krisiunas Ed
WNWN International - Waste Not, Want Not, Burlington, Connecticut 06013, USA.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 Nov 1;5(6):1453-4. doi: 10.1177/193229681100500618.
There has been an upsurge in interest in monitoring the cleanliness of the health care environment as it relates to disease transmission. Cleaning and disinfecting practices are nothing new in health care facilities. However, continued development of analytical medical products such as point-of-care devices or, as in this review, glucose meters, has created potential risks to patients on a number of levels. Examples are (1) inappropriate disinfection of glucose meters so that the risk of disease transmission is increased and (2) cleaning agents potentially affecting glucose reading accuracy. Cleaning and disinfection recommendations have become available to address these issues. In this issue of Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, Sarmaga and colleagues discuss the impact of a disinfecting agent on results generated from a particular device, which suggests that not all equipment are created equal and not all practices/products used to clean and disinfect are the same. It appears that more interaction must take place between vendors of these technologies as well as vendors of cleaning/disinfecting agents and the end users who will be performing all the requisite tasks to ensure a high quality product as well as care.
随着与疾病传播相关的医疗保健环境清洁度监测受到越来越多的关注。清洁和消毒措施在医疗保健机构中并不新鲜。然而,诸如即时检测设备或(如本综述中的)血糖仪等分析医疗产品的持续发展,在多个层面给患者带来了潜在风险。例如:(1)血糖仪消毒不当,从而增加疾病传播风险;(2)清洁剂可能影响血糖读数准确性。针对这些问题,已有清洁和消毒建议可供参考。在本期《糖尿病科学与技术杂志》中,萨尔马加及其同事讨论了一种消毒剂对特定设备所产生结果的影响,这表明并非所有设备都是一样的,而且并非所有用于清洁和消毒的做法/产品都是相同的。看来,这些技术的供应商以及清洁/消毒剂供应商与将执行所有必要任务以确保高质量产品和护理的最终用户之间必须进行更多互动。