• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科医生手术量对主动脉瓣置换术结果的影响。

Influence of surgeon volume on outcomes with aortic valve replacement.

机构信息

Medical City Dallas Hospital, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Apr;93(4):1107-12; discussion 1112-3. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.09.064. Epub 2012 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.09.064
PMID:22226491
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A volume-outcome association has been shown for cardiovascular procedures such as coronary artery bypass grafting. The association of a volume-outcome relationship for aortic valve replacement procedures, however, has not been clearly defined. We evaluated the influence of surgeon volume on operative outcomes with isolated aortic valve replacement and aortic valve replacement with concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting.

METHODS

One thousand six hundred thirty-five patients were identified as having either isolated aortic valve replacement or aortic valve replacement plus coronary artery bypass grafting between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2009. Patients were divided into three equal terciles using their Society of Thoracic Surgery Predicted Risk of Mortality scores. Data were retrieved on 14 surgeons with complete data records in our Society of Thoracic Surgery database covering a minimum 5-year period (mean, 8.9 ± 1.5 years; median, 10 years).

RESULTS

Clinically significant increases are seen in operative mortality, permanent stroke, renal failure, prolonged ventilation, and hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay in the high-risk compared with low-risk groups. The low-risk patient group has the smallest observed to expected ratio, less than 50%, whereas in the high-risk group the ratio is greater than 1. Odds ratios demonstrate that as surgeon volume increases, outcomes improve correspondingly (ie, odds ratio <1). In low-risk patients, five of ten major complications demonstrated improved outcomes with increased surgeon volume; in medium and high-risk groups eight of ten were improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeon volumes have a significant influence on operative outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement or aortic valve replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting.

摘要

背景

已有研究表明,心血管手术(如冠状动脉旁路移植术)存在量效关系。然而,主动脉瓣置换术的量效关系尚未明确界定。我们评估了外科医生手术量对单纯主动脉瓣置换术和主动脉瓣置换术联合冠状动脉旁路移植术的手术结果的影响。

方法

2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2009 年 12 月 31 日期间,共确定了 1635 例接受单纯主动脉瓣置换术或主动脉瓣置换术联合冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者。根据胸外科协会预测死亡率评分,患者被分为三个相等的三分位数。我们从胸外科协会数据库中检索了 14 位外科医生的数据,这些外科医生的数据记录完整,且覆盖至少 5 年(平均 8.9 ± 1.5 年;中位数 10 年)。

结果

与低危组相比,高危组的手术死亡率、永久性中风、肾衰竭、通气延长以及住院和重症监护病房的住院时间均显著增加。低危患者组的观察到的与预期的比值最小,小于 50%,而高危患者组的比值大于 1。比值比表明,随着外科医生手术量的增加,手术结果相应改善(即比值比<1)。在低危患者中,五种主要并发症中的五种随着外科医生手术量的增加而改善;在中危和高危组中,有八种主要并发症得到改善。

结论

外科医生手术量对高危患者行主动脉瓣置换术或主动脉瓣置换术联合冠状动脉旁路移植术的手术结果有显著影响。

相似文献

1
Influence of surgeon volume on outcomes with aortic valve replacement.外科医生手术量对主动脉瓣置换术结果的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Apr;93(4):1107-12; discussion 1112-3. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.09.064. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
2
Outcomes of concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting at teaching hospitals versus nonteaching hospitals.教学医院与非教学医院行主动脉瓣置换同期冠状动脉旁路移植术的结局。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Mar;143(3):648-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.04.041. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
3
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 3--valve plus coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.胸外科医师协会2008年心脏手术风险模型:第3部分——瓣膜置换加冠状动脉搭桥手术
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;88(1 Suppl):S43-62. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.05.055.
4
Excellent short- and long-term outcomes after concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting performed by surgeons in training.培训外科医生同期行主动脉瓣置换术和冠状动脉旁路移植术的短期和长期效果良好。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Feb;145(2):334-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.073. Epub 2012 Oct 27.
5
Effect of concomitant coronary artery disease on procedural and late outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.合并冠状动脉疾病对经导管主动脉瓣植入术的手术和晚期结果的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Mar;89(3):758-67; discussion 767. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.12.033.
6
Aortic valve replacement and concomitant coronary artery bypass: assessing the impact of multiple grafts.主动脉瓣置换术与同期冠状动脉搭桥术:评估多支移植血管的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Mar;83(3):969-78. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.10.027.
7
Outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement in moderate risk patients: implications for determination of equipoise in the transcatheter era.外科主动脉瓣置换术在中危患者中的结局:对介入时代均衡判断的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):127-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.036. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
8
Is the aortic valve pathology type different for early and late mortality in concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass surgery?在同期主动脉瓣置换术和冠状动脉旁路移植术中,早期和晚期死亡率的主动脉瓣病理类型是否不同?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009 Oct;9(4):630-4. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.206078. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
9
Aortic valve replacement in patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting: 10-year experience.主动脉瓣置换术治疗既往冠状动脉旁路移植术患者:10 年经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Mar;41(3):e1-6. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr212. Epub 2011 Dec 26.
10
Inhibition of complement activation by pexelizumab reduces death in patients undergoing combined aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass surgery.培塞利珠单抗抑制补体激活可降低接受主动脉瓣置换术和冠状动脉搭桥术联合手术患者的死亡率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Feb;131(2):352-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.10.011.

引用本文的文献

1
Do Social Deprivation and Surgical Volume Influence Outcomes Following Distal Radius Fracture Fixation?社会剥夺和手术量会影响桡骨远端骨折固定术后的结果吗?
Hand (N Y). 2024 Jul 30:15589447241265518. doi: 10.1177/15589447241265518.
2
[Learning curve and clinical efficacy of aortic surgery through upper hemisternotomy].[经上半胸骨切开术行主动脉手术的学习曲线及临床疗效]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2023 Nov 20;43(11):1919-1925. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2023.11.12.
3
Institutional case volume and mortality after aortic and mitral valve replacement: a nationwide study in two Korean cohorts.
主动脉瓣和二尖瓣置换术后的机构病例量和死亡率:两个韩国队列的全国性研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Aug 20;17(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01945-0.
4
In a large-volume multidisciplinary setting individual surgeon volume does not impact LVAD outcomes.在大容量多学科环境中,个体外科医生的手术量不会影响 LVAD 结果。
J Card Surg. 2022 Oct;37(10):3290-3299. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16783. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
5
Surgical medical treatment for infective endocarditis in patients on dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.透析患者感染性心内膜炎的外科治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ren Fail. 2022 Dec;44(1):706-713. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2064756.
6
How Referring Providers Choose Specialists for Their Patients: a Systematic Review.介绍医生如何为患者选择专家:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Oct;37(13):3444-3452. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07574-6. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
7
Center Variability in Medicare Claims-Based Publicly Reported Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Outcome Measures.医疗保险基于索赔的经导管主动脉瓣置换术结果报告指标的中心变异性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Nov 2;10(21):e021629. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021629. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
8
The dialysis facility levels and sizes are associated with outcomes of incident hemodialysis patients.透析设施的水平和规模与新进入血液透析患者的结局相关。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 18;11(1):20560. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00177-x.
9
Specialized thoracic aortic team is the next step in improving outcome in acute aortic dissection care.专业的胸主动脉团队是改善急性主动脉夹层护理结果的下一步举措。
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Oct;12(10):6112-6114. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2020-24.
10
Role of Hospital Volumes in Identifying Low-Performing and High-Performing Aortic and Mitral Valve Surgical Centers in the United States.美国医院容量在识别低绩效和高绩效主动脉瓣及二尖瓣手术中心中的作用。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Dec 1;2(12):1322-1331. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.4003.