• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

介绍医生如何为患者选择专家:系统评价。

How Referring Providers Choose Specialists for Their Patients: a Systematic Review.

机构信息

NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Oct;37(13):3444-3452. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07574-6. Epub 2022 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-022-07574-6
PMID:35441300
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9550909/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physician referrals are a critical step in directing patients to high-quality specialists. Despite efforts to encourage referrals to high-volume hospitals, many patients receive treatment at low-volume centers with worse outcomes. We aimed to determine the most important factors considered by referring providers when selecting specialists for their patients through a systematic review of medical and surgical literature.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were searched from January 2000 to July 2021 using terms related to referrals, specialty, surgery, primary care, and decision-making. We included survey and interview studies reporting the factors considered by healthcare providers as they refer patients to specialists in the USA. Studies were screened by two independent reviewers. Quality was assessed using the CASP Checklist. A qualitative thematic analysis was performed to synthesize common decision factors across studies.

RESULTS

We screened 1,972 abstracts and identified 7 studies for inclusion, reporting on 1,575 providers. Thematic analysis showed that referring providers consider factors related to the specialist's clinical expertise (skill, training, outcomes, and assessments), interactions between the patient and specialist (prior experience, rapport, location, scheduling, preference, and insurance), and interactions between the referring physician and specialist (personal relationships, communication, reputation, reciprocity, and practice or system affiliation). Notably, studies did not describe how providers assess clinical or technical skills.

CONCLUSIONS

Referring providers rely on subjective factors and assessments to evaluate quality when selecting a specialist. There may be a role for guidelines and objective measures of quality to inform the choice of specialist by referring providers.

摘要

背景

医生转介是指导患者就诊高质量专家的关键步骤。尽管已经努力鼓励向高容量医院转介,但许多患者仍在低容量中心接受治疗,结果更差。我们旨在通过对医学和外科文献的系统回顾,确定转介医生在为患者选择专家时考虑的最重要因素。

方法

使用与转介、专业、手术、初级保健和决策相关的术语,从 2000 年 1 月至 2021 年 7 月在 PubMed 和 Embase 上进行了搜索。我们纳入了报告美国医疗保健提供者在向专家转介患者时考虑因素的调查和访谈研究。研究由两名独立审查员进行筛选。使用 CASP 清单评估质量。通过定性主题分析对研究中常见的决策因素进行综合。

结果

我们筛选了 1972 篇摘要,确定了 7 项符合纳入标准的研究,共报告了 1575 名提供者。主题分析表明,转介提供者考虑与专家临床专业知识相关的因素(技能、培训、结果和评估)、患者与专家之间的互动(既往经验、融洽度、位置、日程安排、偏好和保险)以及转介医生与专家之间的互动(人际关系、沟通、声誉、互惠和实践或系统隶属关系)。值得注意的是,这些研究并未描述提供者如何评估临床或技术技能。

结论

转介提供者在选择专家时依赖主观因素和评估来评估质量。可能需要指南和客观质量措施来为转介提供者选择专家提供信息。

相似文献

1
How Referring Providers Choose Specialists for Their Patients: a Systematic Review.介绍医生如何为患者选择专家:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Oct;37(13):3444-3452. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07574-6. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
2
Reasons for choice of referral physician among primary care and specialist physicians.基层医疗医生和专科医生转诊医生选择的原因。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 May;27(5):506-12. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1861-z. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Referring and Specialist Physician Gender and Specialist Billing.转诊医生和专科医生的性别与专科计费。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2328347. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28347.
5
Coordination of specialty referrals and physician satisfaction with referral care.专科转诊的协调以及医生对转诊护理的满意度。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 May;154(5):499-506. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.154.5.499.
6
A Qualitative Study of Primary Care Providers' Experiences with the Veterans Choice Program.一项关于初级保健提供者对退伍军人选择计划体验的定性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Apr;34(4):598-603. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4810-2. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
7
Determinants and impact of generalist-specialist communication about pediatric outpatient referrals.儿科门诊转诊中全科医生与专科医生沟通的决定因素及影响
Pediatrics. 2006 Oct;118(4):1341-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-3010.
8
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
9
How many referrals to a pediatric orthopaedic hospital specialty clinic are primary care problems?有多少转诊至小儿骨科专科医院专科门诊的病例是初级保健问题?
J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Oct-Nov;32(7):732-6. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31826994a4.
10
Dropping the baton: specialty referrals in the United States.接力棒掉落:美国的专科转诊。
Milbank Q. 2011 Mar;89(1):39-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00619.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors affecting general practitioners' referrals of patients to hip and knee arthroplasty: a focus group study from Northern Norway.影响全科医生将患者转诊至髋关节和膝关节置换术的因素:来自挪威北部的一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 20;25(1):727. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12774-x.
2
"My Quality of Life is Not There. I'm Dying Here. I Cannot Take This Anymore." Exploring Patient Experiences With Surgical Wait Times in Otolaryngology: A Mixed Methods Study.“我的生活质量不复存在。我在这里日渐衰弱。我再也无法忍受了。”探索耳鼻喉科手术等待时间患者的经历:一项混合方法研究。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;54:19160216251321456. doi: 10.1177/19160216251321456. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
3
Surgical Second Opinion for Pancreatic Cancer Patients.胰腺癌患者的手术二次诊断意见
J Am Coll Surg. 2025 Mar 1;240(3):270-278. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001213. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
4
Comparison of Simulated Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer Surgery at the Highest-Performing vs Chosen Local Hospitals.最高绩效医院与选择的当地医院结直肠癌手术模拟结果比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2255999. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55999.
5
Simulated data-driven hospital selection for surgical treatment of well-differentiated thyroid cancer in older adults.模拟数据驱动的老年分化型甲状腺癌手术治疗医院选择。
Surgery. 2023 Jan;173(1):207-214. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.05.047. Epub 2022 Oct 22.

本文引用的文献

1
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
2
Assessment of Racial Disparities in Primary Care Physician Specialty Referrals.评估初级保健医生专业转诊中的种族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2029238. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29238.
3
Should Interventional Cardiologists Super-Subspecialize?: Moving From Patient Selection to Operator Selection.介入心脏病专家应该进行超级亚专业细分吗?从患者选择到术者选择的转变。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan 11;14(1):97-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.029.
4
Understanding How Providers and Staff Make Decisions About Where to Refer Their Patients: A Qualitative Study.理解提供者和员工如何决定将其患者转介到何处:一项定性研究。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2021 Jan/Mar;44(1):21-30. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000367.
5
Hand Surgery Referral Pattern Preferences Among Primary Care Physicians in Academic Centers in the Southeastern United States.美国东南部学术中心初级保健医生对手外科转诊模式的偏好
Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Dec;85(6):622-625. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002549.
6
Provider Viewpoints in the Management and Referral of Rectal Cancer.提供者对直肠癌的管理和转诊的观点。
J Surg Res. 2021 Feb;258:370-380. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.08.073. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
7
Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews.混合方法系统评价实施的方法学指南。
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2108-2118. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00169.
8
Internal medicine residents identify gaps in medical education on outpatient referrals.内科住院医师发现门诊转诊医学教育方面存在的差距。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jul 30;20(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02177-3.
9
Surgeon and hospital volume outcomes in bariatric surgery: a population-level study.外科医生和医院数量对减重手术结果的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 May;16(5):674-681. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.01.012. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
10
Association of Discretionary Hospital Volume Standards for High-risk Cancer Surgery With Patient Outcomes and Access, 2005-2016.2005-2016 年,高危癌症手术医院容量标准的酌处权与患者结局和可及性的关系。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Nov 1;154(11):1005-1012. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.3017.