Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, PB 4014 Ulleval Stadion, 0806 Oslo, Norway.
J Biomech. 2012 Feb 23;45(4):666-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.12.011. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
Analyses of joint moments are important in the study of human motion, and are crucial for our understanding of e.g. how and why ACL injuries occur. Such analyses may be affected by artifacts due to inconsistencies in the equations of motion when force and movement data are filtered with different cut-off frequencies. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of these artifacts, and compare joint moments calculated with the same or different cut-off frequency for the filtering of force and movement data. 123 elite handball players performed sidestep cutting while the movement was recorded by eight 240 Hz cameras and the ground reaction forces were recorded by a 960 Hz force plate. Knee and hip joint moments were calculated through inverse dynamics, with four different combinations of cut-off frequencies for signal filtering: movement 10 Hz, force 10 Hz, (10-10); movement 15 Hz, force 15 Hz; movement 10 Hz, force 50 Hz (10-50); movement 15 Hz, force 50 Hz. The results revealed significant differences, especially between conditions with different filtering of force and movement. Mean (SD) peak knee abduction moment for the 10-10 and 10-50 condition were 1.27 (0.53) and 1.64 (0.68) Nm/kg, respectively. Ranking of players based on knee abduction moments were affected by filtering condition. Out of 20 players with peak knee abduction moment higher than mean+1S D with the 10-50 condition, only 11 were still above mean+1 SD when the 10-10 condition was applied. Hip moments were very sensitive to filtering cut-off. Mean (SD) peak hip flexion moment was 3.64 (0.75) and 5.92 (1.80) under the 10-10 and 10-50 conditions, respectively. Based on these findings, force and movement data should be processed with the same filter. Conclusions from previous inverse dynamics studies, where this was not the case, should be treated with caution.
关节力矩分析在人类运动研究中很重要,对于理解 ACL 损伤的发生机制和原因至关重要。当使用不同的截止频率对力和运动数据进行滤波时,由于运动方程的不一致,可能会出现分析伪迹。本研究的目的是量化这些伪迹的影响,并比较使用相同或不同截止频率滤波力和运动数据计算得到的关节力矩。123 名精英手球运动员进行侧步切入时,运动由 8 个 240Hz 摄像机记录,地面反作用力由 960Hz 力板记录。通过逆动力学计算膝关节和髋关节力矩,信号滤波有 4 种不同的截止频率组合:运动 10Hz,力 10Hz(10-10);运动 15Hz,力 15Hz;运动 10Hz,力 50Hz(10-50);运动 15Hz,力 50Hz。结果显示,尤其是在力和运动滤波不同的情况下,存在显著差异。10-10 和 10-50 条件下的膝关节外展峰值力矩均值(标准差)分别为 1.27(0.53)和 1.64(0.68)Nm/kg。基于膝关节外展力矩对运动员进行排名时,会受到滤波条件的影响。在 20 名膝关节外展峰值力矩高于 10-50 条件下均值+1SD 的运动员中,当应用 10-10 条件时,只有 11 名运动员仍高于均值+1SD。髋关节力矩对滤波截止高度敏感。10-10 和 10-50 条件下的髋关节峰值屈曲力矩均值(标准差)分别为 3.64(0.75)和 5.92(1.80)。基于这些发现,力和运动数据应使用相同的滤波器进行处理。在未采用相同滤波器的情况下,之前的逆动力学研究的结论应谨慎对待。