Chalmers Robin L, Keay Lisa, McNally John, Kern Jami
George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Optom Vis Sci. 2012 Mar;89(3):316-25. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318240c7ff.
To evaluate the association of symptomatic soft contact lens (SCL)-related corneal infiltrative events (CIEs) with SCL material, lens care products (LCPs), and other risk factors.
Cases with symptomatic CIEs were identified in a retrospective, multicenter case-control study at five academic eye care centers. Each case was matched to three controls each who had received eye care near the time of the case's last full examination at that center but were not matched for demographic or other factors. Infiltrate status was established by an expert panel who were masked to sponsor, SCL, and LCP brand. Stratified analyses were conducted removing all daily disposable (DD) and all extended wear (EW) cases.
Clinical records from 166 patients with symptomatic CIEs and known EW status were included. Cases used >50 SCL brands and >10 LCP brands. Increased risk in univariate analysis for LCP was not significant after adjustment for other factors. In the multivariate analysis of all cases, use of reusable SCLs (4.03×; 95% C.I. 1.12 to 14.67) and EW (3.98×; 2.32 to 6.84) increased risk and patient age (per year older) was protective (0.96×; 0.94 to 0.98). Among daily wear cases (n = 102 cases), use of reusable SCLs (12.46×; 1.54 to 100.62) and silicone hydrogel (SiHy) (1.99×; 1.06 to 3.75) and age (0.95×: 0.92 to 0.97) were associated. Without DD cases (n = 162), EW (4.42×; 2.53 to 7.70), SiHy use (1.84×; 1.03 to 3.29), and patient age (0.96× 0.94 to 0.98) were significant factors. No specific SCL or LCP brands were associated with increased risk.
In this community-based trial, younger patients were at increased risk of infiltrative events. DD lenses were protective relative to reusable lenses. Overnight use increased risk in all analyses and silicone hydrogels increased risk in daily wearers, regardless of LCP brand. Improvements in lens storage case hygiene and environment may be a mechanism for reducing risk of CIEs related to SCL use.
评估有症状的软性接触镜(SCL)相关角膜浸润事件(CIE)与SCL材料、镜片护理产品(LCP)及其他危险因素之间的关联。
在五家学术性眼科护理中心进行的一项回顾性多中心病例对照研究中,确定有症状的CIE病例。每个病例与三名对照匹配,这些对照在该中心病例最后一次全面检查时附近接受过眼科护理,但在人口统计学或其他因素方面未进行匹配。由一个对赞助商、SCL和LCP品牌不知情的专家小组确定浸润状态。进行分层分析,排除所有日抛型(DD)和所有长戴型(EW)病例。
纳入了166例有症状的CIE且已知EW状态的患者的临床记录。病例使用了超过50种SCL品牌和超过10种LCP品牌。在对其他因素进行调整后,LCP在单因素分析中的风险增加并不显著。在所有病例的多因素分析中,使用可重复使用的SCL(4.03倍;95%置信区间1.12至14.67)和EW(3.98倍;2.32至6.84)会增加风险,而患者年龄(每增加一岁)具有保护作用(0.96倍;0.94至0.98)。在日戴型病例(n = 102例)中,使用可重复使用的SCL(12.46倍;1.54至100.62)、硅水凝胶(SiHy)(1.99倍;1.06至3.75)与年龄(0.95倍:0.92至0.97)有关联。在排除DD病例(n = 162)后,EW(4.42倍;2.53至7.70)、使用SiHy(1.84倍;1.03至3.29)和患者年龄(0.96倍,0.94至0.98)是显著因素。没有特定的SCL或LCP品牌与风险增加相关。
在这项基于社区的试验中,年轻患者发生浸润事件的风险增加。日抛型镜片相对于可重复使用的镜片具有保护作用。在所有分析中,过夜佩戴会增加风险,硅水凝胶在日戴者中会增加风险,与LCP品牌无关。改善镜片储存盒的卫生状况和环境可能是降低与SCL使用相关的CIE风险的一种机制。