• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家长对儿科遗传学研究的看法以及对基因型驱动研究招募的影响。

Parent perspectives on pediatric genetic research and implications for genotype-driven research recruitment.

作者信息

Tabor Holly K, Brazg Tracy, Crouch Julia, Namey Emily E, Fullerton Stephanie M, Beskow Laura M, Wilfond Benjamin S

机构信息

Seattle Children's Research Institute University of Washington, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, 1900 Ninth Ave., Seattle, WA 98101, USA.

出版信息

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Dec;6(4):41-52. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.41.

DOI:10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.41
PMID:22228059
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3426316/
Abstract

As genetic research is increasingly conducted in children, it is important to understand how parents make decisions about enrolling their children and what they think about receiving their children's genetic research results. We conducted semi-structured phone interviews with 23 parents of children enrolled in genetic studies of autism or diabetes. Qualitative thematic analysis focused on two important components of genetic research and genotype-driven recruitment: participation in genetic research and return of results. Our findings suggest that parents' preferences and perspectives may be specific to their child's disease and the needs of the family as a whole. Assessing the expectations of target research populations will be beneficial for developing best practices for pediatric genetic research, return of results, and genotype-driven recruitment.

摘要

随着针对儿童的基因研究越来越多,了解父母如何决定让孩子参与研究以及他们对获取孩子的基因研究结果有何看法变得很重要。我们对23位让孩子参与自闭症或糖尿病基因研究的家长进行了半结构化电话访谈。定性主题分析聚焦于基因研究和基因型驱动招募的两个重要组成部分:参与基因研究和结果反馈。我们的研究结果表明,父母的偏好和观点可能因孩子的疾病以及整个家庭的需求而异。评估目标研究人群的期望将有助于制定儿科基因研究、结果反馈和基因型驱动招募的最佳实践。

相似文献

1
Parent perspectives on pediatric genetic research and implications for genotype-driven research recruitment.家长对儿科遗传学研究的看法以及对基因型驱动研究招募的影响。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Dec;6(4):41-52. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.41.
2
Research participants' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.研究参与者对基因型驱动的研究招募的看法。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Dec;6(4):3-20. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.3.
3
IRB chairs' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.机构审查委员会主席对基因型驱动的研究招募的看法。
IRB. 2012 May-Jun;34(3):1-10.
4
Informed consent for enrolling minors in genetic susceptibility research: a qualitative study of at-risk children's and parents' views about children's role in decision-making.关于招募未成年人参与基因易感性研究的知情同意:对高危儿童及其父母关于儿童在决策中作用的观点的定性研究
J Adolesc Health. 2003 Apr;32(4):260-71. doi: 10.1016/s1054-139x(02)00459-7.
5
An exploration of Singaporean parental experiences in managing school-aged children's postoperative pain: a descriptive qualitative approach.新加坡父母管理学龄期儿童术后疼痛的经验探索:描述性定性方法。
J Clin Nurs. 2012 Mar;21(5-6):860-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03911.x. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
6
The meaning of genetic research results: reflections from individuals with and without a known genetic disorder.基因研究结果的意义:来自有和没有已知遗传疾病个体的思考
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Dec;6(4):30-40. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.30.
7
Parents' perspectives on having their children interviewed for research.父母对于让孩子接受研究访谈的看法。
Res Nurs Health. 2008 Feb;31(1):4-11. doi: 10.1002/nur.20231.
8
The beliefs, motivations, and expectations of parents who have enrolled their children in a genetic biorepository.参与遗传生物库的家长的信念、动机和期望。
Genet Med. 2012 Mar;14(3):330-7. doi: 10.1038/gim.2011.25. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
9
Attitudes of stakeholders in psychiatry towards the inclusion of children in genomic research.精神科利益相关者对将儿童纳入基因组研究的态度。
Hum Genomics. 2018 Mar 5;12(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s40246-018-0144-8.
10
Bereaved parents' experiences of research participation.丧亲父母的研究参与体验。
BMC Palliat Care. 2018 Nov 7;17(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0375-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Ambiguities faced by parents who received a genetic diagnosis for autistic offspring with intellectual disabilities.那些为患有智力障碍的自闭症后代接受基因诊断的父母所面临的种种不确定性。
J Community Genet. 2025 Sep 5. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00817-z.
2
Systematic Review: The Psychosocial Impacts of Autism-Related Genetic Testing.系统评价:自闭症相关基因检测的心理社会影响
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2025.06.024.
3
Contributing to an autism biobank: Diverse perspectives from autistic participants, family members and researchers.为自闭症生物库做贡献:自闭症患者、家庭成员和研究人员的不同视角。
Autism. 2024 Jul;28(7):1719-1731. doi: 10.1177/13623613231203938. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
4
Parents' attitudes towards research involving genome sequencing of their healthy children: a qualitative study.父母对涉及健康子女基因组测序研究的态度:一项定性研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Feb;32(2):171-175. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01476-9. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
5
Receiving de novo genetic diagnoses for autism with intellectual disability: parents' views of impacts on families' reproductive decisions.获得针对伴有智力障碍的自闭症的新发基因诊断:父母对其对家庭生育决策影响的看法。
J Community Genet. 2024 Feb;15(1):85-96. doi: 10.1007/s12687-023-00679-3. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
6
Genotype first: Clinical genomics research through a reverse phenotyping approach.先基因型,后表型:通过反向表型方法进行临床基因组学研究。
Am J Hum Genet. 2023 Jan 5;110(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.12.004.
7
Participant perspective on the recall-by-genotype research approach: a mixed-method embedded study with participants of the CHRIS study.参与者对基于基因型召回研究方法的看法:一项采用 CHRIS 研究参与者的混合方法嵌入式研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Nov;31(11):1218-1227. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01277-6. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
8
Ethical, legal and social/societal implications (ELSI) of recall-by-genotype (RbG) and genotype-driven-research (GDR) approaches: a scoping review.基于基因型召回(RbG)和基因型驱动研究(GDR)方法的伦理、法律及社会/社会影响(ELSI):一项范围综述
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Sep;30(9):1000-1010. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01120-y. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
9
Perspectives and preferences regarding genomic secondary findings in underrepresented prenatal and pediatric populations: A mixed-methods approach.针对代表性不足的产前和儿科人群中的基因组次要发现的观点和偏好:一种混合方法。
Genet Med. 2022 Jun;24(6):1206-1216. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.02.004. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
10
Balancing scientific interests and the rights of participants in designing a recall by genotype study.在设计基于基因型的召回研究时,平衡科学利益和参与者的权利。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 Jul;29(7):1146-1157. doi: 10.1038/s41431-021-00860-7. Epub 2021 May 13.

本文引用的文献

1
The meaning of genetic research results: reflections from individuals with and without a known genetic disorder.基因研究结果的意义:来自有和没有已知遗传疾病个体的思考
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Dec;6(4):30-40. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.30.
2
Epilepsy patient-participants and genetic research results as "answers".癫痫患者参与者以及作为“答案”的基因研究结果。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Dec;6(4):21-9. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.21.
3
Research participants' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.研究参与者对基因型驱动的研究招募的看法。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Dec;6(4):3-20. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.3.
4
Biobanking in pediatrics: the human nonsubjects approach.儿科生物样本库:人类非受试者方法。
Per Med. 2011 Jan;8(1):79. doi: 10.2217/pme.10.70.
5
Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group.向研究参与者报告基因研究结果的伦理与实践指南:美国国立心肺血液研究所工作组的更新指南
Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010 Dec;3(6):574-80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.110.958827.
6
Human tissue samples for research. A focus group study in adults and teenagers in Flanders.用于研究的人体组织样本。比利时弗拉芒地区成年人和青少年的焦点小组研究。
Genet Couns. 2010;21(2):157-68.
7
Ethical challenges in genotype-driven research recruitment.基因型驱动的研究招募中的伦理挑战。
Genome Res. 2010 Jun;20(6):705-9. doi: 10.1101/gr.104455.109. Epub 2010 Apr 23.
8
The storage and use of biological tissue samples from minors for research: a focus group study.未成年人生物组织样本用于研究的储存与使用:一项焦点小组研究。
Public Health Genomics. 2011;14(2):68-76. doi: 10.1159/000294185. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
9
What is a meaningful result? Disclosing the results of genomic research in autism to research participants.什么是有意义的结果?向研究参与者披露自闭症基因组研究的结果。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2010 Aug;18(8):867-71. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.34. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
10
Biobanks: oversight offers protection.生物样本库:监督提供保护。
Science. 2009 Nov 6;326(5954):798-9; author reply 799. doi: 10.1126/science.326_798c.