• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癫痫患者参与者以及作为“答案”的基因研究结果。

Epilepsy patient-participants and genetic research results as "answers".

作者信息

Namey Emily E, Beskow Laura M

机构信息

Duke Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USa. enamey@ gmail.com

出版信息

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Dec;6(4):21-9. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.21.

DOI:10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.21
PMID:22228057
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3399113/
Abstract

Better understanding of how research participants with a known condition ascribe meaning to individual genetic results is important to help researchers and institutional review boards evaluate the potential benefits and harms of disclosing results in the context of genotype-driven research recruitment. Based on 29 in-depth interviews with epilepsy patients participating in a genetic study, we found that this population of research subjects anticipated that genetic research results would provide answers to a range of questions about the research process and their condition. Their multi-layered interpretations underscore the need for clear communication about the nature and limitations of results if individual or aggregate genetic results are returned in the process of recruitment for additional research.

摘要

更好地理解患有已知疾病的研究参与者如何赋予个体基因结果以意义,对于帮助研究人员和机构审查委员会评估在基因型驱动的研究招募背景下披露结果的潜在益处和危害至关重要。基于对参与一项基因研究的癫痫患者进行的29次深入访谈,我们发现这群研究对象预计基因研究结果将为一系列有关研究过程及其病情的问题提供答案。他们的多层次解读强调,如果在招募更多研究对象的过程中返回个体或汇总的基因结果,就需要就结果的性质和局限性进行清晰的沟通。

相似文献

1
Epilepsy patient-participants and genetic research results as "answers".癫痫患者参与者以及作为“答案”的基因研究结果。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Dec;6(4):21-9. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.21.
2
The meaning of genetic research results: reflections from individuals with and without a known genetic disorder.基因研究结果的意义:来自有和没有已知遗传疾病个体的思考
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Dec;6(4):30-40. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.30.
3
Informed consent and genomic incidental findings: IRB chair perspectives.知情同意与基因组偶然发现:机构审查委员会主席的观点
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Dec;6(4):53-67. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.53.
4
Questions, complexities, and limitations in disclosing individual genetic results.披露个体基因检测结果中的问题、复杂性和局限性。
Am J Bioeth. 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6):34-6; author reply W10-2. doi: 10.1080/15265160600936058.
5
Incidental findings in genetics research using archived DNA.利用存档DNA进行遗传学研究时的偶然发现。
J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):286-91, 212. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00271.x.
6
IRB chairs' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.机构审查委员会主席对基因型驱动的研究招募的看法。
IRB. 2012 May-Jun;34(3):1-10.
7
Informed Consent and the Disclosure of Clinical Results to Research Participants.知情同意与向研究参与者披露临床结果
Am J Bioeth. 2017 Jul;17(7):58-60. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1328532.
8
Participants' recall and understanding of genomic research and large-scale data sharing.参与者对基因组研究和大规模数据共享的回忆与理解。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Oct;8(4):42-52. doi: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.4.42.
9
Research participants' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.研究参与者对基因型驱动的研究招募的看法。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Dec;6(4):3-20. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.3.
10
Should third party consent to research be mandated? Should there be a right for third parties to have data about them withdrawn from a research project? Two perspectives.是否应该强制要求第三方同意参与研究?第三方是否有权要求从研究项目中撤回关于他们的数据?两种观点。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2004 Jan;23(1):S75-86. doi: 10.1007/BF03351408.

引用本文的文献

1
Participant perspective on the recall-by-genotype research approach: a mixed-method embedded study with participants of the CHRIS study.参与者对基于基因型召回研究方法的看法:一项采用 CHRIS 研究参与者的混合方法嵌入式研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Nov;31(11):1218-1227. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01277-6. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
2
Ethical, legal and social/societal implications (ELSI) of recall-by-genotype (RbG) and genotype-driven-research (GDR) approaches: a scoping review.基于基因型召回(RbG)和基因型驱动研究(GDR)方法的伦理、法律及社会/社会影响(ELSI):一项范围综述
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Sep;30(9):1000-1010. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01120-y. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
3
Balancing scientific interests and the rights of participants in designing a recall by genotype study.在设计基于基因型的召回研究时,平衡科学利益和参与者的权利。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 Jul;29(7):1146-1157. doi: 10.1038/s41431-021-00860-7. Epub 2021 May 13.
4
Genetic testing preferences in families containing multiple individuals with epilepsy.遗传性癫痫患者家庭的基因检测偏好。
Epilepsia. 2014 Nov;55(11):1705-13. doi: 10.1111/epi.12810. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
5
Genotype-driven recruitment: a strategy whose time has come?基于基因型的招募:是时候采用这种策略了吗?
BMC Med Genomics. 2013 May 23;6:19. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-6-19.
6
'Information is information': a public perspective on incidental findings in clinical and research genome-based testing.“信息就是信息”:公众对临床和研究中基于基因组检测的偶然发现的看法。
Clin Genet. 2013 Jul;84(1):11-8. doi: 10.1111/cge.12167. Epub 2013 May 3.
7
Am I a control?: Genotype-driven research recruitment and self-understandings of study participants.我是一个对照样本吗?:基于基因型的研究招募和研究参与者的自我理解。
Genet Med. 2012 Dec;14(12):983-9. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.88. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
8
Recommendations for ethical approaches to genotype-driven research recruitment.基因型驱动研究招募的伦理方法建议。
Hum Genet. 2012 Sep;131(9):1423-31. doi: 10.1007/s00439-012-1177-z. Epub 2012 May 24.
9
Parent perspectives on pediatric genetic research and implications for genotype-driven research recruitment.家长对儿科遗传学研究的看法以及对基因型驱动研究招募的影响。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Dec;6(4):41-52. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.41.
10
The meaning of genetic research results: reflections from individuals with and without a known genetic disorder.基因研究结果的意义:来自有和没有已知遗传疾病个体的思考
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Dec;6(4):30-40. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.30.

本文引用的文献

1
Parent perspectives on pediatric genetic research and implications for genotype-driven research recruitment.家长对儿科遗传学研究的看法以及对基因型驱动研究招募的影响。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Dec;6(4):41-52. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.41.
2
The meaning of genetic research results: reflections from individuals with and without a known genetic disorder.基因研究结果的意义:来自有和没有已知遗传疾病个体的思考
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Dec;6(4):30-40. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.30.
3
Research participants' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment.研究参与者对基因型驱动的研究招募的看法。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Dec;6(4):3-20. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.3.
4
Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered.向研究参与者披露个体基因数据:重新审议该争议。
Trends Genet. 2011 Feb;27(2):41-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2010.11.004. Epub 2010 Dec 27.
5
Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group.向研究参与者报告基因研究结果的伦理与实践指南:美国国立心肺血液研究所工作组的更新指南
Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010 Dec;3(6):574-80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.110.958827.
6
Offering individual genetic research results: context matters.提供个体基因研究结果:背景很重要。
Sci Transl Med. 2010 Jun 30;2(38):38cm20. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000952.
7
Ethical challenges in genotype-driven research recruitment.基因型驱动的研究招募中的伦理挑战。
Genome Res. 2010 Jun;20(6):705-9. doi: 10.1101/gr.104455.109. Epub 2010 Apr 23.
8
Prospective biorepository participants' perspectives on access to research results.前瞻性生物样本库参与者对获取研究结果的看法。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2009 Sep;4(3):99-111. doi: 10.1525/jer.2009.4.3.99.
9
Disclosure of research results from cancer genomic studies: state of the science.癌症基因组研究成果的披露:科学现状
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Jul 1;15(13):4270-6. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-3067. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
10
Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.公众对大型队列基因研究结果反馈的期望。
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Nov;8(11):36-43. doi: 10.1080/15265160802513093.