Thoracic Surgery Department, United Hospitals of Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Apr;41(4):831-3. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr056. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
Digitalized chest drainage systems allow for quantification of air leak and measurement of intrapleural pressure. Little is known about the value of intrapleural pressure during the postoperative phase and its role in the recovering process after pulmonary resection. The objective of this investigation was to measure the values of pleural pressure immediately before the removal of chest tube after different types of pulmonary lobectomy.
Prospective observational analysis on 203 consecutive patients submitted to pulmonary lobectomy during a 12-month period at two centres. Multiple measurements were recorded in the last hour before the removal of chest tube and averaged for the analysis. All patients were seated in bed in a 45° up-right position or in a chair, had a single chest tube and were not connected to suction during the evaluation period. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the differences in pleural pressure between different types of lobectomies.
The average maximum, minimum and differential pressures were -6.1, -19.5 and 13.3 cmH(2)O, respectively. The average pressures were similar in all types of lobectomies (ANOVA, P = 0.2) and ranged from -11 to -13 cmH(2)O, with the exception of right upper bilobectomy (-20 cmH(2)O, all P-values vs. other types of lobectomies <0.05). Similar values were also recorded for maximum pressures (range -4.4 to -8.4 cmH(2)O) and minimum pressures (-31.6 cmH(2)O vs. ranged from -15.4 to -20.5 cmH(2)O, all P-values <0.01). The average pleural pressure was not associated with FEV1 (P = 0.9), DLCO (P = 0.2) or FEV1/FVC ratio (P = 0.6), when tested with linear regression. Similarly, the average pleural pressure was similar in patients with and without COPD (-12.1 vs. -13.0 cmH(2)O, P = 0.4). The ANOVA test was used to assess differences in pressures between different lobectomies.
The so-called water seal status may actually correspond to intrapleural pressures ranging from -13 to -20 cmH(2)O. Modern electronic chest drainage devices allow a stable control of the intrapleural pressure. Thus, the values found in this study may be used as target pressures for different types of lobectomies, in order to favour lung recovery after surgery.
数字化胸腔引流系统可用于量化漏气量和测量胸腔内压力。术后阶段胸腔内压力的价值及其在肺切除术后恢复过程中的作用知之甚少。本研究的目的是测量两种中心在 12 个月期间接受肺叶切除术后不同类型肺叶切除术前移除胸腔引流管前胸膜压力的值。
对 203 例连续患者进行前瞻性观察分析,在两个中心接受肺叶切除术。在移除胸腔引流管前的最后 1 小时内记录多次测量值,并进行平均值分析。所有患者均在 45°仰卧位或椅子上,单根胸腔引流管,评估期间未连接负压吸引。使用方差分析(ANOVA)评估不同类型肺叶切除术后胸膜压力的差异。
平均最大、最小和压差分别为-6.1、-19.5 和 13.3 cmH2O。各种类型的肺叶切除术后平均压力相似(ANOVA,P=0.2),范围为-11 至-13 cmH2O,除右上肺叶切除术后为-20 cmH2O(所有与其他类型肺叶切除术的 P 值均<0.05)。最大压力(范围为-4.4 至-8.4 cmH2O)和最小压力(-31.6 cmH2O 与范围为-15.4 至-20.5 cmH2O,所有 P 值均<0.01)也记录了相似的值。线性回归分析显示,平均胸膜压力与 FEV1(P=0.9)、DLCO(P=0.2)或 FEV1/FVC 比值(P=0.6)无关。同样,在 COPD 患者和非 COPD 患者中,平均胸膜压力相似(-12.1 与-13.0 cmH2O,P=0.4)。使用方差分析评估不同肺叶切除术后压力的差异。
所谓的水封状态实际上可能对应于胸腔内压力范围为-13 至-20 cmH2O。现代电子胸腔引流装置可稳定控制胸腔内压力。因此,本研究中的值可以用作不同类型肺叶切除术的目标压力,以促进术后肺的恢复。