Suppr超能文献

非气管插管胸腔镜手术中的辅助经胸负压通气

Adjuvant Transthoracic Negative-Pressure Ventilation in Nonintubated Thoracoscopic Surgery.

作者信息

Taje Riccardo, Fabbi Eleonora, Sorge Roberto, Elia Stefano, Dauri Mario, Pompeo Eugenio

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, V.le Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy.

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Policlinico Tor Vergata University, V.le Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 23;12(13):4234. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134234.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To minimize the risks of barotrauma during nonintubated thoracoscopic-surgery under spontaneous ventilation, we investigated an adjuvant transthoracic negative-pressure ventilation (NPV) method in patients operated on due to severe emphysema or interstitial lung disease.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, NPV was employed for temporary low oxygen saturation and to achieve end-operative lung re-expansion during nonintubated lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for severe emphysema (30 patients, LVRS group) and in the nonintubated wedge resection of undetermined interstitial lung disease (30 patients, wedge-group). The results were compared following 1:1 propensity score matching with equivalent control groups undergoing the same procedures under spontaneous ventilation, with adjuvant positive-pressure ventilation (PPV) performed on-demand through the laryngeal mask. The primary outcomes were changes (preoperative-postoperative value) in the arterial oxygen tension/fraction of the inspired oxygen ratio (ΔPO/FiO;) and ΔPaCO, and lung expansion completeness on a 24 h postoperative chest radiograph (CXR-score, 2: full or 1: incomplete).

RESULTS

Intergroup comparisons (NPV vs. PPV) showed no differences in demographic and pulmonary function. NPV could be accomplished in all instances with no conversion to general anesthesia with intubation. In the LVRS group, NPV improved ΔPO/FiO (9.3 ± 16 vs. 25.3 ± 30.5, = 0.027) and ΔPaCO (-2.2 ± 3.15 mmHg vs. 0.03 ± 0.18 mmHg, = 0.008) with no difference in the CXR score, whereas in the wedge group, both ΔPO/FiO (3.1 ± 8.2 vs. 9.9 ± 13.8, = 0.035) and the CXR score (1.9 ± 0.3 vs. 1.6 ± 0.5, = 0.04) were better in the NPV subgroup. There was no mortality and no intergroup difference in morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, NITS with adjuvant transthoracic NPV resulted in better 24 h oxygenation measures than PPV in both the LVRS and wedge groups, and in better lung expansion according to the CXR score in the wedge group.

摘要

背景

为了将自主通气下非插管胸腔镜手术期间气压伤的风险降至最低,我们研究了一种辅助性经胸负压通气(NPV)方法,用于因严重肺气肿或间质性肺疾病而接受手术的患者。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,NPV用于严重肺气肿患者非插管肺减容手术(LVRS,30例患者,LVRS组)及未明确诊断的间质性肺疾病患者非插管楔形切除术(30例患者,楔形组)期间,以应对临时低氧饱和度情况,并实现手术结束时肺复张。将结果与按1:1倾向评分匹配的等效对照组进行比较,对照组在自主通气下接受相同手术,并通过喉罩按需进行辅助正压通气(PPV)。主要结局指标为动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数比值(ΔPO/FiO₂)和ΔPaCO₂的变化(术前-术后值),以及术后24小时胸部X线片上的肺扩张完整性(CXR评分,2分表示完全扩张;1分表示不完全扩张)。

结果

组间比较(NPV组与PPV组)显示,两组在人口统计学和肺功能方面无差异。所有情况下均能完成NPV,无需转为插管全身麻醉。在LVRS组,NPV改善了ΔPO/FiO₂(9.3±16 vs. 25.3±30.5,P = 0.027)和ΔPaCO₂(-2.2±3.15 mmHg vs. 0.03±0.18 mmHg,P = 0.008),CXR评分无差异;而在楔形组,NPV亚组的ΔPO/FiO₂(3.1±8.2 vs. 9.9±13.8,P = 0.035)和CXR评分(1.9±0.3 vs. 1.6±0.5,P = 0.04)均更好。两组均无死亡病例,发病率也无组间差异。

结论

在这项回顾性研究中,辅助经胸NPV的非插管胸腔镜手术在LVRS组和楔形组中均比PPV产生了更好的24小时氧合指标,且根据楔形组的CXR评分,肺扩张情况更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb4f/10342242/2748e79f1c5a/jcm-12-04234-g0A1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验