Yarborough Bobbi Jo H, Janoff Shannon L, Stevens Victor J, Kohler David, Green Carla A
Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR.
Transl Behav Med. 2011 Sep 1;1(3):406-415. doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0056-9.
Most weight loss interventions for obesity-related risks exclude people with serious mental health conditions. PURPOSE: To adapt a successful lifestyle/weight loss intervention for this population, deliver it in an HMO and two public mental health clinics, and concurrently measure implementation factors. METHODS: Developmental and implementation-focused formative evaluations guided adaptations and identified barriers/facilitators to successful program deployment. RESULTS: Adaptations included content specific to the population's needs, consciousness-raising among clinicians and patients, additional case-management, and greater program flexibility. Barriers included instability in both settings from different sources. Facilitators included familiarity with groups, manual integrity, and appreciation of the program. It was delivered consistently across settings with maximum exposure and fairly good fidelity to the protocol (mean rating=1.7, 2.0=complete fidelity). CONCLUSIONS: This mixed-method implementation evaluation demonstrated that lifestyle/weight loss interventions in mental health settings are complex, but feasible, and valued by participants. Main program outcomes will be reported at the trial's conclusion.
大多数针对肥胖相关风险的减肥干预措施将患有严重心理健康问题的人群排除在外。目的:为这一人群调整一种成功的生活方式/减肥干预措施,在健康维护组织(HMO)和两家公共心理健康诊所实施,并同时测量实施因素。方法:以发展和实施为重点的形成性评估指导了调整工作,并确定了成功开展项目的障碍/促进因素。结果:调整内容包括针对该人群需求的特定内容、提高临床医生和患者的意识、额外的病例管理以及更大的项目灵活性。障碍包括来自不同来源的两种环境的不稳定性。促进因素包括对小组的熟悉程度、手册的完整性以及对该项目的认可。该项目在不同环境中得到了一致实施,最大限度地进行了推广,并且对方案的忠诚度相当高(平均评分为1.7,2.0表示完全忠诚)。结论:这种混合方法实施评估表明,心理健康环境中的生活方式/减肥干预措施虽然复杂,但可行,且受到参与者的重视。主要项目成果将在试验结束时报告。