• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动脉血压听诊测量的可靠性。标准方法与新方法的比较。

The reliability of auscultatory measurement of arterial blood pressure. A comparison of the standard and a new methodology.

作者信息

Stolt M, Sjönell G, Aström H, Hansson L

机构信息

Department of Development of Primary Health Care, Stockholm County Council West, Sweden.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 1990 Sep;3(9):697-703. doi: 10.1093/ajh/3.9.697.

DOI:10.1093/ajh/3.9.697
PMID:2222978
Abstract

In 48 individuals with a wide range of arm circumferences blood pressure measured indirectly with two different cuffs was compared to direct intraarterial measurements. The two cuffs were a standard size cuff (12 X 35 cm) and a newly developed cuff, containing three rubber bags of different sizes, which automatically selects the appropriately sized bag in relation to arm circumference (Tricuff, Pressure Group AB, Sweden). The Tricuff correctly placed 42 of the 43 patients in the "normotensive" range, ie, diastolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg, whereas the standard cuff put only 33 of 44 patients in this range (P less than .005). The discrepancy was not only due to the expected better performance in patients with obese arms, but also in the subgroup of patients with arms in the range 22 to 31 cm, in which group both cuffs would measure blood pressure with a 12 cm wide rubber bag. The number of correctly identified "normotensive" patients was noticeably higher with the Tricuff than with the standard cuff (30/31 v 25/32, P = .053). The better specificity of the new cuff thus offers an improvement over the standard cuff. There are several potential clinical advantages of this, mainly that the risk of erroneously labelling normotensive individuals as hypertensive is reduced.

摘要

在48名臂围范围广泛的个体中,将使用两种不同袖带间接测量的血压与直接动脉内测量的血压进行了比较。这两种袖带分别是标准尺寸袖带(12×35厘米)和新开发的袖带,后者包含三个不同尺寸的橡胶袋,可根据臂围自动选择尺寸合适的袋子(Tricuff,瑞典压力集团AB公司)。Tricuff将43名患者中的42名正确归类到“血压正常”范围,即舒张压低于90毫米汞柱,而标准袖带仅将44名患者中的33名归为此范围(P<0.005)。这种差异不仅是由于肥胖手臂患者预期表现更好,在臂围22至31厘米的患者亚组中也是如此,在该亚组中两种袖带均使用12厘米宽的橡胶袋测量血压。Tricuff正确识别出的“血压正常”患者数量明显高于标准袖带(30/31对25/32,P = 0.053)。因此,新袖带具有更好的特异性,相比标准袖带有所改进。这具有几个潜在的临床优势,主要是降低了将血压正常个体错误标记为高血压患者的风险。

相似文献

1
The reliability of auscultatory measurement of arterial blood pressure. A comparison of the standard and a new methodology.动脉血压听诊测量的可靠性。标准方法与新方法的比较。
Am J Hypertens. 1990 Sep;3(9):697-703. doi: 10.1093/ajh/3.9.697.
2
Improved accuracy of indirect blood pressure measurement in patients with obese arms.肥胖手臂患者间接血压测量准确性的提高
Am J Hypertens. 1993 Jan;6(1):66-71. doi: 10.1093/ajh/6.1.66.
3
[Blood pressure measurements using three different cuff sizes].[使用三种不同袖带尺寸测量血压]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1998 Aug 30;118(20):3112-5.
4
Accuracy of auscultatory blood pressure measurement with a long cuff.使用长袖带测量听诊血压的准确性。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Aug 8;295(6594):354-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.295.6594.354.
5
[Evaluation of a new blood pressure cuff for patients with large and normal arm circumferences].[一种适用于上臂围较大和正常的患者的新型血压袖带的评估]
S Afr Med J. 1987 Nov 7;72(9):610-1.
6
Accuracy of auscultatory blood pressure measurements in hypertensive and obese subjects.高血压和肥胖受试者听诊法测量血压的准确性。
Hypertension. 1983 Jan-Feb;5(1):122-7. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.5.1.122.
7
Systematic difference between blood pressure readings caused by cuff type.
Hypertension. 1994 Dec;24(6):786-92. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.24.6.786.
8
Factors affecting the validity of the standard blood pressure cuff.影响标准血压袖带有效性的因素。
Clin Physiol. 1993 Nov;13(6):611-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097x.1993.tb00476.x.
9
One size does not fit all: universal cuff overestimates oscillometric blood pressure in persons with large arm circumference.一刀切并不适合所有人:大臂围的人使用通用袖带会高估示波法血压。
Blood Press. 2024 Dec;33(1):2338208. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2024.2338208. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
10
Comparison of the conical cuff and the standard rectangular cuffs.锥形袖带与标准矩形袖带的比较。
Int J Epidemiol. 1985 Sep;14(3):468-72. doi: 10.1093/ije/14.3.468.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiological and clinical implications of blood pressure measured in seated versus supine position.坐位与仰卧位测量血压的流行病学及临床意义
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(31):e11603. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011603.
2
Which cuff should I use? Indirect blood pressure measurement for the diagnosis of hypertension in patients with obesity: a diagnostic accuracy review.我应该使用哪种袖带?肥胖患者高血压诊断中的间接血压测量:一项诊断准确性综述。
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 3;6(11):e012429. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012429.
3
Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension: rule of thirds in the Skaraborg project.
高血压的患病率、知晓率、治疗率和控制率:在 Skaraborg 项目中遵循三分法则。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2012 Jun;30(2):88-94. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2012.684207.