Suppr超能文献

房间隔峡部消融联合和不联合冠状窦临时点式阻断:急性结果的随机临床比较。

Mitral isthmus ablation with and without temporary spot occlusion of the coronary sinus: a randomized clinical comparison of acute outcomes.

机构信息

Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux II, Bordeaux, Pessac, France.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 May;23(5):489-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02248.x. Epub 2012 Jan 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and outcomes of mitral isthmus (MI) linear ablation with temporary spot occlusion of the coronary sinus (CS).

BACKGROUND

CS blood flow cools local tissue precluding transmurality and bidirectional block across MI lesion.

METHODS

In a randomized, controlled trial (CS-occlusion = 20, Control = 22), MI ablation was performed during continuous CS pacing to monitor the moment of block. CS was occluded at the ablation site using 1 cm spherical balloon, Swan-Ganz catheter with angiographic confirmation. Ablation was started at posterior mitral annulus and continued up to left inferior pulmonary vein (LIPV) ostium using an irrigated-tip catheter. If block was achieved, balloon was deflated and linear block confirmed. If not, additional ablation was performed epicardially (power ≤25 W). Ablation was abandoned after ∼30 minutes, if block was not achieved.

RESULTS

CS occlusion (mean duration -27 ± 9 minutes) was achieved in all cases. Complete MI block was achieved in 13/20 (65%) and 15/22 (68%) patients in the CS-occlusion and control arms, respectively, P = 0.76. Block was achieved with significantly small number (0.5 ± 0.8 vs 1.9 ± 1.1, P = 0.0008) and duration (1.2 ± 1.7 vs 4.2 ± 3.5 minutes, P = 0.009) of epicardial radiofrequency (RF) applications and significantly lower amount of epicardial energy (1.3 ± 2.4 vs 6.3 ± 5.7 kJ, P = 0.006) in the CS-occlusion versus control arm, respectively. There was no difference in total RF (22 ± 9 vs 23 ± 11 minutes, P = 0.76), procedural (36 ± 16 vs 39 ± 20 minutes, P = 0.57), and fluoroscopic (13 ± 7 vs 15 ± 10 minutes, P = 0.46) durations for MI ablation between the 2 arms. Clinically uneventful CS dissection occurred in 1 patient

CONCLUSIONS

Temporary spot occlusion of CS is safe and significantly reduces the requirement of epicardial ablation to achieve MI block. It does not improve overall procedural success rate and procedural duration. Tissue cooling by CS blood flow is just one of the several challenges in MI ablation.

摘要

目的

评估在冠状窦(CS)临时点闭塞的情况下进行二尖瓣峡部(MI)线性消融的安全性和结果。

背景

CS 血流可冷却局部组织,从而防止 MI 病变的透壁性和双向阻滞。

方法

在一项随机对照试验(CS 闭塞组=20 例,对照组=22 例)中,在持续 CS 起搏时进行 MI 消融,以监测阻滞的时刻。使用 1 厘米的球形球囊在消融部位闭塞 CS,使用 Swan-Ganz 导管进行血管造影确认。从后二尖瓣环开始进行消融,并使用灌流消融导管继续进行到左肺下静脉(LIPV)口。如果实现了阻滞,就将球囊放气并确认线性阻滞。如果没有,就在心外膜上进行额外的消融(功率≤25 W)。如果 30 分钟后仍未实现阻滞,则放弃消融。

结果

在所有病例中均实现了 CS 闭塞(平均持续时间为-27±9 分钟)。CS 闭塞组中有 13/20(65%)和对照组中有 15/22(68%)的患者实现了完全 MI 阻滞,两组之间无显著差异(P=0.76)。CS 闭塞组中,实现阻滞所需的电生理(RF)应用次数(0.5±0.8 次 vs 1.9±1.1 次,P=0.0008)和时间(1.2±1.7 分钟 vs 4.2±3.5 分钟,P=0.009)明显更少,并且心外膜能量消耗(1.3±2.4 焦耳 vs 6.3±5.7 焦耳,P=0.006)也明显更少。CS 闭塞组和对照组的 MI 消融总 RF 时间(22±9 分钟 vs 23±11 分钟,P=0.76)、程序时间(36±16 分钟 vs 39±20 分钟,P=0.57)和透视时间(13±7 分钟 vs 15±10 分钟,P=0.46)之间均无显著差异。

在 1 例患者中发生了无并发症的 CS 夹层。

结论

CS 的临时点闭塞是安全的,可显著减少实现 MI 阻滞所需的心外膜消融。它并没有提高整体手术成功率和手术时间。CS 血流的组织冷却只是 MI 消融的几个挑战之一。

相似文献

10
Simple and novel technique to confirm complete mitral isthmus block.一种简单新颖的技术,可确认完全二尖瓣峡部阻滞。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018 Oct;29(10):1379-1387. doi: 10.1111/jce.13700. Epub 2018 Aug 29.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验