Hofstetter Annika M, Robinson Jeffrey D, Lepere Katherine, Cunningham Morgan, Etsekson Nicole, Opel Douglas J
Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States; Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.
Department of Communication, Portland State University, Portland, OR, United States.
Vaccine. 2017 May 9;35(20):2709-2715. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.03.077. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
To examine how clinicians communicate with parents about influenza vaccination and the effect of these communication behaviors on parental vaccine decision-making.
We performed a secondary analysis of data obtained from a cross-sectional observational study in which health supervision visits between pediatric clinicians and English-speaking parents of young children were videotaped. Eligible visits occurred during the 2011-2012 and 2013-2014 influenza seasons, included children ≥6months, and contained an influenza vaccine discussion. A coding scheme of 10 communication behaviors was developed and applied to each visit. Associations between clinician communication behaviors and parental verbal vaccine acceptance and parental visit experience were examined using bivariate analysis and generalized linear mixed models.
Fifty visits involving 17 clinicians from 8 practices were included in analysis. The proportion of parents who accepted influenza vaccine was higher when clinicians initiated influenza vaccine recommendations using presumptive rather than participatory formats (94% vs. 28%, p<0.001; adjusted odds ratio 48.2, 95% CI 3.5-670.5). Parental acceptance was also higher if clinicians pursued (vs. did not pursue) original recommendations when parents voiced initial resistance (80% vs. 13%, p<0.05) or made recommendations for influenza vaccine concurrent with (vs. separate from) recommendations for other vaccines due at the visit (83% vs. 33%, p<0.01). Parental visit experience did not differ significantly by clinician communication behaviors.
Presumptive initiation of influenza vaccine recommendations, pursuit in the face of resistance, and concurrent vaccine recommendations appear to increase parental acceptance of influenza vaccine without negatively affecting visit experience.
探讨临床医生如何与家长就流感疫苗接种进行沟通,以及这些沟通行为对家长疫苗决策的影响。
我们对一项横断面观察性研究的数据进行了二次分析,该研究中对儿科临床医生与幼儿说英语的家长之间的健康监督访视进行了录像。符合条件的访视发生在2011 - 2012年和2013 - 2014年流感季节,包括6个月及以上的儿童,且包含流感疫苗讨论。制定了一个包含10种沟通行为的编码方案,并应用于每次访视。使用双变量分析和广义线性混合模型研究临床医生沟通行为与家长口头接受疫苗以及家长访视体验之间的关联。
分析纳入了来自8个医疗机构的17名临床医生的50次访视。当临床医生使用推定式而非参与式格式启动流感疫苗推荐时,接受流感疫苗的家长比例更高(94%对28%,p<0.001;调整后的优势比为48.2,95%置信区间为3.5 - 670.5)。当家长最初表示抗拒时,如果临床医生坚持(而非不坚持)最初的推荐,家长的接受度也更高(80%对13%,p<0.05);或者在本次访视中与其他应接种疫苗的推荐同时(而非分开)提出流感疫苗推荐时,家长的接受度更高(83%对33%,p<0.01)。家长的访视体验在临床医生沟通行为方面没有显著差异。
推定式启动流感疫苗推荐、面对抗拒时坚持以及同时提出疫苗推荐似乎能提高家长对流感疫苗的接受度,且不会对访视体验产生负面影响。