Department of Health Promotion & Behavioral Sciences, UTHealth School of Public Health in San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas.
Pediatrics. 2018 Jun;141(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-2312. Epub 2018 May 15.
: media-1vid110.1542/5754332185001PEDS-VA_2017-2312 OBJECTIVES: To prevent human papillomavirus (HPV)-related cancers, providers must effectively communicate with HPV vaccine-hesitant parents. Here, we developed a typology characterizing parent-provider communication around HPV vaccine hesitancy.
We audio-recorded 43 visits with unvaccinated adolescents at 6 pediatric clinics in Dallas, Texas in which parents were undecided about HPV vaccination. We qualitatively coded how parents verbally expressed hesitancy (assertive response, asking a question, or expressing concern) and whether providers responded with acquiescence (agree to defer vaccination) and/or persistence (continue discussion). We described the frequency of parent and provider communication codes and same-day vaccination.
Among the 43 visits, 37 parents expressed hesitancy ≥1 times in many ways. Assertive responses were most common (27 visits), followed by questions (16 visits), and concerns (12 visits). When the first expression of hesitancy was a question or concern, 71% and 75% of adolescents, respectively, received same-day vaccinations, whereas 33% of adolescents who received an initial assertive response were vaccinated. Providers responded with only persistence in 18 visits, a mix of acquiescence and persistence in 13 visits, and only acquiescence in 6 visits. When providers only used persistence, 17 of 18 adolescents were vaccinated; when providers responded with only acquiescence, no adolescents received the vaccine.
Our exploratory analysis reveals that providers engaging hesitant parents and addressing their concerns can lead to same-day HPV vaccination. Data reveal that even parents making assertive statements are amenable to influence by providers. Our findings reveal an important missed opportunity when providers simply acquiesce to parental hesitation.
为了预防人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)相关癌症,医护人员必须与对 HPV 疫苗犹豫不决的家长进行有效沟通。在此,我们开发了一种分类法,用于描述围绕 HPV 疫苗犹豫的家长与医护人员的沟通方式。
我们对德克萨斯州达拉斯市 6 家儿科诊所的 43 名未接种 HPV 疫苗的青少年进行了录音访问,这些家长对接种 HPV 疫苗犹豫不决。我们对家长以口头方式表达犹豫(坚定回应、提出问题或表示担忧)的方式进行了定性编码,并记录医护人员的回应方式是默认(同意推迟接种)还是坚持(继续讨论)。我们描述了家长和医护人员沟通方式的频率以及当天接种疫苗的情况。
在这 43 次访问中,37 位家长以多种方式至少表达了一次犹豫。坚定回应最为常见(27 次),其次是提问(16 次)和表示担忧(12 次)。当首次表达犹豫是一个问题或担忧时,分别有 71%和 75%的青少年当天接种了疫苗,而在接受初始坚定回应的青少年中,只有 33%接种了疫苗。在 18 次访问中,医护人员仅坚持讨论,在 13 次访问中,医护人员同时默认和坚持讨论,在 6 次访问中仅默认。当医护人员仅坚持讨论时,18 名青少年中有 17 名接种了疫苗;当医护人员仅默认时,没有青少年接种疫苗。
我们的探索性分析表明,医护人员与犹豫不决的家长接触并解决他们的担忧,可以促成当天接种 HPV 疫苗。数据表明,即使是表达坚定观点的家长也容易受到医护人员的影响。我们的研究结果表明,当医护人员只是默认家长的犹豫时,就错过了一个重要的机会。